ALBERT

Description: Surface wave methods provide a cost effective means of developing shear wave velocity ( Vs ) profiles for applications such as dynamic site characterization and seismic site response analyses. However, the inverse problem involved in obtaining a realistic layered earth model from surface wave dispersion data is inherently ill-posed, non-linear and mix-determined, without a unique solution. When available, a priori information such as geotechnical boreholes or geologic well logs should be used to aid in constraining site-specific inversion parameters. Unfortunately, a priori information is often unavailable, particularly at significant depths, and a ‘blind analysis’ must be performed. In these situations, the analyst must decide on an appropriate number of layers and ranges for their corresponding inversion parameters (i.e. trial number of layers and ranges in their respective thicknesses, shear wave velocities, compression wave velocities and mass densities). Selection of these parameters has been shown to significantly impact the results of an inversion. This paper presents a method for conducting multiple inversions utilizing systematically varied inversion layering parametrizations in order to identify and encompass the most reasonable layered earth models for a site. Each parametrization is defined by a unique layering ratio, which represents a multiplier that systemically increases the potential thickness of each layer in the inversion parametrization based on the potential thickness of the layer directly above it. The layering ratio method is demonstrated at two sites associated with the InterPacific Project, wherein it is shown to significantly aid in selecting reasonable Vs profiles that are close representations of the subsurface. While the goal of the layering ratio inversion methodology is not necessarily to find the ‘optimal’ or ‘best’ Vs profile for a site, it may be successful at doing so for certain sites/datasets. However, the primary reason for using the layering ratio method is to find Vs profiles that realistically represent the uncertainty in Vs resulting from surface wave inversion, and to avoid selection of Vs profiles that are unrealistic and adversely influenced by the choice of inversion parametrization.