ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Copenhagen : International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
    Acta crystallographica 57 (2001), S. 497-506 
    ISSN: 1600-5740
    Source: Crystallography Journals Online : IUCR Backfile Archive 1948-2001
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology , Geosciences , Physics
    Notes: The crystal structures of the title compounds were determined with net intensities I derived via the background–peak–background procedure. Least-squares optimizations reveal differences between the low-order (0 〈 s 〈 0.7 Å−1) and high-order (0.7 〈 s 〈 1.0 Å−1) structure models. The scale factors indicate discrepancies of up to 10% between the low-order and high-order reflection intensities. This observation is compound independent. It reflects the scan-angle-induced truncation error, because the applied scan angle (0.8 + 2.0 tan θ)° underestimates the wavelength dispersion in the monochromated X-ray beam. The observed crystal structures show pseudo-I-centred sublattices for three of its non-H atoms in the asymmetric unit. Our selection of observed intensities (I 〉 3σ) stresses that pseudo-symmetry. Model refinements on individual data sets with (h + k + l) = 2n and (h + k + l) = 2n + 1 illustrate the lack of model robustness caused by that pseudo-symmetry. To obtain a better balanced data set and thus a more robust structure we decided to exploit background modelling. We described the background intensities B(\displaystyle\mathrel{\mathop H^{\rightharpoonup}}) with an 11th degree polynomial in θ. This function predicts the local background b at each position \displaystyle\mathrel{\mathop H^{\rightharpoonup}} and defines the counting statistical distribution P(B), in which b serves as average and variance. The observation R defines P(R). This leads to P(I) = P(R)/P(B) and thus I = R − b and σ2(I) = I so that the error σ(I) is background independent. Within this framework we reanalysed the structure of the copper(II) derivative. Background modelling resulted in a structure model with an improved internal consistency. At the same time the unweighted R value based on all observations decreased from 10.6 to 8.4%. A redetermination of the structure at 120 K concluded the analysis.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...