ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Mathematical programming 11 (1976), S. 28-41 
    ISSN: 1436-4646
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Computer Science , Mathematics
    Notes: Abstract This paper considers an election between candidatesA andB in which (1) voters may be uncertain about which candidate they will vote for, and (2) the winner is to be determined by a lottery betweenA andB that is based on their vote totals. This lottery is required to treat voters equally, to treat candidates equally, and to respond nonnegatively to increased support for a candidate. The setΛ n of all such lottery rules based on a total ofn voters is the convex hull of aboutn/2 ‘basic’ lottery rules which include the simple majority rule. For odd values ofn ≥ 3 let $$\mu (n) = \tfrac{1}{2} + (n - 1)/[2n(n + 3)]$$ , and for even values ofn ≥ 4 let $$\mu (n) = \tfrac{1}{2} + [(n + 2)(2n(n + 2))^{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}} - n(n + 6)]/[n(n - 2)(n + 4)]$$ . With $$\bar p$$ the average of then voters probabilities of voting forA, it is shown that withinΛ n the simple majority rule maximizes candidateA's overall win probability whenever $$\bar p \geqslant \mu (n)$$ , and thatμ(n) is the smallest number for which this is true. Similarly, the simple majority rule maximizesB's overall win probability whenever $$1 - \bar p$$ (the average of the voters probabilities of voting forB) is as large asμ(n).
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...