ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 0021-9541
    Keywords: Life and Medical Sciences ; Cell & Developmental Biology
    Source: Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000
    Topics: Biology , Medicine
    Notes: Quite a number of phenomena having to do with cells' influences upon one another's movements have come to be regarded as expressions of “contact inhibition.” However, no single, central mechanism has been shown to underlie them all. Consequently, the term “contact inhibition” should not be used without operational modifiers. Inhibitions of individual cell movements imputed to be mediated by cell-cell contacts include inhibition of overlapping (which results in monolayering), of colony expansion, of cell speed (nuclear translocation), of ruffling, of orthogonal movement (proposed to explain spontaneous parallel alignment of cells), and of neighbor exchanges.The six inhibitions listed above are operationally distinct, and only two (overlapping and colony expansion) are known to result from a common mechanism. A seventh phenomenon, so-called “contact inhibition of cell division” (more operationally termed postconfluence inhibition of cell division) is in a separate category and is not considered here.Evidence eliminating action-at-a-distance is available only for the first three, and hence only these should at present be termed contact inhibitions. Inhibition of neighbor exchanges is yet hypothetical; at its extreme, it would immobilize cells in a confluent monolayer, but such immobilization has been found not to occur.Contact inhibition of overlapping, the most studied of the six, is not displayed by invasive cells with respect to normal cells; invasive tumor cells overlap freely upon normal cells, although not necessarily upon one another. Contact inhibition of overlapping, and its loss by invasive cells, can readily be interpreted, by means of the differential adhesion hypothesis, as consequences of cell-type-specific differences in cell-cell and cell-substratum “strengths of adhesion.” These strengths of adhesion are formulated as specific interfacial free energies, which are the only parameters of cellular adhesiveness that have been rigorously shown to determine equilibrium configurations of cell populations.
    Additional Material: 1 Ill.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...