ISSN:
1573-0476
Keywords:
relative risk
;
value of life
;
contingent valuation
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Economics
Notes:
Abstract Subjects were less willing to pay for government medical insurance for diseases when the number of people who could not be cured was higher, holding constant the number who could be cured. In a second experiment, willingness to pay (from a hypothetical government windfall) for risk reduction was unaffected by whether the risk was described in terms of percentage or number of lives saved, even though subjects knew that the risks in question differed in prevalence. These results are consistent with the findings of Fetherstonhaugh et al., Jenni and Loewenstein, and others. I suggest that these results can be explained in terms of a general tendency to confuse proportions and differences, a confusion that is analogous to other confusions of quantitative dimensions in children, adults, the news media, and perhaps even the epidemiological literature.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007796310463
Permalink