ISSN:
0263-080X
Source:
Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005
Topics:
Architecture, Civil Engineering, Surveying
Notes:
Government funding is directed towards the refurbishment ofrun-down high-rise blocks and estates of local authority housing throughEstate Action. While glossy annual reports advertise excellent results,what independent evidence is there to support the policies recommendedby PEP and Estate Action? The number of follow-up surveys is extremelylimited. When the sums of money spent annually through Estate Action areconsidered, this unaccountability is surely not acceptable.Additionally, on a local scale, individual local authorities should takethe time to discover whether or not their schemes have been assuccessful with the tenants as they were intended to be and to ensurethat any feedback is incorporated into future projects. Tenant surveysof two refurbished high-rise tower blocks have been undertaken. Theintention was to determine the levels of tenant satisfaction andrelative success of the two schemes. Were these schemes an effective andefficient use of funds? Have they solved at least some of the wide rangeof problems which tower blocks such as these typically experience?Additionally, estate managers were interviewed to determine their viewson the relative success of each scheme. Have these schemes indeedmanaged to "improve the quality of life of run down housingestates through refurbishment, tenant/ management initiatives andpartnerships with the private sector..." (Sir George Young, 1985speech as Minister for Housing and Planning, launching the Urban Housingand Renewal Unit (UHRU) later to become Estate Action).
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02630809510089838
Permalink