Publication Date:
2022-10-26
Description:
Author Posting. © National Academy of Sciences, 2019. This article is posted here by permission of National Academy of Sciences for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (24), (2019):11646-11651, doi:10.1073/pnas.1900371116.
Description:
Measurements show large decadal variability in the rate of CO2 accumulation in the atmosphere that is not driven by CO2 emissions. The decade of the 1990s experienced enhanced carbon accumulation in the atmosphere relative to emissions, while in the 2000s, the atmospheric growth rate slowed, even though emissions grew rapidly. These variations are driven by natural sources and sinks of CO2 due to the ocean and the terrestrial biosphere. In this study, we compare three independent methods for estimating oceanic CO2 uptake and find that the ocean carbon sink could be responsible for up to 40% of the observed decadal variability in atmospheric CO2 accumulation. Data-based estimates of the ocean carbon sink from pCO2 mapping methods and decadal ocean inverse models generally agree on the magnitude and sign of decadal variability in the ocean CO2 sink at both global and regional scales. Simulations with ocean biogeochemical models confirm that climate variability drove the observed decadal trends in ocean CO2 uptake, but also demonstrate that the sensitivity of ocean CO2 uptake to climate variability may be too weak in models. Furthermore, all estimates point toward coherent decadal variability in the oceanic and terrestrial CO2 sinks, and this variability is not well-matched by current global vegetation models. Reconciling these differences will help to constrain the sensitivity of oceanic and terrestrial CO2 uptake to climate variability and lead to improved climate projections and decadal climate predictions.
Description:
We thank Rebecca Wright and Erik Buitenhuis at University of East Anglia, Norwich, for providing updated runs from the NEMO-PlankTOM5 model. T.D. was supported by NSF Grant OCE-1658392. C.L.Q. thanks the UK Natural Environment Research Council for supporting the SONATA Project (Grant NE/P021417/1). P.L. was supported by the Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science. J.H. was supported under Helmholtz Young Investigator Group Marine Carbon and Ecosystem Feedbacks in the Earth System (MarESys) Grant VH-NG-1301. S.B. and R.S. were supported by the H2020 project CRESCENDO “Coordinated Research in Earth Systems and Climate: Experiments, Knowledge, Dissemination and Outreach,” which received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Grant No 641816. SOCAT is an international effort, endorsed by the International Ocean Carbon Coordination Project, the Surface Ocean-Lower Atmosphere Study, and the Integrated Marine Biosphere Research program, to deliver a uniformly quality-controlled surface ocean CO2 database. The many researchers and funding agencies responsible for the collection of data and quality control are thanked for their contributions to SOCAT.
Description:
2019-11-28
Keywords:
Carbon dioxide
;
Ocean carbon sink
;
Terrestrial carbon sink
;
Climate variability
;
Carbon budget
Repository Name:
Woods Hole Open Access Server
Type:
Article
Permalink
