Publication Date:
2019
Description:
Abstract
Regardless of the numerous significant contributions in the field (e.g., Svensmark, H. & Svensmark, J., 2009, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038429; Svensmark, J., et al, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-12-3595-2012), the impact of cosmic rays on Earth's weather is still a source of misunderstanding among scientists. Chree method of analysis (Chree, 1912, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1913.0003) is one of the commonest tool used in the investigation. But the method has been queried by some publications. Greater number of these critiques (Forbush et al., 1983, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145551; Prager & hoenig, 1989, https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1989)118〈0608:SEAART〉2.3.CO;2) (Forbush et al., 1983; Prager & Hoenig, 1989) point to the test of significance of epoch superposition results. Forbush events are the most widely key event time used in solar Earth's weather investigation. Despite the early indications of Marcz (1997, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(96)00076-4) that the result of compositing analysis depends on the Forbush event selection criteria and timing, various conflicting methods of event selection still dominate articles documenting Forbush decrease (FD)‐related correlations. The present submission calls the attention of researchers to the need for a systematic FD event identification with respect to timing and magnitude estimation prior to compositing/correlation/regression analyses. The relationship between program‐selected FDs, World Wide Lightning Location Network (WWLLN) data, and solar/geophysical parameters is tested at different regions of the world. Significant correlations between WWLLN and other parameters were observed at the U.S. latitude band and within the African region.
Print ISSN:
2169-9380
Electronic ISSN:
2169-9402
Topics:
Geosciences
,
Physics
Permalink