Publication Date:
2016-07-13
Description:
Here we assess estimates of atmospheric evaporative demand over China in twelve state-of-the-art Global Climate Models (GCMs) against observed D20 pan evaporation ( E pan ) over the period 1961–2000. To do that, we use an energy-relevant and physical-based approach, namely PenPan model, to comprehensively evaluate GCM performance with respect to their ability to simulate annual, seasonal and monthly statistics of E pan (and its radiative and aerodynamic components, E p , R and E p , A ). The results indicated that most GCMs generally captured the spatial pattern and seasonal cycle of E pan , E p , R and E p , A . However, regional means of annual and monthly E pan , E p , R and E p , A were underestimated by most GCMs mainly due to negatively biased surface air temperature ( T a ) and vapour pressure deficit ( vpd ) outputted/simulated by the GCMs. Overall, the discrepancies among GCMs in estimating the regional statistics (regional means and seasonal cycles) of E p , A were relatively larger than that ofE p , R , which indicates considerable uncertainties in the calculation of the aerodynamic component of evaporation based on the GCM outputs. Moreover, a few GCMs captured negative trends of regional mean annual and seasonal E pan , E p , R and E p , A well over the period 1961– 2000, but most showed positive trends. The underestimation of net radiation ( R n ) and overestimation of wind speed at 2 meters ( u 2 ) in most GCMs may, to some extent, accentuate/compensate the negative biases in GCM-estimated annual and seasonal E pan , E p , R and E p , A . The results demonstrate the importance of incorporating observation of pan evaporation and well validated PenPan model to evaluate GCMs performance on atmospheric evaporative demand that is relevant to projections of future drought and regional water-energy budgets.
Print ISSN:
0148-0227
Topics:
Geosciences
,
Physics
Permalink