Publikationsdatum:
2011-12-05
Beschreibung:
For many millennia humans and reptiles have interacted, but the attitude of humans towards these animals has depended on culture, environment, and personal experience. At least 719 reptile species are known to occur in Brazil and about 11% of this fauna has been exploited for many different purposes, including bushmeat, leather, ornamental and magic/religious uses, and as folk medicines. Brazil can therefore serve as an interesting case study for better understanding reptile use by human societies, and the present paper catalogues some of the reptile species being used in Brazil and discusses implications for their conservation. A literature review indicated that 81 reptile species are culturally important in this country, with 47 (58%) species having multiple uses, 54 being used for medicinal purposes, 38 as food, 28 for ornamental or decorative purposes, 20 used in magic/religious practices, 18 as pets, and 40 are commonly killed when they come into contact with humans. Regarding their conservation status, 30 (37.5%) are included on State's Red List, Brazilian Red List or the IUCN Red List. There are many forms of interaction between reptiles and humans in Brazil—although most of them are quite negative in terms of wildlife conservation—which reinforces the importance of understanding such uses and interactions in the context of protecting reptiles in Brazil. A better understanding of the cultural, social, and traditional roles of these reptiles is fundamental to establishing management plans for their sustainable use. Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-25 DOI 10.1007/s10661-011-2465-0 Authors Rômulo Romeu Nóbrega Alves, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Av. das Baraúnas, 351/Campus Universitário Bodocongó, 58109-753 Campina Grande, PB, Brazil Kleber Silva Vieira, Departamento de Sistemática e Ecologia da Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas (Zoologia), Laboratório de Ecofisiologia Animal, 58051-900 João Pessoa, PB, Brazil Gindomar Gomes Santana, Departamento de Botânica, Ecologia e Zoologia, Bolsista de Desenvolvimento Científico Regional (DCR/CNPq/FAPERN), Ecologia e Zoologia, Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade (LECOB), Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Lagoa Nova, 59072-970 Natal, RN, Brazil Washington Luiz Silva Vieira, Departamento de Sistemática e Ecologia da Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas (Zoologia), Laboratório de Ecofisiologia Animal, 58051-900 João Pessoa, PB, Brazil Waltécio Oliveira Almeida, Departamento de Química Biológica Bolsista Produtividade da Fundação Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico—FUNCAP, Universidade Regional do Cariri, Rua Cel. Antônio Luiz 1161, CEP, 63100-000 Crato, CE, Brazil Wedson Medeiros Silva Souto, Departamento de Sistemática e Ecologia da Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas (Zoologia), Laboratório de Ecofisiologia Animal, 58051-900 João Pessoa, PB, Brazil Paulo Fernando Guedes Pereira Montenegro, Departamento de Sistemática e Ecologia da Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Laboratório de Ecofisiologia Animal, 58051-900 João Pessoa, PB, Brazil Juarez Carlos Brito Pezzuti, Núcleo de Altos Estudos Amazônicos—NAEA, Universidade Federal do Pará—UFPA, Belem, Brazil Journal Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Online ISSN 1573-2959 Print ISSN 0167-6369
Print ISSN:
0167-6369
Digitale ISSN:
1573-2959
Thema:
Energietechnik
Permalink