Publication Date:
2018
Description:
〈p〉Publication date: November 2018〈/p〉
〈p〉〈b〉Source:〈/b〉 Journal of Hydrology, Volume 566〈/p〉
〈p〉Author(s): Claudia Feijoó, María Laura Messetta, Cecilia Hegoburu, Alicia Gómez Vázquez, José Guerra-López, Josep Mas-Pla, Laura Rigacci, Victoria García, Andrea Butturini〈/p〉
〈div xml:lang="en"〉
〈h5〉Abstract〈/h5〉
〈div〉
〈p〉The relevance of fluvial systems to process nutrients and carbon is widely accepted, but their role as sinks and sources of nutrients and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) is still under discussion especially in non-forested and highly productive streams. In this study, we used a mass balance approach at a reach scale in a Pampean stream to elucidate the major sources of water, nutrients and DOC as well as to determine net in-stream retention efficiencies of nutrients and DOC under different hydrological conditions.〈/p〉
〈p〉We measured conductivity, conservative ions (chloride and calcium), soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), nitrate (NO〈sub〉3〈/sub〉), nitrite (NO〈sub〉2〈/sub〉), ammonium (NH〈sub〉4〈/sub〉) and DOC at the end-point of a reach of Las Flores stream (site A), at two upstream tributaries (B1 and B2), and at each potential hydrological contributors to stream flow (groundwater, overland and subsurface flows, and rainfall). In addition, we monitored one storm event where we collected samples during the rising and the recession limb of the hydrograph.〈/p〉
〈p〉Stream flow originated from groundwater (≈50%), upstream tributaries (B1 and B2) at baseflow, whereas overland flow contributed 〉20% during high flows. During baseflow, groundwater provided NO〈sub〉3〈/sub〉 to stream water, while B2, which received a point input of a dairy industry, was the main source of SRP and NH〈sub〉4〈/sub〉. Conversely, SRP and NH〈sub〉4〈/sub〉 were provided by B1, overland flow and subsurface flow during high flows. Overland flow also contributed DOC during high flow periods. Mass balance estimates revealed that the reach acts as a source of DOC, SRP and NO〈sub〉3〈/sub〉 (21.4, 37.4 and 53.5% mean net in-stream release, respectively) and a sink of NH〈sub〉4〈/sub〉 (−36.8% mean net in-stream retention). Relevant in-stream processes may be nutrient uptake (as in the case of SRP and NH〈sub〉4〈/sub〉) and biotic production (DOC), as well as decomposition (SRP) and nitrification (NH〈sub〉4〈/sub〉) in this Pampean stream. Our results stress the relevance of nutrient and DOC generation processes within the channel in non-forested and highly productive streams.〈/p〉
〈/div〉
〈/div〉
〈div xml:lang="en"〉
〈h5〉Graphical abstract〈/h5〉
〈div〉〈p〉〈figure〉〈img src="https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0022169418307455-ga1.jpg" width="500" alt="Graphical abstract for this article" title=""〉〈/figure〉〈/p〉〈/div〉
〈/div〉
Print ISSN:
0022-1694
Electronic ISSN:
1879-2707
Topics:
Architecture, Civil Engineering, Surveying
,
Geography
,
Geosciences
Permalink