Publication Date:
2013-09-27
Description:
It is generally assumed that Conservativity is a necessary ingredient for interpreting collective and cumulative predicates or, more in general, for interpreting—what I termed as—Independent Set (IS) readings (a.k.a. Scopeless readings). Under this assumption, several approaches aiming at formally providing logical representations of collective/cumulative readings implement Conservativity. This is done also in the frameworks defined in Winter (2001, Flexibility Principles in Boolean Semantics: Coordination, Plurality, and Scope in Natural Language , MIT Press) and in Robaldo (2011, J. Logic Lang. Infor. , 20, 233–271). This article investigates further the role played by Conservativity in the interpretation of IS readings, and argues that its need is not specifically due to the use of collective/cumulative predicates. Rather, it serves to maximize witness sets for quantifiers thereby guaranteeing correct truth conditions in several cases.
Print ISSN:
1367-0751
Electronic ISSN:
1368-9894
Topics:
Mathematics
Permalink