ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

Language
Number of Hits per Page
Default Sort Criterion
Default Sort Ordering
Size of Search History
Default Email Address
Default Export Format
Default Export Encoding
Facet list arrangement
Maximum number of values per filter
Auto Completion
Topics (search only within journals and journal articles that belong to one or more of the selected topics)
Feed Format
Maximum Number of Items per Feed
feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Books
  • Articles  (1)
  • Latest Papers from Table of Contents or Articles in Press  (1)
  • design engineering  (1)
  • 2020-2024
  • 2010-2014  (1)
  • 1970-1974
  • 1950-1954
  • 1935-1939
  • Architecture, Civil Engineering, Surveying  (1)
Collection
  • Books
  • Articles  (1)
Source
  • Latest Papers from Table of Contents or Articles in Press  (1)
Years
  • 2020-2024
  • 2010-2014  (1)
  • 1970-1974
  • 1950-1954
  • 1935-1939
Year
Topic
  • Architecture, Civil Engineering, Surveying  (1)
  • Geosciences  (1)
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2011-03-31
    Description: Earthquake-resistant design guidelines commonly prescribe that when conducting seismic response analyses: (i) a minimum of three ground motions can be used; (ii) if less than seven ground motions are considered, the maximum of the responses should be used in design; and (iii) if seven or more ground motions are considered the average of the responses should be used in design. Such guidelines attempt to predict the mean seismic response from a limited number of analyses, but are based on judgment without a sound, yet pragmatic, theoretical basis. This paper presents a rational approach for determining design seismic demands based on the results of seismic response analyses. The proposed method uses the 84th percentile of the distribution of the sample mean seismic demand as the design seismic demand. This approach takes into account: (i) the number of ground motions considered; (ii) how the ground motions are selected and scaled; and (iii) the differing variability in estimating different types of seismic response parameters. A simple analytic function gives a ratio which, when multiplied by the mean response obtained from the seismic response analyses, gives the value to be used in design, thus making the proposed approach suitable for routine design implementation.
    Keywords: design engineering ; earthquake engineering ; probability ; structural engineering
    Print ISSN: 8755-2930
    Topics: Architecture, Civil Engineering, Surveying , Geosciences
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...