ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Articles  (1)
  • Data
  • Articles: DFG German National Licenses  (1)
  • earthquakes
  • velocity
  • 1980-1984  (1)
  • 1983  (1)
  • 1980
Collection
  • Articles  (1)
  • Data
Source
Publisher
Years
  • 1980-1984  (1)
Year
Topic
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Hydrobiologia 106 (1983), S. 157-168 
    ISSN: 1573-5117
    Keywords: benthic macroinvertebrates ; instream flow management ; depth ; velocity ; substrate ; microhabitat preferences
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology
    Notes: Abstract Estimates of numbers, biomass, and diversity of benthic macroinvertebrates were made quarterly over a two-year period to investigate microhabitat preferences. Although biomass of most taxa was significantly different among sampling times, physical factors also appeared to be important in determining abundance of many taxa. Optimum depth, velocity, substrate type, and turbulence were determined for major taxa. Optimum conditions for diversity appeared to be 34 cm depth, 60 cm s−1 velocity, and rubble and boulder substrate type. Habitat preference functions were derived for several taxa based on significant polynomial regressions of biomass on depth, velocity, substrate, and Froude number (turbulence). The relationship between abundance and physical habitat conditions was tested by using the product of the preference factors (range: 0–1) for depth, velocity and substrate type as a measure of habitat suitability (joint preference factor). There were significant correlations between biomass [transformed by loge (x + 1)] of 10 benthic species and the joint preference factor. The joint preference factors accounted for from 11 to 61% of the variation of biomass of the 10 benthic species. The intercepts of the relationships between biomass of individual species and the joint preference factor were not significantly different from zero for any species. Therefore, the joint preference factors appear to be valid indicators of biomass. The preference functions have utility in habitat assessment studies, specifically with regard to minimum instream flow determinations.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...