Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Point mutation in FGF receptor eliminates phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis without affecting mitogenesis

Abstract

STIMULATION of growth factor receptors with tyrosine kinase activity is followed by rapid receptor dimerization, tyrosine autophosphorylation and phosphorylation of signalling molecules such as phospholipase Cγ(PLCγ) and the ros GTPase-activating protein1,2. PLCγ and GTPase-activating protein bind to specific tyrosine-phosphorylated regions in growth factor receptors3–9through their sir-homologous SH2 domains7,8,10,11. Growth factor-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of PLCγ is essential for stimulation of phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis in vitro12 and in vivo13. We have shown that a short phosphorylated peptide containing tyrosine at position 766 from a conserved region14–18 of the fibre-blast growth factor (FGF) receptor is a binding site for the SH2 domain of PLCγ (ref. 8). Here we show that an FGF receptor point mutant in which Tyr766 is replaced by a phenylalanine residue (Y766F) is unable to associate with and tyrosine-phosphorylate PLCγ or to stimulate hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol. Nevertheless, the Y766F FGF receptor mutant can be autophos-phorylated, and can phosphorylate several cellular proteins and stimulate DNA synthesis. Our data show that phosphorylation of the conserved Tyr 766 of the FGF receptor is essential for phosphorylation of PLCγ and for hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol, but that elimination of this hydrolysis does not affect FGF-induced mitogenesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ullrich, A. & Schlessinger, J. Cell 61, 203–212 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cantley, L. C. et al. Cell 64, 281–302 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wahl, M. I., Nishibe, S., Suh, P.-G., Rhee, S. G. & Carpenter, G. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 1568–1572 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Meisenhelder, J., Suh, P.-G., Rhee, S. G. & Hunter, T. Cell 57, 1109–1122 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Margolis, B. et al. Cell 57, 1101–1107 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Burgess, W. H. et al. Molec. cell. Biol. 10, 4770–4777 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Margolis, B. et al. EMBO J. 9, 4375–4380 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohammadi, M. et al. Molec. cell. Biol. 11, 5068–5078 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaplan, D. R., Morrison, D. K., Wong, G., McCormick, F. & Williams, L. T. Cell 61, 125–133 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Koch, C. A., Anderson D., Moran, M., Ellis, C. & Pawson, T. Science 252, 668–674 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Anderson, D. et al. Science 250, 979–982 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nishibe, S. et al. Science 250, 1253–1255 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim, H. K. et al. Cell 65, 435–441 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, P. L., Johnson, D. E., Cousens, L. S., Fried, V. A. & Williams, L. T. Science 245, 5760 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ruta, M. et al. Oncogene 3, 9–15 (1988).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kornbluth, S., Paulson, K. E. & Hanafusa, H. Molec. cell. Biol. 8, 5541–5544 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Keegan, K., Johnson, D. E., Williams, L. T. & Hayman, M. J. Proc. natn. Acad Sci. U.S.A. 88, 1095–1099 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dionne, C. A. et al. EMBO J. 9, 2685–2692 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumjian, D. A., Wahl, M. I., Rhee, S. G. & Hunter, T. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 8232–8239 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Morrison, D. K., Kaplan, D. R., Rhee, S. G. & Hunter, T. Molec. cell. Biol. 10, 2359–2366 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kumjian, D. A., Barnstein, A., Rhee, S. G. & Daniel, T. O. J. biol. Chem. 266, 3973–3980 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Margolis, B. et al. Science 248, 607–610 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cuadrado, A. & Molloy, C. J. Molec. cell. Biol. 10, 6069–6072 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sultzman, L., Ellis, C., Lin, L-L., Pawson, T. & Knopf, J. Molec. cell. Biol. 11, 2018–2025 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith, M. R., Liu, Y.-L., Kim, H., Rhee, S. G. & Kung, H.-F. Science 247, 1074–1077 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith, M. R., Ryu, S.-H., Suh, P. G., Rhee, S. G. & Kung, H. F. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 3659–3663 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Molloy, C. J. et al. Nature 342, 711–714 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Downing, J. R. et al. EMBO J. 8, 3345–3350 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Paterno, G. D., Gillepsie, L. L., Dixon, M. S., Slack, J. M. W. & Heath, J. K. Development 106, 79–83 (1989).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Amaya, E., Musci, T. J. & Kirschner, M. W. Cell 66, 257–270 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Berridge, M. J., Downes, C. P. & Hanley, M. J. Cell 59, 411–419 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Goldschmidt-Clermont, P. J., Kim, J. W., Machesky, L. M., Rhee, S. G. & Pollard, T. D. Science 251, 1231–1233 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jaye, M., Lyall, R. M., Mudd, R., Schlessinger, J. & Sarver, N. EMBO J. 7, 963–969 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen, C. & Okayamad H. Molec. cell. Biol. 7, 2745–2752 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohammadi, M., Dionne, C., Li, W. et al. Point mutation in FGF receptor eliminates phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis without affecting mitogenesis. Nature 358, 681–684 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/358681a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/358681a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing