Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Sex Ratios under Natural Selection

Abstract

SEVERAL workers1,2 have shown the numerical equality of two sexes (that is, a 1 : 1 sex ratio) to be selectively favoured in relation to the parental effort involved in the rearing of offsprings to maturity. More recently, Kalmus and Smith3 have argued in support of the adaptive superiority of this ratio on the basis of such considerations as those of hybridity, recombination potential and the level of inbreeding as influenced by sex ratio variations. However, their arguments are not valid in general and at best seem to apply only to the monogamous species. In fact, widely deviant sex ratios are reported to occur in the natural populations of both polygamodiœcious and gynodiœcious species4,5, and Lewis5 has suggested that sex ratio adjustments frequently through a preponderance of females help ensure reproductive economy combined with the maintenance of certain hybridity optima in such species. In a few theoretical examples analysed by Shaw6, such adaptive changes were examined in the presence of certain specific sex-ratio factors. In this note a model of differential selection for an autosomal recessive in the two sexes is utilized to show that maximum levels of heterozygosity (say 0.50 where gene frequencies p, q = ½) could be attained with variable sex ratios, a result in disagreement with the view of Kalmus and Smith3.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fisher, R. A., The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, 272 (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1930).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bodmer, W. F., and Edwards, A. F. W., Ann. Human Genet., 24, 239 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kalmus, H., and Smith, C. A. B., Nature, 186, 1004 (1960).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pauley, S. S., and Mennel, G. F., Minnesota Forestry Notes, 55, 1 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lewis, D., Biol. Revs., 17, 46 (1942).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shaw, R. F., Genetics, 43, 149 (1958).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Watson, G. S., Evolution, 14, 256 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mather, K., Nature, 145, 484 (1940).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Grant, V., Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 23, 337 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

JAIN, S. Sex Ratios under Natural Selection. Nature 200, 1340–1341 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1038/2001340c0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2001340c0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing