Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Histocompatibility Antigens in Transplanted Mouse Eggs

Abstract

THE hypotheses advanced to account for the success of the foetus as an intra-uterine homograft in pregnancy have recently been reviewed by Billingham1. Three possible mechanisms have been suggested to explain the apparent lack of immunological reaction by the pregnant mother against the genetically foreign offspring with which she is in intimate contact2: (a) the antigenic immaturity of the foetus; (b) the immunological inertness of the mother; and (c) some form of anatomical separation of the foetus from the mother. It has, however, been shown that transplantation antigens appear early in embryonic life and that the mother, though pregnant, is fully capable of reacting against these antigens3–5. In addition, it has been shown that the uterus is not a specially privileged recipient site for prolonged homograft survival6,7.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Billingham, R. E., New Eng. J. Med., 270, 667 and 720 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Medawar, P. B., Evolution, 7, 320 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Woodruff, M. F. A., Proc. Roy. Soc., B, 148, 68 (1957).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Terasaki, P. I., J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol., 7, 409 (1959).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Haskova, V., in Biological Problems of Grafting, 95, edit. by Albert, F., and Medawar, P. B. (Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schlesinger, M., J. Nat. Cancer Inst., 28, 927 (1962).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Poppa, G., Simmons, R. L., David, D. S., and Russell, P. S., Transplantation, 2, 496 (1964).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Simmons, R. L., and Russell, P. S., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 99, 717 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Simmons, R. L., and Russell, P. S., Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec., 85, 583 (1963).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Billingham, R. E., and Medawar, P. B., Brit. J. Exp. Biol., 28, 385 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stimpfling, J. H., Transpl. Bull., 27, 109 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Simmons, R. L., and Russell, P. S., Transplantation, 2, 551 (1964).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kirby, D. R. S., J. Embryol. Exp. Morph., 10, 496 (1962).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kirby, D. R. S., Nature, 194, 785 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SIMMONS, R., RUSSELL, P. Histocompatibility Antigens in Transplanted Mouse Eggs. Nature 208, 698–699 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1038/208698a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/208698a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing