Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Absence of Pulsar Characteristics in Several X-ray Sources

Abstract

VERY condensed stars have been suggested as sources of celestial X-rays1,2 and pulsar radio emission3. The fact that the pulsar CP 0950 (ref. 4) falls within the uncertainty in the position of the X-ray source Leo XR-1 (ref. 5) could be significant and the discovery of a pulsar in the centre of the Crab nebula, a strong X-ray source, is particularly interesting although the X-rays have been shown6 to arise from a somewhat extended region. The distribution of pulsars and X-ray sources in galactic latitude, however, is very dissimilar. This lack of correlation could occur if the dense stars, which we assume hypothetically to be responsible for both types of object, were very common, and were confined to the galactic plane. If the pulsar phenomenon were much more prevalent than the X-ray phenomenon then, on the average, more-distant stars would be seen as X-ray objects and their distribution would appear to be much more closely confined to the galactic plane. This argument would also depend on the distance to which we are capable of detecting each type of object. The distances that have commonly been deduced for pulsars are sufficiently small that if a bremsstrahlung source similar to currently observed X-ray stars were present, it should be seen as an optical object, which is not the case.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morton, D. C., Ann. d'Astrophys., 27, 813 (1964).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shklovsky, I. S., Astrophys. J., 148, L1 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Durney, B. R., Faulkner, J., Gribbin, J. R., and Roxburgh, I. W., Nature, 219, 20 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Turtle, A. J., and Vaughan, A. E., Nature, 219, 845 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Friedman, H., Byram, E. T., and Chubb, T. A., Science, 156, 374 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bowyer, S., Byram, E. T., Chubb, T. A., and Friedman, H., Science, 146, 912 (1964).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Habing, H. J., and Pottasch, S. R., Nature, 219, 1137 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. de Jager, G., Lyne, A. G., Pointon, L., and Ponsonby, J. E. B., Nature, 220, 128 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Spitzer, jun., L., and Tomasko, M. G., Astrophys. J., 152, 971 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Spitzer, jun., L., Astrophys. J., 124, 20 (1956).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Henry, R. C., Fritz, G., Meekins, J. F., Friedman, H., and Byram, E. T., Astrophys. J., 153, L11 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shuter, W. L. H., Venugopal, V. R., and Mahoney, M. J., Nature, 220, 356 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jenkins, E. B., and Morton, D. C., Nature, 215, 1257 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bowyer, C. S., Field, G. B., and Mack, J. E., Nature, 217, 32 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Large, M. I., Vaughan, A. E., and Mills, B. Y., Nature, 220, 340 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lawrence, G. M., Ostriker, J. P., and Hesser, J. E., Astrophys. J., 148, L161 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Westphal, J. A., Sandage, A., and Kristian, J., Astrophys. J., 154, 139 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Israel, W., Nature, 218, 1235 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fritz, G., Meekins, J. F., Henry, R. C., Byram, E. T., and Friedman, H., Astrophys. J., 153, L199 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bendat, J. S., and Piersol, A. G., Measurement and Analysis of Random Data, 278 (Wiley, New York, 1966).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Drake, F. D., and Craft, jun., H. D., Nature, 220, 231 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Andrew, B. H., and Purton, C. R., Nature, 218, 855 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

FRIEDMAN, H., FRITZ, G., HENRY, R. et al. Absence of Pulsar Characteristics in Several X-ray Sources. Nature 221, 345–347 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1038/221345a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/221345a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing