Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Models and statistics for species diversity

Abstract

INTEREST in the pattern of species abundances in a population takes two forms. On the one hand a study of the full distribution of the relative abundances of species may be sought to give insight into the internal mechanisms of the community; in other cases one or more summary statistics which suitably characterise the population may be required to investigate effects of evolutionary or environmental change. The first approach has led to much argument over the appropriate mathematical form for the distribution of abundances, often in the belief that the acceptance of a particular mathematical model will tell us something about the causal biological mechanism. In our opinion, however, the primary purpose of fitting a mathematical model is to smooth the data and enable efficient estimation of population statistics from the parameters of the model; for this we would choose the simplest model which adequately describes the data. Further, there are clear advantages in fitting a single model to describe a series of sets of data—even if this model does not give the best fit to each one—rather than fitting several different models, as has often been suggested, particularly in the literature on succession.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Taylor, L. R., Kempton, R. A., and Woiwod, I. P., J. anim. Ecol, 45, 255–271 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Whittaker, R. H., Taxon, 21, 213–251 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher, R. A., Corbet, A. S., and Williams, C. B., J. anim. Ecol., 12, 42–58 (1943).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Patrick, R., Am. Nat., 102, 173–183 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kempton, R. A., and Taylor, L. R., J. anim. Ecol, 43, 381–399 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bazzaz, F. A., Ecology, 56, 485–488 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. May, R. M., Nature, 258, 285–286 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

KEMPTON, R., TAYLOR, L. Models and statistics for species diversity. Nature 262, 818–820 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/262818a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/262818a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing