Abstract
SVENDSEN1 showed that the estimate of an earthworm population obtained by hand sorting soil samples was much greater than that by the prevalent method of bringing worms to the soil surface with potassium permanganate solution, and so emphasized that, although laborious, hand sorting was more accurate for population studies. The accuracy of estimates by hand sorting has not been studied but is likely to depend on soil type and conditions, as well as on the time and care taken to examine the sample. One way to estimate accuracy is to see how many worms can be recovered when samples, already hand sorted, are examined again by a different method.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Svendsen, J. A., Nature, 175, 864 (1955).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
RAW, F. Earthworm Population Studies : a Comparison of Sampling Methods. Nature 187, 257 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1038/187257a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/187257a0
This article is cited by
-
Comparison of the mustard oil and electrical methods for sampling earthworm communities in rural and urban soils
Urban Ecosystems (2021)
-
Applications of physical methods in estimation of soil biota and soil organic matter
Soil Ecology Letters (2020)
-
Extraction of earthworm from soil by different sampling methods: a review
Environment, Development and Sustainability (2016)
-
Density, biomass and vertical distribution ofAporrectodea caliginosa (Savigny 1826) (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae) in Benghazi, Libya
Biology and Fertility of Soils (1997)
-
Population dynamics of the earthworm Amynthas alexandri (Annelida: Megascolecidae) in a Kumaun Himalayan pasture soil
Biology and Fertility of Soils (1994)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.