Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Neural Transplants and Insect Diapause

Abstract

THE induction and maintenance of larval and pupal diapause are at present thought to be under the direct control of the neuro-endocrine complex associated with the insect brain. Williams1 found that diapausing pupæ of the cecropia moth, Hyalophora cecropia, could be induced to resume development by either a prolonged (6–12 weeks) exposure to a low temperature (4–6 ° C) or by the implantation of the brain of a previously chilled pupa. Unchilled diapause pupal brains were found to be incompetent to induce development when implanted into an unchilled pupa in diapause. The competence or incompetence of a pupal brain appeared to depend on the activity or inactivity of its neurosecretory cells. When active, the neurosecretory cells are responsible for the production of a hormone that is released via the corpora cardiaca and activates the prothoracic glands, which then produce the growth hormone, ecdysone, responsible for the initiation of development2. In the diapause pupa, the neurosecretory activity of the brain is suppressed3, as is its neural impulse activity4.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams, C. M., Biol. Bull., Wood's Hole, 90, 234 (1946).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Williams, C. M., Chemical Basis of Development, 794 (Johns Hopkins Press, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Williams, C. M., Biol. Bull., Wood's Hole, 110, 201 (1956).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Van der Kloot, W. G., Biol. Bull., Wood's Hole, 109, 276 (1955).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Highnam, K. C., Quart. J. Micro. Sci., 99, 73 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fraser, A., Quart. J. Micro. Sci., 100, 377 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mitsuhashi, J., and Fukaya, M., Jap. J. App. Entomol. Zool., 4, 127 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Highnam, K. C., and Lusis, O., Quart. J. Micro. Sci., 103, 73 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Beck, S. D., Biol. Bull., Wood's Hole, 122, 1 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Van der Kloot, W. G., Ann. Rev. Entomol., 5, 35 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CLOUTIER, E., BECK, S., McLEOD, D. et al. Neural Transplants and Insect Diapause. Nature 195, 1222–1224 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1038/1951222b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1951222b0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing