Flowering in sweet cherry in response to application of gibberellic acid

https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(89)90071-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Increasing dose of gibberellic acid (GA3, 0–150 mg l−1) reduced flowering of sweet cherry cultivars ‘Bing’ and ‘Lambert’ the year following treatment. Flowering was reduced to a greater extent on 1-year-old wood as compared to older wood. Treatment at the floral cup stage (approximately 2 weeks after bloom) had no effect on flowering. Treatment at the beginning of Stage III of fruit growth (approximately 21 days before harvest) resulted in the largest decrease of flowering of all the treatment times.

References (11)

  • T.J. Facteau et al.

    Firmness of sweet cherry fruit following multiple applications of gibberellic acid

    J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.

    (1985)
  • G.K. Goldwin et al.

    Improving fruit set of sweet cherry, Prunus avium L., cv. ‘Early Rivers’ with plant hormones

    J. Hortic. Sci.

    (1978)
  • J. Hull et al.

    Response of one-year-old cherry and mature bearing cherry, peach and apple trees to gibberellin

  • N.E. Looney et al.

    Some growth regulator effects on fruit quality, mesocarp composition, and susceptibility to postharvest surface marking of sweet cherry

    J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.

    (1980)
  • L.C. Luckwill

    The control of growth and fruitfulness of apple trees

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (15)

  • Improving 'Bing' sweet cherry fruit quality with plant growth regulators

    2011, Scientia Horticulturae
    Citation Excerpt :

    This response was consistent whether GAs were applied along or in combination with CPPU. This effect is consistent with many previous studies of foliar application of GA3 before harvest (Proebsting et al., 1973; Looney and Lidster, 1980; Choi et al., 2002; Facteau et al., 1985, 1989; Kappel and MacDonald, 2002,2007; Horvitz et al., 2003; Clayton et al., 2006; Lenahan et al., 2006, 2008; Cline and Trought, 2007). In both stage I and II, no significant differences in fruit shape (height, width, or height:width) between any treatment and the control were observed (data not shown).

View all citing articles on Scopus

Oregon State Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Paper No. 8440.

View full text