Regular paper
Folate chemotactic receptors in Dictyostelium discoideum II. Guanine nucleotides alter the rates of interconversion and the proportioning of four receptor states

https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4889(86)90214-4Get rights and content

Abstract

The ligand binding properties of folate chemotactic receptors on isolated membranes of Dictyostelium discoideum were analyzed. Three out of the four receptor states (BF, BS and BSS) were detected, showing rate constants and Kd values similar to those obtained for intact cells. Guanine nucleotides changed the proportioning of the receptor states as well as the rates of several conversions. (i) The transformation of BF into BS was inhibited by GDP but not by guanylyl imidodiphosphate (GuaPP[NH]P) or GTP. (ii) The number of BS sites was lowered by GTP and GuaPP[NH]P. (iii) The binding to BSS was lowered by GTP and GDP, but increased by GuaPP[NH]P. (iv) The rate of disappearance of BSS was increased by GTP, but not by GuaPP[NH]P. Effects of guanine nucleotides were not observed after treatment of the membrane preparations with 15 mg/ml bovine serum albumin. This treatment caused the detection of a binding type different from the types described previously. The affinity of this binding site was extremely high (Kd ≤ 0.2 nM for N10-methylfolic acid), while the dissociation was relatively slow (k−1 ≤ 3·10−4 s−1). It is proposed that bovine serum albumin uncouples the folate receptor from a guanine nucleotide regulatory (G) protein in an irreversible manner. A model is presented in which the four receptor states correspond to distinct interactions with a G protein and GDP or GTP.

References (33)

  • B. Varnum et al.

    Differentiation

    (1981)
  • J.M. Mato et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (1977)
  • P.J.M. Van Haastert

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1983)
  • P.N. Devreotes

    Dev. Biol.

    (1983)
  • R.J.W. De Wit et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1985)
  • J.M. Mato et al.

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1977)
  • P.J.M. Van Haastert et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1984)
  • R.J.W. De Wit et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1985)
  • V. Homburger et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1980)
  • C. Klein et al.

    Cell

    (1977)
  • M.L. Standaert et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1984)
  • D. Cassel et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1976)
  • N. Sevilla et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (1977)
  • B.H. Leichtling et al.

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1981)
  • P.J.M. Van Haastert et al.

    Exp. Cell Res.

    (1982)
  • P.J.M. Van Haastert

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1984)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Acanthamoeba and Dictyostelium Use Different Foraging Strategies

      2016, Protist
      Citation Excerpt :

      Signaling through these cAMP receptors continues during the multicellular phases of development and contributes to cell sorting within the aggregate and the differentiation of cells into the stalk or spores of the fruiting body (Kim et al. 1998; Louis et al. 1994; Saxe et al. 1993). In contrast, chemotactic movement associated with foraging is present during vegetative growth and enhanced during the first few hours of starvation (De Wit and Bulgakov 1986; Hadwiger et al. 1994; Pan et al. 1972, 1975). This chemotactic response requires receptors for pterin-like compounds such as folate.

    • The evolutionary origin of eukaryotic transmembrane signal transduction

      1988, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology -- Part A: Physiology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text