Relative X-ray transition probabilities to the K-shell
References (6)
Ark. Fys
(1955)Phys. Rev.
(1933)- et al.
Cited by (117)
Updated database, semi-empirical and theoretical calculation of Kβ/Kα intensity ratios for elements ranging from <inf>11</inf>Na to <inf>96</inf>Cm
2023, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data TablesRelative K X-ray intensity ratios of the first and second transition elements in the magnetic field
2020, Journal of Molecular StructureCitation Excerpt :When Table 2, Figs. 6 and 7 is looked at, it is seen that IKβ/IKα are different for all elements and as atomic number of elements increase, IKβ/IKα of the elements increase at all magnetic field values. This relation have seen some earlier works [13,14,16,32–34] and this ratio decreases with the increment of the magnetic field for all elements. Perişanoğlu et al. [15] have investigated the effects of external magnetic field (B = 0.5 T and 1 T) and exciting photon energies on IKβ/IKα of various alloy compositions of Ti–Ni transition metal alloys and they found that there is relationship between IKβ/IKα of Ti and Ni inTixNi1-x alloys and the external magnetic field.
Review of experimental photon-induced K<inf>β</inf>/K<inf>α</inf> intensity ratios
2020, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data TablesExperimental and theoretical determination of the Kα<inf>2</inf>/Kα<inf>1</inf> intensity ratio for zinc
2015, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative TransferDetermination of K shell fluorescence cross-section and K <inf>Β</inf>/K <inf>α</inf> intensity ratios for Fe, Se, Te, FeSe, FeTe and TeSe
2012, Radiation Physics and ChemistryK-shell X-ray fluorescence cross-sections and intensity ratios for some pure metals at 59.5 and 123.6 keV
2007, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and AtomsCitation Excerpt :The experimental K X-ray IKβ/IKα intensity ratios are also in agreement with the theoretical values calculated for these elements as given in Table 2. The average deviation from the experimental values of Hansen et al. [17] was found to be 3% in calculating the intensity ratio. The deviation was found to be 0.9% in the most reliable the theoretical values of Scofield [18].
- ††
Supported in part by the US Atomic Energy Commission.
- †
AEC predoctoral Fellow in Nuclear Engineering.