Elsevier

Utilities Policy

Volume 4, Issue 2, April 1994, Pages 113-119
Utilities Policy

Papers
Cherry picking and social dumping: Utilities in the 1990s

https://doi.org/10.1016/0957-1787(94)90004-3Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper explores a number of key aspects of the privatization of UK utilities. The social, economic and geographical effects of these changes are now manifesting themselves but have yet to be fully analysed. In this paper we argue that there are two key parts to this process: the ‘cherry picking’ of lucrative customers from utility markets and the ‘social dumping’ of marginal domestic consumers. These are closely associated with a growing unevenness of social and geographical development of utilities. In this paper we conclude by arguing that these issues need to be brought to the centre of current debates about the regulation of liberalized utility markets.

References (18)

  • S. Marvin

    Accessibility to utilities: water, energy and telecommunications

  • OFWAT

    Paying for water: a time for decisions

    (1990)
  • J.A. Tarr, ‘The evolution of urban infrastructure in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries’, in R. Hanson(ed),...
  • J.A. Tarr and G. Dupuy (eds), Technology and the Rise of the Networked City in Europe and America, Temple University...
  • J. Vickers et al.

    Privatization: An Economic Analysis

    (1989)
  • J.E. Sleeman

    British Public Utilities

    (1953)
  • G.L. Reid et al.

    Nationalized Industries

    (1970)
  • S. Marvin et al.

    Regional policy implications of utility regionalization

    Regional Studies

    (1993)
  • Rural Development Commission

    The Provision of Basic Utilities in Rural Areas

    Rural Research Series No 2

    (1990)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (70)

  • Double energy vulnerability: Spatial intersections of domestic and transport energy poverty in England

    2020, Energy Research and Social Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    Networked infrastructure that provides energy to the home has a complex spatiality [78]. In England, the economic liberalisation of infrastructure and markets in the energy sector over several decades and abandonment of universal tariff structures due to the privatisation of energy companies has led to fragmentation, with fewer cross subsidies between urban and rural areas [79]. In rural areas that are relatively expensive to supply, cross-subsidies from more lucrative urban areas have been dismantled.

  • ‘Getting the measure of fuel poverty’: The geography of fuel poverty indicators in England

    2018, Energy Research and Social Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    In cities, this has entrenched inequalities between those that are networked and connected, and those who are not. This inequality is often symbolised by the pre-payment meter, a means of paying for energy services that requires credit in advance, often used in low income households more likely to accrue debt [31,32]. In rural areas that are expensive to supply, cross-subsidies from more lucrative urban areas have been dismantled resulting in reliance upon expensive fuel types (primarily oil) in isolated households not connected to the gas network [31].

  • Heating practices and self-disconnection among electricity prepayment meter consumers in New Zealand: A follow-up survey

    2016, Utilities Policy
    Citation Excerpt :

    This indicates that this income-deprived group may not be receiving or applying for entitled benefits. While the number of those receiving outside help to pay for electricity decreased slightly from the previous survey, those receiving a grant or loan from friends or family increased, showing that the burden of assistance for this essential service has been shifting from the public to the private sphere (Graham et al., 1994). Changes made to the welfare system, which came into effect during the mailing period of the first survey,2 included changes to the assistance available to households for expenses such as electricity.

  • Assessing the consumers' willingness to adopt a prepayment metering system in Nigeria

    2015, Energy Policy
    Citation Excerpt :

    In spite of the rapid diffusion of the prepayment system globally, little is known about the factors determining consumers’ adoption. Although a number of studies have found that consumers using PPM are more likely to experience high rates of fuel poverty (Graham and Marvin, 1994) and that PPM for electricity is often used by low-income consumers with electricity debt or who have difficulty budgeting (Boardman and Fawcett, 2002; Brutscher, 2012; Howat and McLaughlin, 2012), the current diffusion of PPM in Northern Ireland has, however, suggested less correlation between low-income and PPM use.5 Moreover, most of these studies focus on existing prepayment users and on developed countries, whose micro- and macroeconomic structures differ significantly from those of developing nations such as Nigeria.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text