Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T19:16:22.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hong Yung Lee replies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reply
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 70 , June 1977 , pp. 399 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. For the types of the Red Guard organization, see Lee, Hong Yung “Utility and limitation of the Red Guard publication as source materials: a bibliographical survey” Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. XXXIV, No. 3 (05 1975), pp. 779–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2. For instance, see Erh-chi chan-pao in Honan and Hsi-chiang nu-t'ao in Kwangsi.

3. For instance, see: Shou-tu hung-wei-ping pao, 9 06 1967 (Nos. 36 and 37)Google Scholar and Shou-tu hung-wei-ping pao, 11 06 1967 (New Issue, No. 3) for PekingGoogle ScholarPubMed; Chan chung nan, 3 August 1968 and Hung-ch'i t'ung-hsun, 07 1968 for Kwangtung, Google Scholar; Tung-feng chan-pao, 9 October 1967 and Harbin feng-lei, 15 12 1967 for Harbin, Google Scholar; Wu-chou Lien-chih, 8 June 1968 and Hsi-chang nu-t'ao, 06 1968 for Kwangsi, Google Scholar; Erh-chi chan pao, 1 06 1967 for Honan, Google Scholar; Paiwan kung-nung, 15 December 1967 and Hung-se tsao-fan-tuan, 22 03 1967 for Hopei, Google Scholar; and Kao-yuan chan-pao, 30 October 1967 and Hung-se tsao-fan pao, 15 02 1967 for Tibet, Google Scholar. Liaoning was exceptional in that the mass organizations split into three factions; yet two of them were radical andone was conservative. Liaoning chan-pao, 6 September 1967.

4. Chien-hsun, 12 December 1967.

5. Kuan-yu ch'ing-li chieh-chih tui-wu te tzu-liao hui pien, p. 49.

6. For instance, see San-lun-che chan-pao, 20 December 1967.

7. Hsiao-p'ing, 9 December 1967.

8. Hung-ch'i p'ing-lun, July 1968.

9. For instance, see “The counterrevolutionary crimes of the August 1 Fighting Corps”, SCMP. No. 3,905 (23 03 1967), pp. 1–4Google Scholar.

10. Kuan-yu ch'ing-li chieh-chih tui-wu te tzu-liao hui-pien.

11. Kuang-tung chan-pao, 22 February 1967 and Kuang-tung hung-wei-ping, 10 February 1967.

12. Feng, Hai, An Account of the Cultural Revolution in the Canton Area (Hong Kong: Union Research Institute, 1971), pp. 120,151–52, 237, 265Google Scholar.

13. Ibid. p. 222, Wen-ko p'ing-lun, January 1968.