Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T17:08:00.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bias in Chinese Economic Statistics: The Case of the Typical Example Investigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

S. Lee Travers
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A large number of statistics on the Chinese economy are generated through complete enumeration. Essentially the entire rural population, for example, is organized into agricultural collectives or state farms, and these units are required to submit standardized reports on a range of economic and social activity. They report on several categories of production, on financial flows, and on matters such as births and deaths. There are, of course, areas of interest to Chinese planners and social scientists, the data for which are not routinely compiled at local levels, e.g. data on family consumption patterns. In China, as elsewhere, sample surveys are used to fill such information gaps. Such surveys are commonly conducted using the technique of “typical example investigation” (dianxing diaocha). While well established in China, this survey technique, which might be characterized as stratified non-random sampling, is increasingly challenged as inadequate to the needs of economic science. One recently published large scale typical example investigation generated some statistics for which are available population parameters derived from complete enumeration. Comparison of the results of the typical example investigation and the complete enumeration reveal a strong bias in the sample. The bias is shown to result from the role of social statistics in China, and provides a clear illustration of the contradictions in that role.

Type
Research Article
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 91 , September 1982 , pp. 478 - 485
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. The following account of Soviet influence in this area is drawn from Shiguang, Dai, “Jiji fazhan kexuede tongjixue wei wo guo zaori shixian sige xiandaihua fuwu,” in Jingji yanjiu, No. 2 (1979), p. 63–67.Google Scholar

2. Yiren, Zou, “Shilun tongjixuede xingzhi ji qiyu shuli tongjixuede guanxi,” in Jingji yanjiu, No. 1 (1980), p. 68–70.Google Scholar

3. Shehui jingji tongjixue yuanli bianxiezhu, op. cit. p. 21–22.Google Scholar

4. Xinquan, Liu, “Dianxing diaocha dui tongji gongzuo zhongde zuoyong,” in Tongji, 1981, No. 1 (04 1981), p. 24–26.Google Scholar

5. Yefang, Sun, “Jiaqiang tongji gongzuo gaige tongji benzhi,” in Jingji guanli, No. 2 (1981), p. 5.Google Scholar

6. Qian, Yu, Qunsheng, Fu, and Yueda, Mo, “Dierjiang: Shehui jingji tongjide tedian yu zuoyong,” in Tongji, No. 1 (1981), p. 35–36.Google Scholar

7. See Yefang, Sun, op. cit. p. 3–5Google Scholar, for a brief but illuminating review of the SSB history.

8. Shehui jingji tongjixue yuanli bianxiezhu, op. cit. p. 19.Google Scholar

9. State Planning Commission, Statistical Office, Nongye tongji zhuyao zhibiao jiexiao, 1977.Google Scholar

10. The 29 provincial level administrative units under the direct control of the central government had, in 1980, 209 prefectural level administrative units and 2, 137 county level administrative units. See Zhongguo jingji nianjian 1981 (Jingji guanli zazhishe chuban, 1981.) p. 35.Google Scholar

11. Administrative units below the county level are, in descending order or rank, the commune, the production brigade, and the production team. At the end of 1979 there were 53,348 communes, about 699,000 brigades, and 5,154,000 teams. Ibid. p. VI–9.

12. See Shehui jingji tongjixue yuanli bianxiezhu, Shehui jingji tongjixue yuanli (Zhongguo caizheng jingji chubanshe, Beijing, 1980), p. 80.Google Scholar

13. Renmin ribao, 3 01 1981, p. 4.Google Scholar

14. Reported in Zhongguojingjinianjian 1981, op cit. p. IV–247.Google Scholar

15. Renmin ribao, 27 12 1980, p. 2.Google Scholar