Skip to main content
Log in

Chromatin structure variation in successful and unsuccessful arbuscular mycorrhizas of pea

  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Lincoln and Frisson varieties of endomycorrhiza-forming pea plants and isogenic mycorrhiza-resistant Frisson mutant (P2) plants were inoculated withGlomus mosseae. Nuclei released from inoculated and non-inoculated (control) roots were analysed for chromatin structure and activity using flow cytometric techniques. Chromatin accessibility to the specific DNA fluorochrome DAPI at saturating and non-saturating concentrations was measured. DNA fluorescence of nuclei of mycorrhizal Lincoln and wild genotype Frisson plants was significantly increased, compared to the controls, at saturating and, more strongly, at non-saturating DAPI concentrations. In contrast, the nuclei of inoculated P2 mutant roots showed a much lower increase in fluorescence, compared to uninoculated controls. Nuclei released from mycorrhiza-infected Lincoln roots were more sensitive to DNase I than those of uninfected ones. These results indicate a dramatic increase in that portion of the genome which can be transcribed in response to AM infection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AM:

arbuscular mycorrhizas

CRBCs:

chicken red blood cells

CV:

coefficient of variation

DAPI 4′:

6-diamidino-2-phenylindole

DNase I:

deoxyribonuclease I

EDTA:

ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid

FCM:

flow cytometry

TMN:

Tris MgCl2 NaCl buffer

References

  • Balestrini R, Berta G, Bonfante P (1992) The plant nucleus in mycorrhizal roots: positional and structural modifications. Biol Cell 75: 235–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassi P (1990) Quantitative variations of nuclear DNA during plant development: a critical analysis. Biol Rev 65: 185–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Berta G, Fusconi A, Sgorbati S, Trotta A, Scannerini S (1986) Preliminary results on the ploidy and fine structure of the nuclei of the host cells in a VA mycorrhiza. Giorn Bot Ital 120: 84–86

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Sgorbati S, Trotta A, Fusconi A, Scannerini S (1989) Correlations between host-endophyte interactions and structural changes in host cell chromatin in a VA mycorrhiza. In: Nardon P, Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Grenier AM, Margulis L, Smith DC (eds) Endocytobiology IV. INRA Press, Paris, pp 153–157

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Sgorbati S, Soler V, Fusconi A, Trotta A, Citterio A, Bottone MG, Sparvoli E, Scannerini S (1990) Variations in chromatin structure in host nuclei of a vesicular arbuscular mycorrhiza. New Phytol 114: 199–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair DA, Peterson RL, Bowley SR (1988) Nuclear DNA content in root cells ofLotus andTrifolium colonized by the VAM fungus,Glomus versiforme. New Phytol 109: 167–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonaly J, Bre MH, Lefort-Tran M, Mestre JC (1987) A flow cytometric study of DNA staining in situ in exponentially growing and stationaryEuglena gracilis. Cytometry 8: 42–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caers LI, Peumans WJ, Carlier AR (1979) Preformed and newly synthesized messenger RNA in germinating wheat embryos. Planta 144: 491–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowden RR, Curtis SK (1981) Microfluorimetric investigation of chromatin structure 1. Evaluation of nine DNA-specific fluorochromes as probes of chromatin organization. Histochemistry 72: 11–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darzynkiewicz Z (1990) Probing nuclear chromatin by flow cytometry. In: Melamed MR, Lindmo T, Mendelsohn ML (eds) Flow cytometry and sorting, 2nd edn. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 315–340

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Traganos F, Kapuscinski J, Staiano-Coico L, Melamed MR (1984) Accessibility of DNA in situ to various fluorochromes: relationship to chromatin changes during erythroid differentiation of Friend leukemia cells. Cytometry 5: 355–363

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duc G, Trouvelot A, Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Gianinazzi S (1989) First report of non-mycorrhizal plant mutants (Myc) obtained in pea (Pisum sativum L.) and fababean (Vicia faba L.). Plant Sci 60: 215–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumas E, Tahiti-Alaoui A, Gianinazzi S, Gianinazzi-Pearson V (1990) Observations on modifications in gene expression with VA endomycorrhiza development in tobacco: qualitative and quantitative changes in protein profiles. In: Nardon P, Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Grenier AM, Margulis L, Smith DC (eds) Endocytobiology IV. INRA Press, Paris, pp 153–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenson D, Darzynkiewicz Z, Jost L, Janca F, Ballachey B (1986) Changes in accessibility of DNA to various fluorochromes during spermatogenesis. Cytometry 7: 45–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giovannetti M, Mosse B (1980) An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol 84: 489–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Grellet F, Delseny M, Guitton Y (1977) Histone content of germinating pea embryo chromatin decreases as DNA replicates. Nature 267: 724–726

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross DS, Garrard WT (1988) Nuclease hypersensitive sites in chromatin. Annu Rev Biochem 57: 159–197

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen JK, Munch-Peterson B, Christiansen J Jorgensen K (1986) Flow cytometric discrimination of mitotic cells: resolution of M, as well as G1, S, and G2 phase nuclei with mitramycin, propidium iodide, and ethidium bromide after fixation with formaldehyde. Cytometry 7: 54–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latt SA, Langlois RG (1990) Fluorescent probes of DNA microstructure and DNA synthesis. In: Melamed MR, Lindmo T, Mendelsohn ML (eds) Flow cytometry and sorting, 2nd edn. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 249–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzini G, Giordano P, Riccardi A, Montecucco CM (1983) A flow cytometric study of the propidium iodide staining kinetics of human leukocytes and its relationship with chromatin structure. Cytometry 3: 443–448

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagl W (1985) Chromatin organization and control of gene activity. Int Rev Cytol 94: 21–56

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • — (1992) I. Replication. In: Behnke HD, Esser K, Kubitzki K, Runge M, Ziegler H (eds) Progress in botany, vol 53. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 166–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellicciari C, Marchese G, Bottone MG, Manfredi Romanini MG (1987) Kinetics of DNase I digestion of interphase chromatin in differentiated cell nuclei of the mouse: a flow cytometric study. Basic Appl Histochem 31: 501–509

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JM, Hayman DS (1970) Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular arbuscular fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans Br Mycol Soc 55: 158–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice DA, Tobey RA, Gurley LR (1985) Cell cycle variations in chromatin structure detected by DNase I. Exp Cell Res 157: 242–252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roti Roti JL, Wright WD, Higashikubo R, Dethlefsen LA (1985) DNase I sensitivity of nuclear DNA measured by flow cytometry. Cytometry 6: 101–108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schellenbaum L, Gianinazzi S, Gianinazzi-Pearson V (1993) Comparison of acid soluble protein synthesis in roots of endomycorrhizal wild typePisum sativum and corresponding isogenic mutants. J Plant Physiol 141: 2–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Sgorbati S, Levi M, Sparvoli E, Trezzi F, Lucchini G (1986) Cytometry and flow cytometry of 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-stained suspensions of nuclei released from fresh and fixed tissues of plants. Physiol Plant 68: 471–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatter RE, Gray JC (1991) Chromatin structure of plant genes. Oxford Surv Plant Mol Cell Biol 7: 115–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurr AR (1969) A low viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res 26: 31–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toth R, Miller RM (1984) Dynamics of arbuscule development and degeneration in aZea mays mycorrhiza. Amer J Bot 71: 449–460

    Google Scholar 

  • van Holde KE (1989) Chromatin structure and transcription. In: Rich A (ed) Chromatin. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 355–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Weintraub H, Groudine M (1976) Chromosomal subunits in active genes have an altered conformation. Science 193: 848–856

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod S (1982) Active chromatin. Nature 297: 289–295

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wyss P, Mellor RB, Wiemken A (1990) Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas of wild-type soybean and non-nodulating mutants withGlomus mosseae contain symbiosis-specific polypeptides (mycorrhizins), immunologically cross-reactive with nodulins. Planta 182: 22–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Zared KS, Yamamoto KR (1984) Reversible and persistent changes in chromatin structure accompany activation of a glucocorticoid dependent enhancer element. Cell 38: 29–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sgorbati, S., Berta, G., Trotta, A. et al. Chromatin structure variation in successful and unsuccessful arbuscular mycorrhizas of pea. Protoplasma 175, 1–8 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01403279

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01403279

Keywords

Navigation