Skip to main content
Log in

An experimental appraisal of the equi-strain multi-surface hardening model

  • Contributed Papers
  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Comparisons are made between predictions from a multi-surface representation of the hardening behaviour in polycrystalline materials and experimental results. In general, good agreement is found for the deformation behaviour, i.e. non-linear stress-strain response, a rotation in the plastic strain path and the Bauschinger effect, under stress paths which change direction. It is further shown that the model supplies more reliable predictions to the observed behaviour than those corresponding to the isotropic and kinematic hardening rules. The valid range of application for the latter rules is also clarified. The limitations of the multi-surface model, in particular, are discussed in respect of initial material anisotropy and from a cyclic loading test with ratcheting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A, n :

constants in the hardening law

E, v :

elastic constants

f :

equi-strain surface function

F :

isotropic hardening function

p :

plastic strain increment ratio

R :

stress ratio

Y :

uniaxial yield stress

α, β, ϑ:

translation components

δ, τ:

normal and shear stress components

\(\bar \sigma\) :

equivalent stress

δ':

deviatoric stress

ε, γ:

normal and shear strain components

\(\bar \varepsilon ^P\) :

equivalent plastic strain

\(\Delta \bar \varepsilon ^P , d\bar \varepsilon ^P\) :

equivalent plastic strain increments

σ:

Kronecker delta

i, j, k :

tensor subscripts

r, ϑ,z :

polar co-ordinate subscripts

q :

subscript denoting surface number

e, P, t :

strain superscrips

References

  1. Rees, D. W. A.: A multi-surface representation of anisotropic hardening and comparisons with experiment. Proc. I. Mech. E.198 C (16), 269–284 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rees, D. W. A.: Yield surface motion and anisotropic hardening, in: Applied solid mechanics 1 (Tooth, A. S., Spence, J., eds.) pp. 159–189. United Kingdom: Elsevier Appl. Sci. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shiratori, E., Ikegami, K., Yoshida, F.: Analysis of stress-strain relations by use of an anisotropic hardening plastic potential. J. Mech. Phys. Sols.27, 213–229 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hill, R.: The mathematical theory of plasticity. Oxford University Press 1950.

  5. Rees, D. W. A.: Biaxial creep and plastic flow in anisotropic aluminium. Ph.D. thesis C.N.A.A. (United Kingdom), 1976.

  6. Rees, D. W. A.: An examination of yield surface distortion and translation. Acta Mech.52, 15–40 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ikegami, K.: An historical perspective of the experimental study of subsequent yield surface for metals — Parts 1 and 2, B.I.S.I. 14420, Sept. 1976, The Metals Soc. London [also J. Soc. Mat. Sci.24 (261), 491–505 (1975);24 (263), 709–719 (1975)].

  8. Rees, D. W. A.: Yield functions that account for the effects of initial and subsequent plastic anisotropy. Acta Mech.43, 223–241 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ziegler, H.: A modification to Prager's hardening rule. Quart. Appl. Math.17, 55–65 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mroz, Z.: Mathematical models of inelastic material behaviour. Solid Mech. Div., Univ. of Waterloo 1973.

  11. Taylor, G. I., Quinney, H.: The plastic distortion of metals. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc.230A, 323–362 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mair, W. M., Pugh, H. Ll. D.: Effect of prestrain on yield surfaces in copper. J. Mech. Eng. Sci.6, 150–163 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rogan, J., Shelton, A.: Effect of pre-stress on the yield and flow behaviour of En 25 steel. J. Strain Anal.4 (2), 138–161 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shahabi, S. N.: Creep and flow behaviour of steels under varying biaxial stresses. Ph.D. thesis, University of London 1971.

  15. Shahabi, S. N., Shelton, A.: The anisotropic yield, flow and creep behaviour of prestrained En 24 steel. J. Mech. Eng. Sci.17 (2), 93–104 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rees, D. W. A.: Applications of classical plasticity theory to non-radial loading paths, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A410, 443–475 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  17. McComb, H. G.: Some experiments concerning subsequent yield surfaces in plasticity. NASA Tech. Note D-396, June 1960.

  18. Shaw, F. S., Wycherley, G. W.: Experiments on the plasticity of metals I — The octrahedral shear stress loading criterion. Sruct. and Materials, Aero Res. Lab. Note 181, Melbourne, Australia 1950.

  19. Rees, D. W. A.: The neutral loading condition in classical plasticity theory. Int. J. of Plasticity, in press.

  20. Ohashi, Y., Kawai, M., Kaito, T.: Inelastic behaviour of type 316 stainless steel under multi-axial non-proportional cyclic stressings at elevated temperature. J. Eng. Mat. and Tech. ASME107, 101–109 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Moyar, G. J., Sinclair, G. M.: Cyclic strain accumulation under complex multi-axial loading, in: Joint Int. Conf. on Creep, I. Mech. E./ASME2 (35), 45–57 (1963).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

With 13 Figures

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rees, D.W.A. An experimental appraisal of the equi-strain multi-surface hardening model. Acta Mechanica 70, 193–219 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01174655

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01174655

Keywords

Navigation