Abstract
Experimental self-, cross- and interspecific pollinations were carried out inBulbophyllum weddellii, B. involutum andB. ipanemense (Orchidaceae). The last two species are closely related, butB. weddellii is somewhat more distant. The three species are self-compatible, with pollination by a vector necessary for fruit formation. In all crossing types, high rates of fruit abortion and formation of seeds without embryos were observed, particularly in interspecific crosses that involvedB. weddellii. Crosses between the more closely relatedB. involutum andB. ipanemense produced fruit formation rates and seed viability similar to those obtained in intraspecific crosses. These results agree with current hypotheses that suggest that interspecific crossing rates reflect phylogenetic proximity. Examination of pollen tube growth and aborted fruits suggests that a series of factors may be involved in the high abortion rate for fruits and large proportion of seeds without embryos. The low interspecific fertility noted forB. weddellii andB. involutum is important in the maintenance of isolation between these species that are sympatric, flower in the same period and share the same pollinators.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman J. D., Oliver J. C. M. (1985) Reproductive biology ofOncidium variegatum: moon phases, pollination, and fruit set. Amer. Orchid Soc. Bull. 54: 326–329.
Agnew J. D. (1986) Self-compatibility/incompatibility in some orchids of the subfamilyVandoideae. Pl. Breed. 97: 183–186.
Bertin R. I. (1990) Effects of pollination intensity inCampsis radicans. Amer. J. Bot. 77: 178–187.
Borba E. L., Semir J. (1998b)Bulbophyllum xcipoense (Orchidaceae), a new natural hybrid from the Brazilian ‘campos rupestres’: description and biology. Lindleyana: 13: 113–120.
Borba E. L., Semir J. (1998a) Wind-assisted fly pollination in threeBulbophyllum (Orchidaceae) species occurring in the Brazilian ‘campos rupestres’. Lindleyana 13: 203–218.
Borba E. L., Semir J. (1999) Temporal variation in pollinarium size after its removal in species ofBulbophyllum: a different mechanism preventing self-pollination inOrchidaceae. Plant Syst. Evol. 217: 197–204.
Catling P. M. (1982) Breeding systems of northeastern North AmericanSpiranthes (Orchidaceae). Canod. J. Bot. 60: 3017–3039.
Christensen D. E. (1992) Notes on the reproductive biology ofStelis argentata Lindl. (Orchidaceae: Pleurothallidinae) in eastern Ecuador. Lindleyana 7: 28–33.
Dafni A., Calder D. M. (1987) Pollination by deceit and floral mimesis inThelymitra antennifera (Orchidaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 158: 11–22.
Dressler R. L. (1981) The orchids: natural history and classification. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Dressler R. L. (1993) Phylogeny and classification of the orchid family. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Faulkner J. S. (1973) Experimental hybridization of north-west European species inCarex sectionAcutae (Cyperaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 67: 233–253.
Gonzáles-Dias N., Ackerman J. D. (1988) Pollination, fruit set, and seed production in the orchid,Oeceoclades maculata. Lindleyana 3: 150–155.
Hauser T. P., Loeschcke V. (1996) Drought stress and inbreeding depression inLychnis flos-cuculi (Caryophyl-laceae). Evolution 50: 1119–1126.
Hogenboom N. G. (1975) Incompatibility and incongruity: two different mechanisms for the non-functioning of intimate partner relationships. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B., Biol. Sci. 188: 361–375.
Iannotti M. A., Stort M. N. S., Marin-Morales M. A. (1987) O sistema reprodutivo deEpidendrum rigidum Jacq. (Orchidaceae). Ci. & Cult. 39: 641–644.
Johansen B. (1990) Incompatibility inDendrobium (Orchidaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 103: 165–196.
Johri B. M., Vasil K. (1961) Physiology of pollen. Bot. Rev. 27: 325–381.
Lloyd D. G. (1980) Sexual strategies in plants. I. An hypothesis of serial adjustment of maternal investment during one reproductive session. New Phytol. 86: 69–79.
Marshall D. L., Folsom M. W. (1991) Mate choice in plants: an anatomical to population perspective. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22: 37–63.
Martin F. W. (1959) Staining and observing pollen tubes in the style by means of fluorescence. Stain Technol. 34: 125–128.
Mehrloff L. A. (1983) Pollination in the genusIsotria (Orchidaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 70: 1444–1453.
Nettancourt D. (1977) Incompatibility in angiosperms. Springer, Heidelberg New York Berlin.
Niesenbaum R. A., Casper B. B. (1994) Pollen tube numbers and selective fruit maturation inLindera benzoin. Amer. Naturalist 144: 184–191.
Pavanelli E. A. S., Stort M. N. S. (1985) Cruzamentos artificiais em plantas deEpidendrum nocturnum Jacq. (Orchidaceae). Ci. & Cult. 37: 1164–1168.
Pedersen H. A. (1995) Anthecological observations onDendrochilum longibracteatum — a species pollinated by facultatively anthophilous insects. Lindleyana 10: 19–28.
Pijl L. van der, Dodson C. H. (1966) Orchid flowers: their pollination and evolution. University of Miami Press, Coral Gables.
Richards A. J. (1986) Plant breeding systems. Allen & Unwin, London.
Sanford W. W. (1964) Sexual compatibility relationship inOncidium and related genera. Amer. Orchid Soc. Bull. 33: 1035–1048.
Sanford W. W. (1967) Sexual compatibility relationship inOncidium and related genera — part II. Amer. Orchid Soc. Bull. 36: 114–122.
Sazima M. (1978) Polinização por moscas emBulbophyllum warmingianum Cogn. (Orchidaceae), na Serra do Cipó, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Revista Brazil. Bot. 1: 133–138.
Scacchi R., De Angelis G., Lanzana P. (1990) Allozime variation among and within elevenOrchis species (fam.Orchidaceae), with special reference to hybridization aptitude. Genetica 81: 143–150.
Selberg O. (1989) Genome analysis, phylogeny, and classification. Plant Syst. Evol. 166: 159–171.
Stephenson A. G. (1981) Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Annual. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12: 253–279.
Stort M. N. S. (1972) Estudos em híbridos F1 artificiais de orquídeas. Ciên. Cult. 24: 847–851.
Stort M. N. S. (1973) Natural pollination inCattleya loddigesii Lindl. Amer. Orchid Soc. Bull. 42: 606–608.
Stort M. N. S. (1976) Cruzamentos artificiais entre plantas diplóides e tetraplóides deCattleya bicolor Lindl. Ciên. Cult. 28: 1208–1211.
Stort M. N. S. (1982) Cruzamentos artificiais envolvendo espécies do gêneroCattleya, subgênerosMonophyllae eCattleya (Orchidaceae). Ciên. Cult. 35: 1481–1485.
Stort M. N. S. (1986) Fertilidade de cruzamentos e relação filogenética entre algumas espécies do gêneroCattleya (Orchidaceae). Revista Brazil. Bot. 9: 69–73.
Stort M. N. S., Galdino G. L. (1984) Self and cross-pollination in some species of the genusLaelia Lindl. (Orchidaceae). Revista Brazil. Genet. 7: 671–676.
Swamy B. G. L. (1949) Embryological studies in theOrchidaceae. II. Embryogeny. Amer Midland Naturalist 41: 202–232.
Tremblay R. L. (1994) Frequency and consequences of multi-parental pollinations ofCypripedium calceolus var.pubescens (Orchidaceae). Lindleyana 9: 161–167.
Weiblen G. D., Brehm B. G. (1996) Reproductive strategies and barriers to hybridization betweenTellima grandiflora andTolmeia menziesii (Saxifraceae). Amer. J. Bot. 83: 910–918.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Borba, E.L., Shepherd, G.J. & Semir, J. Reproductive systems and crossing potential in three species ofBulbophyllum (Orchidaceae) occurring in Brazilian ‘campo rupestre’ vegetation. Pl Syst Evol 217, 205–214 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984366
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984366