Skip to main content
Log in

Allozyme divergence among species ofWolffia (Lemnaceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The genusWolffia was surveyed electrophoretically at 14 allozyme loci. A total of 133 clones representing 10 of the 11 recognized species was examined. Genetic identities among most pairs of species are zero, with non-zero values ranging from 0.14 to 0.40.Wolffia angusta and the newly describedW. neglecta show the highest similarity, and the former species has an identity of 0.14 withW. australiana. The next highest similarity (0.34) occurs betweenW. globosa of Southeast Asia andW. cylindracea of southern Africa, which until recently, had generally been viewed as members of the same species. Other species showing some common alleles are members of a complex involvingW. arrhiza, W. columbiana, W. cylindracea, andW. globosa. WithinW. arrhiza, plants from South Africa and Europe are easily distinguished electrophoretically because each contains unique alleles at two loci. Strains from other parts of Africa vary at these loci and are not totally distinct from either the plants from South Africa or from Europe. Species ofWolffia are much more divergent at allozyme loci than the majority of congeners of flowering plants. This suggests that the species are quite old and that the difficulties in distinguishing taxa morphologically are the result of reduction rather than lack of divergence due to recent speciation. Because of the lack of shared alleles between the majority of species pairs inWolffia, enzyme electrophoresis provides limited resolution of species relationships in the genus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Crawford, D. J., 1983: Phylogenetic and systematic inferences from electrophoretic studies. — InTanksley, S. D., Orton, T. J., (Eds): Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding,A. pp. 257–287. — Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1989: Enzyme electrophoresis and plant systematics. — InSoltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., (Eds): Isozymes in plant biology, pp. 146–164. — Portland: Dioscorides Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1993: Allozyme studies inSpirodela (Lemnaceae): variation among conspecific clones and divergence among the species. — Syst. Bot.18: 389–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1987: Allozyme divergence and the evolution ofDendroseris (Compositae: Lactuceae) on the Juan Fernandez Islands. — Syst. Bot.12: 435–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Hartog, C., Van der Plas, F., 1972: The Australian species ofWolffia (Lemnaceae). — Blumea20: 151–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, L. D., 1977: Electrophoretic evidence and plant systematics. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.64: 161–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1981: Gene number of species ofAstereae that have different chromosome number. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA78: 3726–3729.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1982: Conservation and duplication of isozymes in plants. — Science216: 373–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landolt, E., 1986: The family ofLemnaceae — a monographic study. 1. — Veröff. Geobot. Inst. ETH, Stiftung Rübel (Zürich)71: 1–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1994: Taxonomy and ecology of sectionWolffia of the genusWolffia. — Veröff. Geobot. Inst. ETH, Stiftung Rübel (Zürich)60: 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1980: List of the studiedLemnaceae samples: origin and chromosome numbers. — Veröff. Geobot. Inst. ETH, Stiftung Rübel (Zürich)70: 205–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Les, D. H., 1991: Genetic diversity in the monoecious hydrophileCeratophyllum. — Amer. J. Bot.78: 1070–1082.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liston, A. A., Rieseberg, L. H., Elias, T. S., 1989: Morphological stasis and molecular divergence in the intercontinental disjunct genusDatisca (Datiscaceae). — Aliso12: 525–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M., 1972: Genetic distance between populations. — Amer. Naturalist106: 283–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triest, L., 1991: Enzyme polymorphism and its relationships to biological features in aquatic plants (including a comparison with terrestrial plants). — InTriest, L., (Ed.): Isozymes in water plants, pp. 201–204. — Opera Bot. Belg.4.

  • Urbanska-Worytkiewicz, K., 1980: Cytological variation within the family ofLemnaceae. — Veröff. Geobot. Inst. ETH, Stiftung Rübel (Zürich)70: 30–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasseur, L., Aarssen, L. W., Bennett, T., 1993: Allozymic variation in local apomictic populations ofLemna minor (Lemnaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.80: 974–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeden, N. F., Wendel, J. F., 1989: Genetics of plant isozymes. — InSoltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., (Eds): Isozymes in plant biology, pp. 46–72. — Portland: Dioscorides Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendel, J. F., Weeden, N. F., 1989: Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. — InSoltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., (Eds): Isozymes in plant biology, pp. 5–45. — Portland: Dioscorides Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crawford, D.J., Landolt, E. Allozyme divergence among species ofWolffia (Lemnaceae) . Pl Syst Evol 197, 59–69 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984632

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984632

Key words

Navigation