Abstract
Representatives of seven genera from five tribes ofRubiaceae have been compared in respect to a non-coding intergene cpDNA region of about 1000 bp, situated between the atpB and the rbcL genes. The resulting most parsimonious PAUP cladogram corresponds very well with one based on total cpDNA restriction site data obtained byBremer & Jansen (1991). The two different molecular analyses thus corroborate each other and contribute to an improved systematic arrangement of the large family, e.g., in respect to placing the tribeHedyotideae clearly into the subfamilyRubioideae, closer toRubieae than toPsychotrieae.
References
Bremekamp, C. E. B., 1966: Remarks on the position, the delimitation, and the subdivision of theRubiaceae. — Acta Bot. Neerl.15: 1–33.
Bremer, B., Jansen, R. K., 1991: Comparative restriction site mapping of chloroplast DNA implies new phylogenetic relationships wihtinRubiaceae. — Amer. J. Bot.78: 198–213.
—, 1992: Phylogeny of theRubiaceae and theLoganiaceae: Congruence or conflict between morphological and molecular data? — Amer. J. Bot.79: 1171–1184.
Manen, J.-F., Natali, A., Ehrendorfer, F., 1994: Phylogeny ofRubiaceae-Rubieae inferred from the sequence of a cpDNA intergene region. — Pl. Syst. Evol. 190: 195–211.
Robbrecht, E., 1988: Tropical woodyRubiaceae. — Opera Bot. Belgica1: 1–271.
Schumann, K., 1891:Rubiaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien IV (4–5): 1–156. — Leipzig: Engelmann.
Verdcourt, B., 1958: Remarks on the classification of theRubiaceae. — Bull. Rijksplantentuin Bruss.28: 209–281.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ehrendorfer, F., Manen, JF. & Natali, A. cpDNA intergene sequences corroborate restriction site data for reconstructingRubiaceae phylogeny. Pl Syst Evol 190, 245–248 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986196
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986196