Skip to main content
Log in

A cladistic analysis of the tribeAstereae (Asteraceae) with notes on their evolution and subtribal classification

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

TheAstereae were surveyed and the genera arranged in 23 informal groups. The generic groups were used to sample representative genera for a cladistic analysis based on morphological characters. The resulting cladogram was used for discussion of evolution and subtribal classification within the tribe. The lower basic chromosome numbers x = 4, 5, 6, and 8 are interpreted as reductions from a primitive x = 9. The subtribeGrangeinae occupies a phylogenetically basal position as sister group to the rest of the tribe. This may be divided into two large groups, largely corresponding to the homochromousSolidagininae and to the heterochromousAsterinae sensu lato, i.e. including theBellidinae, Hinterhuberinae, Conyzinae, andBaccharidinae. The latter four subtribes are derived within theAsterinae, and hence reduced to synonymy. Several intercontinental relationships indicate that a geographical subdivision of the tribe should be avoided, although in our analysis most of the groups proved to be restricted to one of five major regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, L. G., 1979: A review of the genusSolenogyne (Asteraceae) in Australia and New Zealand. — Brunonia2: 43–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderberg, A. A., 1989: Phylogeny and reclassification of the tribeInuleae (Asteraceae). — Canad. J. Bot.67: 2277–2296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderberg, A. A., 1991a: Taxonomy and phylogeny of the tribeInuleae (Asteraceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.176: 75–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderberg, A. A., 1991b: Taxonomy and phylogeny of the tribePlucheeae (Asteraceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.176: 145–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderberg, A. A., 1991c: Taxonomy and phylogeny of the tribeGnaphalieae (Asteraceae). — Opera Bot.104: 1–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. C., 1964: Studies onPetradoria (Compositae): anatomy, cytology, taxonomy. — Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci.66: 632–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. C., 1966: Cytotaxonomic studies inChrysothamnus (Astereae-Compositae). — Amer. J. Bot.53: 204–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. C., 1970: Studies onBigelowia (Astereae-Compositae). 1. Morphology and taxonomy. — Sida3: 451–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. C., 1972: Studies onBigelowia (Astereae, Compositae). II. Xylary comparisons, woodiness, and paedomorphosis. — J. Arnold Arbor.53: 499–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. C., 1977: Studies onBigelowia (Asteraceae). III. Cytotaxonomy and biogeography. — Syst. Bot.2: 209–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. C., 1987:Boltonia apalachicolensis (Asteraceae): a new species from Florida. — Syst. Bot.12: 133–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. C., Weberg, P. S., 1974: The anatomy and taxonomy ofVanclevea (Asteraceae). — Great Basin Naturalist34: 151–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariza Espinar, L., 1980: Las especies centroargentinas deHysterionica (Compositae). — Darwiniana22: 537–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baagøe, J., 1978: Taxonomical application of ligule microcharacters inCompositae. II.Astereae. — Bot. Tidsskr.72: 129–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barroso, G. M., 1975:Baccharidiopsis—um genero novo da substriboBaccharidinae Hoffmann (TriboAstereae). — Sellowia27: 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, E., 1981: Revision der GattungChrysocoma L. (Asteraceae-Astereae). — Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München17: 259–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaman, J. H., 1957: The systematics and evolution ofTownsendia (Compositae). — Contr. Gray Herb.183: 1–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, G., 1873a:Compositae. — InBentham, G., Hooker, J. D., (Eds): Genera plantarum2, pp. 163–533. — London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, G., 1873b: Notes on the classification, history, and geographical distribution of theCompositae. — J. Linn. Soc. Bot.13: 335–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, S. F., 1924:Hemibaccharis, a new genus ofBaccharidinae. — Contr. U.S. Natl. Herb.20: 543–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, S. F., 1937:Tracyina, a new genus ofAsteraceae from Northern California. — Madroño4: 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, K., 1987: Tribal interrelationships of theAsteraceae. — Cladistics3: 210–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, K., 1990: Combinable component consensus. — Cladistics6: 369–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, K., 1993: Intercontinental relationships of African and South AmericanAsteraceae—a cladistic biogeographic analysis. — InGoldblatt, P., (Ed.): Biological relationships between Africa and South America. — New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • -Humphries, C. J., 1993: Generic monograph of theAnthemideae (Asteraceae). — Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Bot. (in press).

  • Bremer, K., Jansen, R. K., Karis, P. O., Källersjö, M., Keeley, S. C., Kim, K.-J., Michaels, H. J., Palmer, J. D., Wallace, R. S., 1992: A review of the phylogeny and classification of theAsteraceae. — Nordic J. Bot.12: 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. K., Clark, W. D., 1982: Taxonomy ofHaplopappus sect.Gymnocoma (Compositae). — Syst. Bot.7: 199–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhl, J. J., Quinn, C. J., 1990: Cypsela anatomy in the “Cotuleae” (Asteraceae-Anthemideae). — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.102: 37–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbidge, N. T., 1982: A revision ofVittadinia A. Rich. (Compositae) together with reinstatement ofEurybiopsis DC. and description of a new genus,Camptacra. — Brunonia5: 1–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, A. L., 1946: El géneroHysterionica en el Uruguay en y la república Argentina. — Notas Mus. La Plata, Bot.11: 349–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, A. L., 1954: Las especies del género “Nardophyllum”. — Notas Mus. La Plata, Bot.17: 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, A. L., 1966: The genusLagenophora (Compositae). — Blumea14: 285–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, A. L., 1969: Compuestas nuevas de Patagonia. — Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot.11: 271–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chebataroff, P. J., 1981: Una nueva especie del géneroSommerfeltia (Compositae). — Hickenia1: 233–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheeseman, T. F., 1925: Manual of the New Zealand Flora, 2nd edn. — Wellington: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. D., 1979: The taxonomy ofHazardia (Compositae-Astereae). — Madroño26: 105–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A., 1947: Revision of the North American species ofErigeron, North of Mexico. — Brittonia6: 121–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuatrecasas, J., 1969: Prima Flora Colombiana, 3.Compositae-Astereae. — Webbia24: 1–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuatrecasas, J., 1970: Reinstatement of the genusLlerasia (Compositae). — Biotropica2: 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuatrecasas, J., 1977:Westoniella, a new genus of theAstereae from the Costa Rican paramos. — Phytologia35: 471–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuatrecasas, J., 1982: Miscellaneous notes on neotropical flora, XV. New taxa in theAstereae. — Phytologia52: 166–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuatrecasas, J., 1989: Un género nuevo deAstereae, Compositae, de Colombia. — Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid42: 415–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. L., 1948: Revision of the genusBrachycome Cass. — Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales73: 142–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. L., 1952: Revision of the genusCalotis R. Br. — Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales77: 146–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. H., (Ed.), 1975: Flora of Turkey5. — Edinburgh: The University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, D. C. D., 1965: A systematic study of the genusAstranthium (Compositae-Astereae). — Michigan, East Lansing: Publication of the Museum, Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, D. C. D., Beaman, J. H., 1963: The genusOlivaea (Compositae-Astereae). — Brittonia15: 86–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop, C. R., 1980: A revision ofIxiochlamys (Asteraceae-Astereae). — J. Adelaide Bot. Gard.2: 241–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler, A., 1888: Plantae Marlothianae. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.10: 242–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris, J. S., 1988: Hennig 86. Version 1.5. — Port Jefferson Station, New York: Published by the author.

  • Farris, J. S., 1989: The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. — Cladistics5: 417–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayed, A., 1979: Revision derGrangeinae (Asteraceae-Astereae). — Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München15: 425–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Given, D. R., 1969: Taxonomic notes on the genusCelmisia (Compositae). A synopsis of infrageneric categories inCelmisia (Astereae-Compositae). — New Zealand J. Bot.7: 389–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Given, D. R., 1973:Damnamenia gen. nov. A new subantarctic genus allied toCelmisia Cass. (Astereae-Compositae). — New Zealand J. Bot.11: 785–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Given, D. R., 1980: A taxonomic revision ofCelmisia coriacea (Forst. f.)Hook. f. and its immediate allies (Astereae-Compositae). — New Zealand J. Bot.18: 127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Given, D. R., 1984: A taxonomic revision ofCelmisia subgenusPelliculatae sectionPetiolatae (Compositae-Astereae). — New Zealand J. Bot.22: 139–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grau, J., 1970: Die GattungPolyarrhena Cass. (Asteraceae-Astereae). — Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München7: 347–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grau, J., 1973: Revision der GattungFelicia (Asteraceae). — Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München4: 195–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grau, J., 1977a:Astereae-systematic review. — InHeywood, V. H., Harborne, J. B., Turner, B. L., (Eds): The biology and chemistry of theCompositae 1, pp. 539–565. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grau, J., 1977b:Poecilolepis — Eine neue Gattung derAsteraceae-Astereae. — Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München13: 243–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grierson, A. J. C., 1967: The genusPsychrogeton (Compositae). — Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh27: 101–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, H. M., 1928: The genusHaplopappus. A phylogenetic study in theCompositae. — Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, H. M., Clements, F. C., 1923: The phylogenetic method in taxonomy. The North American species ofArtemisia, Chrysothamnus, andAtriplex. — Publ. Carnegie Inst. Washington326: 1–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harling, G., 1951: Embryological studies in theCompositae III:Astereae. — Acta Horti Berg.16: 73–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, R. L., 1990: A conspectus ofMachaeranthera (Asteraceae: Astereae). — Phytologia68: 439–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellwig, F. H., 1990: Die GattungBaccharis L. (Compositae-Asteraceae) in Chile. — Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München29: 1–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilliard, O. M., Burtt, B. L., 1973: Notes on some plants of Southern Africa chiefly from Natal: III. — Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh32: 364–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, O., 1890:Tubuliflorae-Astereae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien4(5), pp. 142–172. — Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. T., 1929: A systematic study of the genusLessingia Cham. — Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.16: 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J., Phillips, E. P., 1917: A revision of the genusPteronia (Compositae). — Ann. South African Mus.9: 277–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. D., 1975: A revision of the genusArchibaccharis Heering (Compositae-Astereae). — Phytologia32: 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, R. K., Holsinger, K. E., Michaels, H. J., Palmer, J. D., 1990: Phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast DNA restriction site data at higher taxonomic levels: an example from theAsteraceae. — Evolution44: 2089–2105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, C., Chen, Y. L., 1984: Taxonomic studies on the tribeSenecioneae (Compositae) of Eastern Asia. — Kew Bull.39: 205–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. G., 1980: A classification of the new world species ofAster (Asteraceae); Data on chromosome numbers inAster (Asteraceae), with comments on the status and relationships of certain North American species. — Brittonia32: 230–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. G., Smogor, A., 1983: Chromosome counts of and notes on some old world Asters (Asteraceae). — Phytologia53: 429–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. G., Young, D. A., 1983: Generic concepts ofAster (Asteraceae); a comparison of cladistic, phenetic, and cytological approaches. — Syst. Bot.8: 71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, D. D., 1958: Taxonomic notes on the California flora. — Aliso4: 102–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, D. H., Stuessy, T. F., 1981: Systematics ofIsocarpha (Compositae: Eupatorieae). — Syst. Bot.6: 258–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. M., Robinson, H., 1987: The genera of theEupatorieae (Asteraceae). — Lawrence, Kansas: Allen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komarov, V. L., (Ed.), 1959: Flora S.S.S.R.25. — Moscow, Leningrad: Akademija Nauk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koster, J. Th., 1966: TheCompositae of New Guinea I. — Nova Guinea24: 524–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lander, N. S., Barry, R., 1980a: Reinstatement of the genusKippistia F. Muell. (Asteraceae-Astereae). — Nuytsia3: 215–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lander, N. S., Barry, R., 1980b: A review of the genusMinuria DC. (Asteraceae-Astereae). — Nuytsia3: 221–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, M. A., 1979: Taxonomy of the genusAmphiachyris (Asteraceae-Astereae). — Syst. Bot.4: 178–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, M. A., 1982: Generic limits ofXanthocephalum, Gutierrezia, Amphiachyris, Gymnosperma, Greenella, andThurovia (Compositae-Astereae). — Syst. Bot.7: 405–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, M. A., 1983: Taxonomy ofXanthocephalum (Compositae-Astereae). — Syst. Bot.8: 305–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, M. A., 1985: Taxonomy ofGutierrezia (Compositae-Astereae) in North America. — Syst. Bot.10: 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, M. A., 1988: Generic relationships and taxonomy ofAcamptopappus (Compositae: Astereae). — Madroño35: 247–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, Y., Chen, Y. L., 1965: Genera nova del minus cognita familiaeCompositarum, II.Cavea W. W. Smith etSmall etNannoglottis Maxim. — Acta Phytotax. Sin.10: 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, Y., Chen, Y. L., 1973: Notulae de genereErigeron L. generibusque affinibus florae Sinicae. — Acta Phytotax. Sin.11: 399–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowrey, T. K., 1986: A biosystematic revision of HawaiianTetramolopium (Compositae-Astereae). — Allertonia4: 204–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom, G. L., 1980: A revision of the epappose species ofErigeron (Compositae-Astereae). — Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom, G. L., 1988a: Synopsis ofChaetopappa (Compositae-Astereae) with a new species and the inclusion ofLeucelene. — Phytologia64: 448–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom, G. L., 1988b:Baccharis sect.Baccharidastrum (Compositae-Astereae), including two monoecious and one dioecious species. — Phytologia65: 169–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom, G. L., 1989a: Taxonomy ofErigeron sect.Polyactis (Compositae: Astereae). — Phytologia66: 415–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom, G. L., 1989b: The separation ofTrimorpha (Compositae-Astereae) fromErigeron. — Phytologia67: 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom, G. L., 1989c: Infrageneric taxonomy of New WorldErigeron (Compositae-Astereae). — Phytologia67: 67–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom, G. L., 1989d: A new combination inStenotus (Compositae: Astereae). — Phytologia67: 113–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom, G. L., 1990a: Taxonomic summary ofEricameria (Asteraceae: Astereae), with the inclusion ofHaplopappus sects.Macronema andAsiris. — Phytologia68: 144–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom, G. L., 1990b: Taxonomy of the genusLaennecia (Asteraceae: Astereae). — Phytologia68: 205–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom, G. L., 1990c: Further definition ofConyza (Asteraceae: Astereae). — Phytologia68: 229–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom, G. L., 1990d: Taxonomy ofHeterotheca sect.Heterotheca (Asteraceae-Astereae) in Mexico, with comments on the taxa of the United States. — Phytologia69: 282–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom, G. L., 1991a: Taxonomy ofIsocoma (Compositae: Astereae). — Phytologia70: 69–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom, G. L., 1991b: Union ofBradburia withChrysopsis (Asteraceae: Astereae), with a phylogenetic hypothesis forChrysopsis. — Phytologia71: 109–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom, G. L., 1991c: Transfer ofAster kingii toTonestus (Asteraceae: Astereae). — Phytologia71: 122–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom, G. L., 1991d:Tomentaurum (Asteraceae: Astereae), a new genus of goldenaster from Chihuahua, Mexico. — Phytologia71: 128–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom, G. L., 1991e: Transfer ofHeterotheca bartletii toOsbertia (Asteraceae: Astereae). — Phytologia71: 132–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom, G. L., 1991f: A phylogenetic hypothesis for the goldenasters (Asteraceae: Astereae). — Phytologia71: 136–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom, G. L., 1991g: Two new species ofArchibaccharis (Asteraceae: Astereae) from Mexico with a reevaluation of sectional groupings in the genus. — Phytologia71: 152–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom, G. L., 1991h: Redefinition ofHesperodoria (Asteraceae: Astereae) and the segregation ofColumbiadoria, a new monotypic genus from the western United States. — Phytologia71: 244–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom, G. L., 1991i: Morphological definition of theGutierrezia group (Asteraceae: Astereae). — Phytologia71: 252–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom, G. L., Morgan, D. R., 1990: Reinstatement ofTonestus (Asteraceae: Astereae). — Phytologia68: 174–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom, G. L., Suh, Y., Morgan, D. R., Simpson, B. B., 1990:Xylothamia (Asteraceae-Astereae), a new genus related toEuthamia. — Sida14: 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, C. L., 1943: The genusAmphipappus Torr. andGray. — Amer. J. Bot.30: 481–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rechinger, K. H., (Ed.), 1982: Flora Iranica154. — Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, H., 1981: A revision of the tribal and subtribal limits of theHeliantheae (Asteraceae). — Smithsonian Contr. Bot.51: 1–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, H., 1983: A generic review of the tribeLiabeae (Asteraceae). — Smithsonian Contr. Bot.54: 1–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, H., Brettell, R. D., 1972: Tribal revision in theAsteraceae. I. The relationships ofGeissolepis. — Phytologia24: 299–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, H., Brettell, R. D., 1973a: Tribal revisions in theAsteraceae. V. The relationship ofRigiopappus. — Phytologia26: 69–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, H., Brettell, R. D., 1973b: Tribal revisions in theAsteraceae. X. The relationship ofPlagiocheilus. — Phytologia26: 159–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rommel, A., 1977: Die GattungAmellus L. (Asteraceae-Astereae). Systematischer Teil. — Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München13: 579–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rommel, A., 1979: Die GattungAmellus L. (Asteraceae-Astereae). Allgemeiner Teil. — Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München15: 243–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, M. J., 1990: Flexible phylogeny reconstruction: a review of phylogenetic inference packages using parsimony. — Syst. Zool.39: 414–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semple, J. C., 1981: A revision of the goldenaster genusChrysopsis (Nutt.)Ell. nom. cons. (Compositae-Astereae). — Rhodora83: 323–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semple, J. C., Blok, V. C., Heiman, P., 1980: Morphological, anatomical, habit, and habitat differences among the goldenaster generaChrysopsis, Heterotheca, andPityopsis (Compositae-Astereae). — Canad. J. Bot.58: 147–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semple, J. C., Bowers, F. D., 1985: A revision of the goldenaster genusPityopsis Nutt. (Compositae-Astereae). — Univ. Waterloo Biol. Ser.29: 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinners, L. H., 1946: Revision of the genusAphanostephus DC.; The genusDichaetophora A. Gray and its relationships. — Wrightia1: 90–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinners, L. H., 1949: Revision of the genusEgletes Cassini North of South America. — Lloydia12: 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieren, D. J., 1981: The taxonomy of the genusEuthamia. — Rhodora83: 551–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, V. C., 1978:Bellium corsicum n. sp. sowie Notizen über die GattungBellium (Asteraceae). — Bauhinia6: 279–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. B., 1965: Taxonomy ofHaplopappus, sectionIsopappus (Compositae). — Rhodora67: 217–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. B., 1981: New combinations inCroptilon (Compositae-Astereae). — Sida9: 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solbrig, O. T., 1960: The South American sections ofErigeron and their relation toCelmisia. — Contr. Gray Herb.188: 65–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solbrig, O. T., 1962: The South American species ofErigeron. — Contr. Gray Herb.191: 3–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solbrig, O. T., 1966: The South American species ofGutierrezia. — Contr. Gray Herb.197: 3–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solbrig, O. T., 1977: Chromosomal cytology and evolution in the family Compositae. — InHeywood, V. H., Harborne, J. B., Turner, B. L., (Eds): The biology and chemistry of theCompositae 1, pp. 267–281. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyermark, J. A., 1934: Studies inGrindelia. I. New species, varieties, and combinations ofGrindelia. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.21: 227–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirton, C. H., 1983: Nocturnal petal movements in theAsteraceae. — Bothalia14: 1003–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh, Y., Simpson, B. B., 1990: Phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast DNA in North AmericanGutierrezia and related genera (Asteraceae: Astereae). — Syst. Bot.15: 660–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, S. D., 1991: Infraspecific classification ofChloracantha spinosa (Benth.)Nesom (Asteraceae)Astereae. — Phytologia70: 382–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamainschyan, S. G., 1959:Conyzanthus. — InKomarov, V. L., (Ed.): Flora S.S.S.R.25, pp. 185–188, 583. — Moscow, Leningrad: Akademija Nauk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiele, E.-M., 1988: Bau und Funktion des Antheren-Griffel-Komplexes der Compositen. — Berlin: J. Cramer in Gebrüder Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. L., 1984: Taxonomy of the genusAphanostephus (Asteraceae-Astereae). — Phytologia56: 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. L., 1987: Taxonomic study ofMachaeranthera, sectionsMachaeranthera andHesperastrum (Asteraceae). — Phytologia62: 207–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. L., Sundberg, S. D., 1986: Systematic study ofOsbertia (Asteraceae-Astereae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.151: 229–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutin, T. G., Heywood, V. H., Burges, N. A., Moore, D. M., Valentine, D. H., Walters, S. M., Webb, D. A., (Eds), 1976: Flora Europaea4. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Horn, G. S., 1973: The taxonomic status ofPentachaeta andChaetopappa with a revision ofPentachaeta. — Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.65: 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, W. L., Herbst, D. R., 1987: A new species ofRemya (Asteraceae-Astereae) on Kauai and a review of the genus. — Syst. Bot.12: 601–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, T. J., 1977: The taxonomy ofXylorhiza (Asteraceae-Astereae). — Brittonia29: 199–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild, H., 1969: The genusNidorella Cass. — Bol. Soc. Brot.43: 209–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild, H., 1973: A new genus ofCompositae (Astereae) from the flora Zambesiaca area. — Garcia de Orta1: 67–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild, H., 1974: New and interestingCompositae from South-central Africa, 2. — Kirkia9: 293–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zardini, E. M., 1981: Contribuciones para una monografia del géneroConyza Less. II. Rehabilitación del géneroLaennecia Cass. — Darwiniana23: 159–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zardini, E. M., 1985: Revision del géneroNoticastrum (Compositae-Astereae). — Revista Mus. La Plata, Secc. Bot.13: 313–424.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xiaoping, Z., Bremer, K. A cladistic analysis of the tribeAstereae (Asteraceae) with notes on their evolution and subtribal classification. Pl Syst Evol 184, 259–283 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937439

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937439

Key words

Navigation