Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic systems of six species ofPlantago (Plantaginaceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Investigation of the genetic system of six species ofPlantago has revealed striking differences in their breeding and meiotic systems.Plantago patagonica is an inbreeder on account of preanthesis cleistogamy, whereasP. lanceolata is an obligate outbreeder, as it is self-incompatible.Plantago drummondii, P. lagopus, P. ovata, andP. major show mixed mating but in varying proportions. In terms of their energy budgets, outbreeding species invest more in floral advertisement and male function, while inbreeders invest more in female function. The contribution of the meiotic system to genetic variability, as revealed through recombination index, is more important in the inbreeding species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arroyo, M. T. K. de, 1973: Chiasma frequency evidence on the evolution of autogamy inLimnanthes floccosa (Limnanthaceae). — Evolution27: 679–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badr, A., El-Kholy, M. A., 1987: Chromosomal studies in the Egyptian flora II. Karyotype studies in the genusPlantago L. — Cytologia52: 725–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. C. H., Shore, J. S., 1987: Variation and evolution of breeding systems in theTurnera ulmifolia L. complex (Turneraceae). — Evolution41: 340–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, M., Haring, E. V. D., 1988: Gene flow inPlantago II. Gene flow patterns and population structure. A simulation study. — Heredity61: 1–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • —, 1985: Protogyny inPlantago lanceolata populations: an adaptation to pollination by wind. — InJacquard, P., Heim, G., Antonovics, J., (Eds.): Genetic differentiation and dispersal in plants, pp. 327–338. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, B. G., 1980:Plantago multiscapa—a new species from Eremaean Australia and notes onPlantago in western Australia. — Telopea2: 77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, D., Charlesworth, B., 1981: Allocation of resources to male and female function in hermaphrodites. — Biol. J. Linn. Soc.15: 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craven, L. A., 1976: A review of the genusPlantago L. in New Guinea. — Contrib. Herb. Aust.13: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruden, R. W., 1977: Pollen-ovule ratios—a conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. — Evolution31: 32–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumaraswamy, A., Bawa, K. S., 1989: Sex allocation and mating systems in pigeonpea,Cajanus cajan (Fabaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.168: 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C. D., 1939: The evolution of genetic systems. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, P. E., Milne, C., Carillo, M. V., 1975: Correlation between the breeding system and recombination index in five species ofSenecio. — New Phytol.75: 619–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, V., 1952: Cytogenetics of the hybridGilia millaefolia ×G. achilleifolia I. Variation in meiosis and polyploidy rate as affected by nutritional and genetic conditions. — Chromosoma5: 372.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • —, 1971: Plant speciation. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S. K., 1976: The evolution of inbreeding in plants. — Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.7: 469–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, N., Rees, H., 1966: Chiasma frequencies and potential genetic variability ofLolium populations. — Nature211: 432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannenberg, L. W., Allard, R. W., 1967: Population studies in the predominantly self-pollinated species VIII. Genetic variability in theFestuca microstachys complex. — Evolution21: 227–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koul, A. K., Sharma, P. K., 1986: Cytogenetic studies ofPlantago ovata Forsk. and its wild allies. — InGupta, P. K., Bahl, J. R., (Eds.): Genetics and crop improvement, pp. 359–366. — Meerut: Rastogi & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., 1979: Sexual incompatibility in plants. — London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D. G., 1965: Evolution of self-compatibility and racial differentiation inLeavenworthia (Cruciferae). — Contr. Gray. Herb.195: 3–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff, R., 1969: Reproductive biology in relation to systematics. — Taxon18: 121–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack, R. B., 1978: Evolutionary aspects of wind pollination in the genusPlantago (Plantaginaceae). — New Phytol.81: 449–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. D., 1973: Inheritance of self-incompatibility inPlantago lanceolata. — Heredity30: 169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, D., 1982: The breeding system ofGilia achilleifolia. Variation in floral characteristics and outcrossing rate. — Evolution36: 352–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, N., Koul, P., Koul, A. K., 1990: Reproductive biology ofPlantago L. III. Floral adaptation to wind pollination inPlantago lagopus L. — Proc. Indian Acad. Sci.100: 393–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P. K., 1984: Cytogenetic studies on some Himalayan species of genusPlantago. — Ph.D. Thesis, Jammu University, Jammu.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984: Genetic diversity among Plantagos III. Primary trisomy inPlantago lagopus L. — Genetica64: 135–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., 1950: Variation and evolution in plants. — Calcutta: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1957: Self-fertilization and population variability in the higher plants. — Amer. Naturalist91: 337–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1974: Flowering plants—evolution above the species level. — London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1946: Artificial and natural hybrids in theGramineae, tribeHordeae. I.Elymus. Sitanion andAgropyron. — Amer. J. Bot.33: 338–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, W. R., 1988: Notes on New ZealandPlantago species. — New Zealand J. Bot.26: 321–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Damme, J. M. M., 1991: A restorer gene in gynodioeciousPlantago coronopus subject to selection in gametophytic and seedling stage. — Heredity66: 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuille, F., 1987: Reproductive biology of the genusDamasonium (Alismataceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.157: 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, K., Friso, B., Van Damme, J. M. M., 1988: Outcrossing rates and male sterility in natural populations ofPlantago coronopus. — Theor. Appl. Genet.76: 190–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, R., 1984: The evolution of self-pollination in granite outcrop species ofArenaria (Caryophyllaceae). I. Morphological correlates. — Evolution38: 804–816.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, N., Koul, P. & Koul, A.K. Genetic systems of six species ofPlantago (Plantaginaceae). Pl Syst Evol 181, 1–9 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937582

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937582

Key words

Navigation