Abstract
Evolutionary relationships and infra- and interspecific variability within the species ofTulipa sect.Eriostemones Boissier were studied. Measurements of 35 morphological characters were used for principal component and canonical variate analyses. Crossing experiments and chromosome counts were carried out. Two axes of morphological variation were encountered within the principal component plot. Variation of subsect.Biflores was traced along one axis, the species of subsect.Australes as well asSaxatiles were found along the other axis. The nomenclature of names of subsect.Biflores was considered on the basis of their geography, specific morphological characteristics and polyploidy. Conspecificity of names of all species was tested based on both morphology and crossability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archie, J. W., 1985: Methods for coding variable morphological features for numerical taxonomic analysis. — Syst. Zool.34: 326–345.
Blakey, D. H., Vosa, C. G., 1981: Heterochromatin and chromosome variation in cultivated species ofTulipa subg.Eriostemones (Liliaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.139: 47–55.
Bochantzeva, Z. P., 1982: Tulips: taxonomy, morphology, cytology, phytogeography and physiology. English translated edition byH. Q. Varekamp. — Rotterdam: Balkema.
Boissier, E., 1882: Flora Orientalis5, 191–201. — Geneva.
Bremer, K., Wanntorp, H.-E., 1978: Phylogenetic systematics in botany. — Taxon27: 317–329.
Funk, V. A., 1981: Special concerns in estimating plant phylogenies. — InFunk, V. A., Brooks, D. R., (Eds.): Advances in cladistics, pp. 73–86. — New York: New York Botanical Garden.
Gottschalk, W., 1976: Die Bedeutung der Polyploidie für die Evolution der Pflanzen. — Stuttgart: G. Fischer.
Hall, A. D., 1940: The genusTulipa. — London: The Royal Horticultural Society.
Hoog, M. H., 1973: On the origin ofTulipa. — InNapier, E., Platt, J. N. O., (Eds.): Lilies and otherLiliaceae, pp. 47–64. — London: Royal Horticultural Society.
Kroon, G. H., Jongerius, M. C., 1986: Chromosome numbers ofTulipa species and the occurrence of hexaploidy. — Euphytica35: 73–76.
Lewis, W. H., 1980: Polyploidy, biological relevance. — New York: Plenum Press.
Loidl, J., 1983: Some features of heterochromatin in wildAllium species. — Pl. Syst. Evol.143: 117–131.
Marais, W., 1984:Tulipa L. — InDavis, P. H., (Ed.): Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands8, pp. 302–311. — Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Nieuwhof, M., Raamsdonk, L. W. D. van, Eijk, J. P. van, 1990: Pigment composition in flowers ofTulipa species as a parameter for biosystematic research. — Biochem. Syst. Ecol.18: 399–404.
Raamsdonk, L. W. D. van, 1988: IRIS: a program package for Information Regrouping to Identify Structures, release 3.1. — CPO, Wageningen.
Stebbins, G. L., 1971: Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. — London: Edward Arnold.
Stuessy, T. F., 1990: Plant taxonomy. — New York: Columbia University Press.
Stork, A., 1984: Tulipes sauvages et cultivées. — Genève: Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques, Série documentaire 13.
Swofford, D., 1985: PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, version 2.4. — Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Vvedenskyi, A. I., 1935:Tulipa. — InKomarov, V. L., (Ed.): Flora of the U.S.S.R.,4, pp. 246–280. English edition. — Leningrad: Izd. An. U.S.S.R.
Wiley, E. O., 1978: The evolutionary species concept reconsidered. — Syst. Zool.27: 17–26.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Raamsdonk, L.W.D., de Vries, T. Biosystematic studies inTulipa sect.Eriostemones (Liliaceae). Pl Syst Evol 179, 27–41 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00938017
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00938017