Abstract
The data base for each process of the nuclear fuel cycle has been updated as a part of the Committee on Nuclear and Alternative Energy Systems (CONAES) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL). The BNL Energy System Network Simulator (ESNS) was modified to accommodate the new data, and methodology was developed for estimating population dose and health effects resulting from atmosphere releases of radioactive materials from the nuclear fuel cycle.
Estimates of population dose and health effects were made using these new CONAES emission data and the new model for three scenarios out to the year 2000: (1) no reprocessing; (2) reprocessing, 1-year cooling; and (3) reprocessing, 5-year cooling. Results indicate that radon emissions from mining and milling of uranium bearing ores will have greater impacts than any other component in the open nuclear fuel cycle. The estimated number of health effects will depend, to a large extent, on the lung model mechanism assumed to induce cancer; i.e., either the smeared or the unsmeared model. The smear model and the linear relationship predict for scenario 1, 630; for scenario 2, 949; and for scenario 3, 854 lung cancers, respectively, using the new CONAES data.
Epidemiologic data from six United States counties were correlated using a new statistical model (described in the text) in order to test the validity of the lung model and the linear relationship. Results do not support the high lung cancer correlations expected from the unsmear model and the linear relationship; therefore, it is concluded that low-dose mechanisms may be different from those developed from high-dose data. The best place to look for effects of low-dose radiation may be the less developed countries because of a reduction in the noise level caused by chemical pollutants.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Beller, M. 1975. Source Book for Energy Assessment. BNL 50483, Brookhaven National Laboratory 193 p.
Bozzo, S. R., F. Galdos, K. M. Novak, and L. D. Hamilton. 1978. Medical Data Base: A Tool for Studying the Relationship of Energy-Related Pollutants to 111 Health. BNL 50840, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 350 p.
Brookhaven National Laboratory. 1977. GONAES, Risk-Impact Panel Report, Upton, NY 84 p.
Cohen, B. L. 1976. Rebuttal: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Power due to Radon Emission. Bull. Atomic Scientist 32:61–63.
Comey, D. C. 1975. The Legacy of Uranium Tailings. Bull. Atomic Scientists 31:43–45.
Doll, R., and A. B. Hill. 1964. (Mortality in Relation to Smoking. Ten Years Observations of British Doctors) British Medical J. 1:1460–1467.
Duncan, O. D. 1966; Path Analysis: Sociological Examples. American J. Sociology 72:1–16.
Eichholz, G. G. 1977. Environmental Aspects of Nuclear Power. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan, 183 p.
El-Hinnawi, E. E. 1978. Review of the Environmental Impact of Nuclear Energy. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) Bull. 20(2):32–42.
Enterline, P. E. 1961. Causes of Death Responsible for Recent Increases in Sex Mortality Differentials in the United States. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 19:312–328.
Farankes, R. (Ed.). 1976. The First Pacific Basin Conference on Nuclear Power Development and the Fuel Cycle, Proceedings of the American Nuclear Society, Honolulu, Hawaii, Interstate Printers, Danville, Illinois USA 589 p.
Fitzgerald, J., R. J. Guimond, and R. A. Shaw. 1976. A Preliminary Evaluation of the Control of Indoor Radon Daughter Levels in New Structures. EPA-520/4-76-18, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Radiation Programs, Washington, D.C. 62 p.
Goldstein, M., R. N. Anderson, T. Gangwer, G. Selvaduray, C. Braun, D. Goellner, R. Malone, W. A. Sevian, and R. Lester. 1977. Waste Management and Proliferation: An Assessment of Technologies and Policies Relevant to Nuclear Power. BNL 50694, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 129 p.
Grimes, W. 1976. Natural Resource Use in an Effluent from Mining and Milling Operations for Various Nuclear Rectors. Second draft, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tn 45 p.
International Nuclear Fuel Cycle Evaluation. 1977. Final Communique of the Organizing Conference. Document 41, International Nuclear Fuel Cycle Evaluation (INFCE), Washington, D.C., 10 p.
Johnson, R. H. Jr., D. E. Bernhardt, N. S. Nelson, and H. W. Calley, Jr. 1973. Assessment of Potential Radiological Health Effects from Radon in Natural Gas. EPA-520/1-73-004, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Radiation Programs, Washington, D.C. 60 p.
Joint Committee on Atomic Energy. 1967. Radiation Exposure to Uranium Miners. (Hearings before the 90th Congress, part 2.) U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., pp. 1262–1277.
Kuchupillai, N., I. C. Verma, M. S. Grewal, and V. Ramalingaswami. 1976. Nature 262:60–61.
Lipfert, F. W., Tobacco Tax Council, Inc. 1970. Richmond, Virginia, Tax Burden on Tobacco Historial Compilation Report no. 5:79–86.
Martell, E. A. 1975. Tobacco Radioactivity and Concern in Smokers, American Scientist 63:404–412.
National Academy of Science-National Research Council. 1972. The Effects on Populations of Exposure to Low Level Ionizing Radiation. Report of the Advisory Committee on Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiations. (Commonly referred to as the BEIR Report) Washington, D.C., 217 p.
OECD/Nuclear Energy Agency. 1977. Objectives, Concepts and Strategies for the Management of Radioactive Waste Arising from Nuclear-Power Programmes. Paris Organization for Economic Cooperation, (ISBN 9-264-11696-6) Paris, 174 p.
Pohl, R. O. 1975. Nuclear Energy: Health Effect of Thorium-230. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., 21 p.
Ramsay, W., 1976, Radon from uranium mill tailings: A source of significant radiation hazard? Environmental Management 1(2):139–145.
Schwing, R. C., and G. C. McDonald. 1976. Measures of Association of some Air Pollutants, Natural Ionizing Radiation and Cigarette Smoking with Mortality Rates. The science of the total environment. 5:139–169.
Sevian, W. A. 1975. The Energy System Network Simulator: General Description and Sample Analysis. BNL 50492, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 71 p.
U.S. Department of Energy. 1978. Report of Task Force for Review of Nuclear Waste Management, Draft. DOE/ER-0004/D, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 166 p.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Radiation Programs. 1973. Environmental Analysis of the Uranium Fuel Cycle, Part I, Fuel Supply. EPA-S20/9-73-003-B, U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C., pp 72–74.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1974. Approaches to Population Protection in the Case of Nuclear Accidents. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., pp. 3-12–3-15.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 1976. Final Generic Environmental Statement on the Use of Recycle Plutonium in Mixed Oxide Fuel. NUREG-0002, Chapter IV, Section J, Appendix A. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 24 p.
United Nations. 1972. Ionizing Radiation, Levels and Effects. UNSCEAR Report, pp. 75–85. United Nation, New York, New York, USA.
United Nations Environmental Programme. 1976. Review of the Impact of Production and Use of Energy on the Environment. Report of the Executive Director, UNEP/GC/61/Add'l. 2, 107 p. United Nation. Nairobi, Kenya.
Verbugge, L. M. 1975. Sex Differences in Illness and Death in the United States. The John Hopkins University Center for Metropolitan Planning and Research, Baltimore, Maryland, 58 p.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goldstein, M.K., Bozzo, S.R., Malone, R. et al. Health effects from the nuclear fuel cycle and other sources in perspective. Environmental Management 3, 447–460 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01866583
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01866583