Skip to main content
Log in

Angiosperm origin and early stages of seed plant evolution deduced from rRNA sequence comparisons

  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Complete or partial nucleotide sequences of five different rRNA species, coded by nuclear (18S, 5.8S, and 5S) or chloroplast genomes (5S, 4.5S) from a number of seed plants were determined. Based on the sequence data, the phylogenetic dendrograms were built by two methods, maximum parsimony and compatibility. The topologies of the trees for different rRNA species are not fully congruent, but they share some common features. It may be concluded that both gymnosperms and angiosperms are monophyletic groups. The data obtained suggest that the divergence of all the main groups of extant gymnosperms occurred after the branching off of the angiosperm lineage. As the time of divergence of at least some of these gymnosperm taxa is traceable back to the early Carboniferous, it may be concluded that the genealogical splitting of gymnosperm and angiosperm lineages occurred before this event, at least 360 million years ago, i.e., much earlier than the first angiosperm fossils were dated. Ancestral forms of angiosperms ought to be searched for among Progymnospermopsida. Genealogical relationships among gymnosperm taxa cannot be deduced unambiguously on the basis of rRNA data. The only inference may be that the taxon Gnetopsida is an artificial one, andGnetum andEphedra belong to quite different lineages of gymnosperms. As to the phylogenetic position of the two Angiospermae classes, extant monocotyledons seem to be a paraphyletic group located near the root of the angiosperm branch; it emerged at the earliest stages of angiosperm evolution. We may conclude that either monocotyledonous characters arose independently more than once in different groups of ancient Magnoliales or that monocotyledonous forms rather than dicotyledonous Magnoliales were the earliest angiosperms. Judging by the rRNA trees, Magnoliales are the most ancient group among dicotyledons. The most ancient lineage among monocotyledons leads to modern Liliaceae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonov AS, Troitsky AV (1986) The results of investigation of evolution of plant rRNA evoke doubt in universal fitness of the “molecular clock” hypothesis. J Evol Biochem Physiol 22:343–350 [in Russian]

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Archie JW (1989) Phylogenies of plant families: a demonstration of phylogenetic randomness in DNA sequence data derived from proteins. Evolution 43:1796–1800.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod DI (1970) Mesozoic paleogeography and early angiosperm history. Bot Rev 36:277–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck CB (ed) (1976) Origin and early evolution of angiosperms. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck CB (ed) (1988) Origin and evolution of gymnosperms. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobrova VK, Troitsky AV, Ponomarev AG, Antonov AS (1987) Low-molecular-weight rRNAs sequences and plant phylogeny reconstruction: nucleotide sequences of chloroplast 4.5S rRNAs fromAcorus calamus (Araceae) andLigularia calthifolia (Asteraceae). Plant Syst Evol 156:13–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Britten RJ (1986) Rates of DNA sequence evolution differ between taxonomic groups. Science 231:39–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger WC (1981) Heresy revived: the monocot theory of angiosperm origin. Evol Theory 5:189–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Z-Q, Zhang H, Li G-Y (1986) The nucleotide sequences of chloroplast 4.5S rRNAs from four species of plants, celery (Apium graveoleus), barley (Hordeum vulgare), Chinese chive (Allium tuberosum), and dayflower (Commelina communis). FEBS Lett 200:193–196

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crane PR (1985) Phylogenetic analysis of seed plants and the origin of angiosperms. Ann Mo Bot Gard 72:716–793

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren R, Rasmussen FN (1983) Monocotyledon evolution. Characters and phylogenetic estimation. Evol Biol 16:255–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Dams E, Hendriks L, Van de Peer Y, Neefs J-M, Smits G, Vandenbempt I, De Wachter R (1988) Compilation of small ribosomal subunit RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 16S:r87-r173

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JA (1978) Origin of angiosperms. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 9:369–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JA, Donoghue MJ (1987) The importance of fossils in elucidating seed plant phylogeny and macroevolution. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 50:63–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdmann VA, Wolters J (1986) Collection of published 5S, 5.8S and 4.5S ribosomal RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 14S:r1-r59

    Google Scholar 

  • Estabrook GF (1983) The causes of character incompatibility. In: Felsenstein J (ed) Numerical taxonomy. NATO ASI Series, vol G1. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 279–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Estabrook GF, McMorris FR (1980) When is one estimate of evolutionary relationships a refinement of another? J Math Biol 10:367–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1989) PHYLIP—phylogeny inference package, Version 3.2

  • Fitch WM (1971) Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for specific tree topology. Syst Zool 20:406–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie JH (1986) Variability of evolutionary rates of DNA. Genetics 113:1077–1091

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman M (1981) Decoding the pattern of protein evolution. Progr Biophys Mol Biol 37:105–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh TA, Timmis JN (1988) Structure of melon rDNA and nucleotide sequence of the 17–25S spacer region. Theor Appl Genet 76:673–680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiss T, Kis M, Abel S, Solymosy F (1988) Nucleotide sequence of the 17S–25S spacer region from tomato rDNA. Nucleic Acids Res 16:7179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krassilov VA (1989) Origin and early evolution of flowering plants. Nauka, Moscow [in Russian]

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Quesne WJ (1983) The uniquely derived concept as a basis for character compatibility analyses. In: Felsenstein J (ed) Numerical taxonomy. NATO ASI Series, vol G1. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 296–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang HQ, Bernard M, Bachellerie J-P (1983) Improved method for structure probing in large RNAs: a rapid heterologous sequencing approach is coupled to the direct mapping of nuclease accessible sites. Application of eukaryotic 28S rRNA. Nucleic Acids Res 11:5903–5920

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin PG, Dowd JM (1986) A phylogenetic tree for some monocotyledons and gymnosperms derived from protein sequences. Taxon 35:469–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin PG, Boulter D, Penny D (1985) Angiosperm phylogeny studied using sequences of five macromolecules. Taxon 34:393–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin W, Gierl A, Saedler H (1989) Molecular evidence for pre-Cretaceous angiosperm origin. Nature 339:46–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melekhovets YuF, Troitsky AV (1990) Comparative analysis of 5.8S rRNA fromEphedra kokanica Regl. (Gymnospermae) and other plant species. Biochim Biophys Acta 1048:294–296

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melekhovets YuF, Troitsky AV, Valiejo-Roman KM, Bobrova VK, Antonov AS (1988) Nucleotide sequences of cytosolic 5S ribosomal RNAs from two gymnosperms,Gnetum gnemon andEphedra kokanica. Nucleic Acids Res 16:4155

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyen SV (1984) Basic features of gymnosperm systematics and phylogeny as evidenced by the fossil record. Bot Rev 50:1–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Nairn CJ, Ferl RJ (1988) The complete nucleotide sequence of the small-subunit ribosomal RNA coding region for the cycadZamia pumila: phylogenetic implications. J Mol Evol 27:133–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nazar RN, McDougall J, Van Ryk DI (1987) Structure and evolution of the 4.5–5S ribosomal RNA intergenic region fromGlycine max (soya bean). Nucleic Acids Res 15:7593–7603

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Omelyanchuk LV, Kolchanov NA (1985) Algorithm for additive tree building from sets of homologous sequences. Veracity of phylogenetic reconstructions In: Algorithmic analysis of structural information (Computer Systems), no 112. IM SO AN SSSR Novosibirsk, pp 46–55 [in Russian]

    Google Scholar 

  • Peattie DA (1979) Direct chemical method of sequencing RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:1760–1764

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rakhimova GM, Troitsky AV, Klikunova IN, Antonov AS (1989) Phylogenetic analysis of 18S rRNA partial sequences from 14 higher plant species. Mol Biol 23:830–842 [in Russian]

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schiebel K, Hemleben V (1989) Nucleotide sequence of the 18S–25S spacer region from rDNA of mung bean. Nucleic Acids Res 17:2852

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster W, Brennicke A (1987) Plastid DNA in the mitochondrial genome ofOenothera: intra- and interorganelle rearrangements involving part of the plastid ribosomal cistron. Mol Gen Genet 210:44–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan AL (1969) Flowering plants: origin and dispersal. Smithsonian, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Troitsky AV, Bobrova VK, Ponomarev AG, Antonov AS (1984) The nucleotide sequence of chloroplast 4.5S rRNA fromMnium rugicum (Bryophyta): mosses also possess this type of RNA. FEBS Lett 176:105–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troitsky AV, Bobrova VK, Melekhovets YuF, Valiejo-Roman KM (1989a) The nucleotide sequence of 5.8S rRNA from the mossMnium rugicum Laur. Nucleic Acids Res 17:459

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Troitsky AV, Valiejo-Roman KM, Melekhovets YuF, Bobrova VK, Omelyanchuk LV, Antonov AS (1989b) Higher plant phylogeny reconstruction based on chloroplast 4.5S and 5S rRNAs. Nucleotide sequences in 4.5S rRNAs from five plant species. J Evol Biochem Physiol 25:167–175 [in Russian]

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe KH, Gouy M, Yang Y-W, Sharp PM, Li W-H (1989) Date of the monocot-dicot divergence estimated from chloroplast DNA sequence data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:6201–6205

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolters J, Erdmann VA (1988) Compilation of 5S rRNA and 5S rRNA gene sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 16S:r1-r70

    Google Scholar 

  • Zharkikh AA, Rzhetsky AYu, Morosov PS, Sitnikova TL, Krushkal JS, Matushkin YuG (1990) VOSTORG: package of microcomputer programs of phylogenetic analysis. In: Modelling and computer methods in molecular biology and genetics. Abstracts of the International Conference, Novosibirsk, pp 217–218

  • Zhou X, Liu W, Wang M (1988) Comparative study on the evolution of chloroplast ribosomal 5S RNA of a living fossil plant,Cycas revoluta Thunb. FEBS Lett 235:30–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer EA, Hamby RK, Arnold ML, Leblanc DA, Theriot EC (1989) Ribosomal RNA phylogenies and flowering plant evolution. In: Fernholn B, Bremer K, Jörnvall H (eds) The hierarchy of life. Elsevier Science Publishers BV (Biomedical Division), Amsterdam, pp 205–214

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Troitsky, A.V., Melekhovets, Y.F., Rakhimova, G.M. et al. Angiosperm origin and early stages of seed plant evolution deduced from rRNA sequence comparisons. J Mol Evol 32, 253–261 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342748

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342748

Key words

Navigation