Skip to main content
Log in

A Comment on Kidd’s Characterisation of Knowledge Workers

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract:

Irrespective of the frequency to which it is referred, the concept of ‘knowledge work’ remains surprisingly ill defined and generally not well understood. In this paper we address one of the more insightful contributions by Kidd in 1994 and contrast her characterisation with our experience in a case study of a legal team. In general this shows strong correlation with her definitions of knowledge work but also raises interesting questions about some of her secondary characteristics. These lend support to the hypothesis that knowledge work is not a uniform area. Thus, it is inappropriate to generalise too much on attributes that are governed by the domain of expertise in search of a universal definition. However, there is sufficient common ground to believe that only a few major groups exist distinguished mainly by working practice, team and career structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elliman, A., Hayman, A. A Comment on Kidd’s Characterisation of Knowledge Workers. Cognition, Technology & Work 1, 162–168 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s101110050014

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s101110050014

Navigation