Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of helium-neon laser irradiation on in vitro maturation and fertilization of immature bovine oocytes

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study was made of the effects of low power laser irradiation on in vitro oocyte maturation rates and subsequent fertilization of immature bovine oocytes. Immature bovine oocytes from cows sacrificed at a slaughterhouse were irradiated with Helium-Neon laser (HeNe laser) irradiation at an energy density of 0.4 and 2.0 J cm−2. An oocyte group was left untreated, serving as control group. All oocytes were matured and fertilized in TCM-199 medium supplemented with 20% fetal calf serum (FCS). Maturation and fertilization rates obtained in the irradiated oocytes group were lower (p<0.001 andp<0.05, respectively) than those of the control group. Furthermore, the laser-treated oocytes showed important degenerative changes on both cytoplasm and chromosomes in comparison with untreated control oocytes which showed a homogenous cytoplasm and disperse chromosomes. It is concluded that the application of HeNe laser irradiation at 0.4 and 2.0 J cm−2 energy densities has a detrimental effect on in vitro maturation and fertilization process of immature bovine oocytes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Biggers JD. In: Biggers JO, Schuetz W (eds)Oogenesis, Baltimore, Maryland: Univ. Park Press, 1972:241–52

    Google Scholar 

  2. McGaughey RW. A comparison of the fluids from small and large ovarian follicle of the pig.Biol Reprod 1975,13(2):147–53

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wasserman P. The mammalian ovum. In: Knobil E, Neill J (eds)The Physiology of Reproduction, Vol 1. New York: Raven Press, 1988:69–102

    Google Scholar 

  4. Warnes GM, Moor RM, Johnson MH. Changes in protein synthesis during maturation of sheep oocytes in vivo and in vitro.J Reprod Fertil 1977,49(2):331–5

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caspers K. Laser stimulation therapy.Physics and Medical Rehabilitation 1977,18(9):426–45

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kana J, Hana D, Waidelich W. Effect of low power density radiation on healing of open skin wounds in rats.Arch Surg 1981,116:291–6

    Google Scholar 

  7. Korvacs L. The stimulatory effect of laser on the physiological healing of portio surface.Lasers Surg Med 1981,1:241–52

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ribari O. The stimulating effect of low power laser rays: Experimental examinations in otorhinolaryngology.Reviews in Laryngology 1981,102:531–3

    Google Scholar 

  9. Passarella S, Casamassima E, Molinari S et al. Increase of proton electrochemical potential and ATP synthesis in rat liver mitochondria irradiated in vitro by HeNe laser.FEBS Lett 1984,175:95–9

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yamada K. Biological effects of low power laser irradiation on clonal osteoblastic cells (MC3T3-E1).Nippon Seikeigeka Gakki Zasshi 1991,65:787–99

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tominaga R. Effects of HeNe laser irradiation on fibroblasts derived from scar tissue of rat palatal mucosa (Jpn).Kokubyo Gakki Zasshi 1990,57:580–5

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nara Y, Tsukamoto Y, Fukutani S et al. Stimulative effect of HeNe laser irradiation on cultured fibroblasts derived from human dental pulp.Lasers Life Sci 1992,4(4):249–52

    Google Scholar 

  13. Herbert KE, Bhusate LL, Scott DL et al. Effect of laser light at 820 nm on adenosine nucleotide levels in human lymphocytes.Lasers Life Sci 1989,3(1):37

    Google Scholar 

  14. Karu TI, Kalendo GS, Letokhov VS. Comparison of the action of powerful pulses of ultrashort UV on the DNA replication and transcription functions in proliferating and resting HeLa cells (Rus).Radiobiologiia 1984,24:17–20

    Google Scholar 

  15. Karu TI, Smolyaninova N, Selenin A. Long-term and short-term responses of human lymphocytes to HeNe laser radiation.Lasers Life Sci 1991,4(3):167

    Google Scholar 

  16. Devlin TM.Textbook of Biochemistry—with Clinical Correlations, 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986:123

    Google Scholar 

  17. Calderhead RG. On the correct reporting of parameters and consistent use of terminology in reporting clinical and experimental LLLT procedures.Laser Ther 1990,3:2

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ball GD, Leibfried ML, Lenz RW et al. Bovine fertilization in vitro: A temperature sensitive process.J Anim Sci 1982, 336

  19. Wheeland RG, Walker NPJ. Lasers 25 years later.Int J Dermatol 1986,25:209–16

    Google Scholar 

  20. Abergel P, Meeker A, Lam S et al. Control of connective tissue metabolism by lasers: Recent developments and future prospects.J Am Acad Dermatol 1984,11:1142–50

    Google Scholar 

  21. Trelles MA, Mayayo E. Bone fracture consolidates faster with low-power laser.Lasers Surg Med 1987,7:36–45

    Google Scholar 

  22. Goldman JA, Chiapella J, Casey H et al. Laser therapy of rheumatoid arthritis.Lasers Surg Med 1980,1:93–101

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ocaña Quero JM, Gomez Villamandos R, Moreno Millan M, Santisteban Valenzuela JM. The effect of the Helium-Neon laser radiation on the in vitro fertilization of bovine oocytes. Proceedings of the 11th European Coll. Cytogenet. Domest. Anim. 1994, 174–8

  24. Bielanski A, Hare WCD. Development in vitro of bovine embryos after exposure to continuous helium-neon laser light.Theriogenology 1992,37:192

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hirao Y, Yanagimachi R. Detrimental effect of visible light on meiosis of mammalian eggs in vitro.J Exp Zool 1978,206:365–70

    Google Scholar 

  26. Basford JR. Low-energy laser therapy: Controversies and new research findings.Lasers Surg Med 1989,9:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  27. Karu TI.Photobiology of Low-Power Laser Therapy. Chur: Harwood Academy Publishers, 1989:205

    Google Scholar 

  28. Karu TI. Effects of visible radiation on cultured cells.Photochem Photobiol 1990,52(6):1089

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tiphlova O, Karu TI. Role of primary photoacceptors in low-power laser effects: Action of HeNe laser radiation on bacteriophage T4-Escherichia coli interaction.Lasers Surg Med 1989,9:67

    Google Scholar 

  30. Karu TI, Tiphlova O. Stimulation ofE. coli growth by laser and incoherent red light.II Nuovo Cimento 1983,2D(4):1138

    Google Scholar 

  31. Karu TI, Tiphlova O. Effect of irradiation with monochromatic visible light on cAMP content in Chinese hamster fibroblast.II Nuovo Cimento 1987,9D(10):1245

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cheng LY, Packer L. Photodamage to hepatocytes by visible light.FEBS Lett 1979,97:124

    Google Scholar 

  33. Parshad R, Sanford KK, Taylor WG et al. Effect of intensity and wavelength of fluorescent light on chromosome damage in cultured mouse cells.Photochem Photobiol 1979,29:971

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tyrrell RM, Pidoux M. Action spectra for human skin cells: Estimates of the relative cytotoxicity of the middle ultraviolet, near ultraviolet, and violet regions of sunlight on epidermal keratinocytes.Cancer Res 1987,47:1825

    Google Scholar 

  35. Loevschall H.Survey of Preliminary Low Level Laser Reports (Danish), Roskilde: Roskilde University, 1989:45

    Google Scholar 

  36. O'Kane S, Shields DT, Gilmore WS, Allen JM. Low intensity laser irradiation inhibits tritiated thymidine incorporation in the hemopoietic cell lines HL-60 and U937.Lasers Surg Med 1994,14:34–9

    Google Scholar 

  37. Olson JE, Schimmerling W, Gundy GC, Tobias CA. Laser microirradiation of cerebellar neurons in culture. Electrophysiological and morphological effects.Cell Biophys 1981,3:349

    Google Scholar 

  38. McKelvey VJ, Keegan AL, Allen JM. Induction of DNA damage by low level laser irradiation in Friend mouse erythroleukemia cells.Mutat Res 1992,271:131

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pardee AB, Dubrow R, Hamlin JL, Kletzien RF. Animal cell cycle.Ann Rev Biochem 1978,47:715–50

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lucke-Huhle C. Alpha-irradiation induced G2 delay. A period of cell recovery.Radiat Res 1982,89:298–308

    Google Scholar 

  41. Passarella S, Roncali L, Cicero R, Quagliariello E. New ultrastructural conformations of mitochondria irradiated in vitro with a helium-neon laser.Lasers Life Sci 1988,2(3):161–71

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lehninger AL. Mitochondria and calcium ion transport.Biochem J 1970 118:129–38

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bradley MP, Forrester IT. A sodium calcium exchange mechanism in plasma membrane vesicles isolated from ram flagella.FEBS Lett 1980,121:15–18

    Google Scholar 

  44. Babcock DF, Pfeiffer DR. Independent elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ and Ph of mammalian sperm by voltage dependent and pH sensitive mechanism.J Biol Chem 1987,262:15041–7

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sallet C, Passarella S, Quagliariello E. Effects of selective irradiation on mammalian mitochondria.Photochem Photobiol 1987,45:433–8

    Google Scholar 

  46. Darnell J, Lodish H, Baltimore D.Molecular Cell Biology, 2nd edn. New York: Scientific American Books, Inc., 1990:345

    Google Scholar 

  47. Alberts B, Bray D, Lewis J et al.Molecular Biology of the Cell, 2nd edn. New York & London: Garland Publishing Inc., 1989:67

    Google Scholar 

  48. Shepherd GM.Neurobiology, New York: Oxford University Press, 1983:123

    Google Scholar 

  49. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC.Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989:89

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quero, J.M.O., Villamandos, R.J.G., Millan, M.M. et al. The effect of helium-neon laser irradiation on in vitro maturation and fertilization of immature bovine oocytes. Laser Med Sci 10, 113–119 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02150848

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02150848

Key words

Navigation