Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Research in Computational Design at Stanford

  • Published:
Research in Engineering Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brown, D., Cutkosky, M.R. and Tenenbaum, J.M., “Next-Cut: A Second Generation Computational System for Concurrent Engineering,”Proceedings, 1989 Symposium on Concurrent Engineering, M.I.T., (in press).

  2. Cutkosky, M.R. and Tenenbaum, J.M., “A Methodology and Computational Framework for Concurrent Product and Process Design,”Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 25:3, April 1990

  3. Cutkosky, M.R. and Tenenbaum, J.M., “CAD/CAM Integration Through Concurrent Product and Process Design,”Proceedings of the ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Symposium on Intelligent and Integrated Manufacturing PED-Vol. 25, pp. 1–10, Boston, MA (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Darwiche, A., Levitt, R.E. and Hayes-Roth, B., “OARPLAN: Generating Project Plans by Reasoning about Objects, Actions and Resources,”Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing Vol. 2, No. 3, 1988, pp 169–181.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hayes-Roth, B., “A Blackboard Architecture for Control,”Artificial Intelligence, Vol. No. 26, pp. 251–321, 1985.

  6. Lakin, F., et al, “The Electronic Notebook: Performing Medium and Processing Medium,”The Visual Computer Vol. 5, pp. 214–226, Springer-Verlag, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Levitt, R.E., Tommelein, I.D., Hayes-Roth, B. and Confrey, T. “SightPlan' A Blackboard Expert System for Constraint-Based Spatial Reasoning about Construction Site Layout,”Technical Report #20, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford, CA, October, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Singh, N., “Helios User's Manual,”Technical Report, Schlumberger Palo-Alto Research, 1985.

  9. Smith, R.G. and Carando, P., “Structured-Object Programming in Strobe,”Technical Report, Schlumberger-Doll Research, 1986.

  10. Wilson, R.H. and Rit, J., “Maintaining Geometric Dependencies in an Assembly Planner”Proceedings, 1990 IEEE Conf. on Robotics and Automation, May, 1990.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA

    J. M. Tenenbaum

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, 523 Terman Hall, 94305-4070, Stanford, CA, USA

    M. R. Cutkosky

Authors
  1. M. R. Cutkosky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. M. Tenenbaum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

With contributions from J-C. Latombe, T.O. Binford, M. Genesereth, B. Hayes-Roth, T. Gruber, L. Leifer, and R.E. Levitt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cutkosky, M.R., Tenenbaum, J.M. Research in Computational Design at Stanford. Research in Engineering Design 2, 53–59 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02029821

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02029821

Keywords

Search

Navigation