Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comments on Isard and Tung

  • Published:
Papers of the Regional Science Association

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. See equations (1), (2) and (3), section 2, in W. Isard and T. H. Tung, “Some Concepts for the Analysis of Spatial Organization,”Papers, Regional Science Association, vol. XI, 1963.

  2. It should be pointed out that the strong decentralization attributed to pattern “Z” in Table 1 (almost 100 percent decentralization) need not necessarily be considered as greater decentralization than that associated with patterns “V” and “W” (where the decision-making authority is distributed rather uniformly among nodes at all levels, and not only at nodes of the 4th level.

Download references

Authors
  1. Felix Rosenfeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The author is associated with the Institute of Statistics, University of Paris, and the Société d'Économie et de Mathématique Appliquées, Paris, France.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenfeld, F. Comments on Isard and Tung. Papers of the Regional Science Association 12, 27–28 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01941237

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01941237

Search

Navigation