Summary
Head size and shape of reptiles may reflect selection for multiple uses. For example, sexual selection for large head size may enhance feeding efficiency. In contrast, morphological characteristics of the heads of fossorial reptiles suggests that fossoriality may have evolved at the expense of reduced effectiveness in feeding. Our research focused on the question: Does a fossorial lizard feed less effectively than a non-fossorial lizard? To answer this question, we measured the time, number of bites, and oxygen consumption by sand-swimming (Chalcides ocellatus) and epigeal (Eumeces inexpectatus) skinks feeding on crickets. These lizard species were similar in mass, but different in body form: Chalcides had longer bodies and smaller heads than Eumeces. For lizards of the same mass, Chalcides were unable to eat prey as large as those eaten by Eumeces, Chalcides took longer to eat prey of the same size than did Eumeces, and the aerobic energy cost of eating crickets of the same relative size (cricket mass/lizard mass) tended to be greater for Chalcides than for Eumeces. The ecologically relevant costs of feeding appear to be the upper limit to the size of prey and the time of feeding. Both costs would restrict the energy intake per unit time of Chalcides. Moreover, given the same energy requirements and prey community, Chalcides would have to feed more often and would take longer to feed than would Eumeces. Both factors would increase the exposure of Chalcides to predators relative to that of Eumeces. To reduce the risk of predation, Chalcides would have to reduce energy intake or fulfill its energy requirements with relatively small prey, or both. These conclusions are potentially confounded in two ways. The first is that male Eumeces have relatively large heads as a result of sexual selection. Thus, the differences we observed between Chalcides and Eumeces (most of our specimens were males) could have been the result of reduced costs of feeding for Eumeces due to sexual selection and not the result of enhanced costs of feeding for Chalcides. A more likely explanation is that differences in the costs of feeding observed between these species reflect adaptations for fossoriality by Chalcides and sexual selection on Eumeces. Our results may also be confounded because we compared laboratory reared Chalcides with field captured Eumeces. Any deterimental effects of captivity on the vigor of Chalcides would increase their costs of feeding relative to those of Eumeces. Although short-term captivity is not associated with changes in the metabolic capcity of lizards, effects of long-term captivitiy are unknown.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews RM (1979) Evolution of life histories: a comparison of Anolis from matched island and mainland habitats. Breviora 454:1–51
Andrews RM, Pough FH (1985) Metabolism of squamate reptiles: allometric and ecological relationships. Physiol Zool 58:214–231
Bogert CM, Cowles RB (1947) Moisture loss in relation to habitat selection in some floridian reptiles. Am Mus Novit 1358:1–34
Campbell HW, Christman SP (1982) The herpetological components of Florida sandhill and sand pine scrub association. In: Herpetological communities, Scott NJ (ed), United States Department of the Interior, Fish Wildl Serv Wildl Res Rep No. 13, pp 163–171
Carothers JH (1984) Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in some herbivorous lizards. Amer Natur 124:244–254
Fisk RM Jr (1980) Comparative functional morphology of trunk and tail in a series of sand swimming lizards of the family Scincidae. Dissertation, Univ. of Chicago
Gans C (1968) Relative success of divergent pathways in amphisbaenian specialization. Am Nat 102:345–362
Gans C (1974) Biomechanics: an approach to vertebrate biology. JP Lippincott, Philadelphia
Gans C (1975) Tetrapod limblessness: evolution and functional corollaries. Amer Zool 15:455–467
Gleeson TT (1979) The effects of training and captivity on the metabolic capacity of the lizard Sceloporus occidentalis. J Comp Physiol 129:123–128
Greer AE (1970) A subfamilial classification of scincid lizards. Bulletin Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University 139:151–184
Hamilton WH Jr, Pollack JA (1961) The food of some lizards from Fort Benning, Georgia. Herpetologica 17:99–106
Huey RB, Pianka ER (1981) Ecological consequences of foraging mode. Ecology 62:991–999
Huey RB, Pianka ER, Egan ME, Coons LW (1974) Ecological shifts in sympatry; Kalahari fossorial lizards (Typhlosaurus). Ecology 55:304–316
Kamel S, Gatten RE Jr (1983) Aerobic and anaerobic activity metabolism of limbless and fossorial reptiles. Physiol Zool 56:419–429
Mosauer W (1932) Adaptive convergence in the sand reptiles of the Sahara and California: a study in structure and behavior. Copeia 1932:72–78
Mosauer W (1934) The reptiles and amphibians of Tunisia. Pubs Univ Calif Los Angeles Biol Sci 1:49–64
Pasteur G (1981) A survey of the species groups of the Old World scincid genus Chalcides. J Herpetol 15:1–16
Pianka ER (1969a) Sympatry of desert lizards (Ctenotus) in western Australia. Ecology 50:1012–1030
Pianka ER (1969b) Habitat specificity, speciation, and species density in Australian desert lizards. Ecology 50:498–502
Pough FH (1980) The advantages of ectothermy for tetrapods. American Naturalist 115:92–112
Pough FH, Andrews RM (1984) Individual and sibling-group variation in metabolism of lizard: the aerobic capacity model for the evolution of endothermy. Comp Biochem Physiol 79A:415–419
Pough FH, Andrews RM (1985) Energy costs of subduing and swallowing prey for a lizard. Ecology 66:1525–1533
Rieppel O (1984) The cranial morphology of the fossorial lizard genus Dibamus with a consideration of its phylogenetic relationships. J Zool Lond 204:289–327
Rundquist EM, Collins JT (1974) Distribution and life history notes on the southeastern five-lined skink, Eumeces inexpectatus Taylor, in Kentucky. Trans Kentucky Acad Sci 35:79–80
SAS (1982) SAS User's Guide: Statistics, 1982 edition, SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC
Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 2:369–404
Sherry TW, McDade LA (1982) Prey selection and handling in two neotropical hover-gleaning birds. Ecology 63:1016–1028
Smith CR (1982) Food resource partitioning of fossorial Florida reptiles. In: Herpetological communities, Scott NJ (ed), United States Department of the Interior, Fish Wildl Serv Wildl Res Rep No. 13, pp 173–178
Smith KK (1984) The use of the tongue and hyoid apparatus during feeding in lizards (Ctenosaura similis and Tupinambis nigropunctatus). J Zool Lond 202:115–143
Vitt LJ, Cooper WE, Jr. (1985) The evolution of sexual dimorphism in the skink Eumeces latiseps: an example of sexual selection. Can J Zool 63:995–1002
Vitt LJ, Cooper WE, JR. (1986) Skink reproduction and sexual dimorphism: Eumeces fasciatus in the southeastern United States, with notes on Eumeces inexpectatus. J Herpetol 20:65–76
Vleck D (1978) Energetics of activity and growth. Ph D dissertation, U California, Los Angeles
Withers PC (1981) Physiological correlates of limblessness and fossoriality in scincid lizards. Copeia 1981:197–203
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andrews, R.M., Pough, F.H., Collazo, A. et al. The ecological cost of morphological specialization: feeding by a fossorial lizard. Oecologia 73, 139–145 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376990
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376990