Summary
The subtidal coralline flats of northeastern New Zealand support a characteristic guild of grazing herbivores. The most important members of this guild are an echinometrid echinoid, patellid, turbinid and trochid gastropods. Densities of these herbivores fluctuate through time. Interactions within and among the different species of echinoids and gastropods were investigated experimentally. Different combinations of species were caged at densities up to 5 times that of ambient for a 24 week period in an experiment designed to differentiate between intra- and interspecific competition.
The echinoidEvechinus chloroticus and the turbinid gastropodCookia sulcata exhibited reduced mean dry weight with increasing intraspecific densities. There was little evidence of density-related mortality in these species. The limpetCellana stellifera showed comparatively large losses of weight and enhanced mortalities in intraspecific experimental treatments but this was not related to density.
Investigation of interspecific interactions amongstEvechinus andCookia revealed no evidence of a negative influence of one species on the other. In terms of dry weight,Cookia was indifferent to the presence ofEvechinus, andEvechinus benefited in the reciprocal interaction.Cookia also enjoyed an enhanced mean dry weight when in the presence ofCellana compared to the equivalent intraspecific treatments. There were no coherent trends in proportional mortality in any treatments with enhanced interspecific densities.
Cellana, in the presence ofCookia, exhibited a dramatic decrease in mortality rate and increase in mean dry weight. The presence of the turbinid gastropod was clearly beneficial to the limpet when compared to the intraspecific treatments with enhanced intraspecific densities and the control cages containingCellana at ambient density. We suggest that subtidal areas constitute poor habitats for limpets in the absence of agents such asCookia which may provide or maintain suitable sites for attachment and grazing.
For the combinations of densities and species investigated there was a consistent trend towards positive interspecific interactions. It seems unlikely that at the sites investigated interspecific competition could act to restrict distributions, or limit abundances of species.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrew NL, Choat JH (1982) The influence of predation and conspecific adults on the abundance of juvenileEvechinus chloroticus (Echinoidea: Echinometridae). Oecologia 54:80–87
Andrew NL, Choat JH (1985) Habitat related differences in the survivorship and growth of juvenile sea urchins. Mar Ecol Prog Ser (in press)
Ayling AM (1981) The role of biological disturbance in temperate subtidal encrusting communities. Ecology 62:830–847
Branch GM (1975) Intraspecific competition inPatella cochlear Barn. J Anim Ecol 44:263–282
Choat JH, Schiel DR (1982) Patterns of distribution and abundance of large brown algae and invertebrate herbivores in subtidal regions of northern New Zealand. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 60:129–162
Creese RG, Underwood AJ (1982) Analysis of inter- and intra-specific competition amongst intertidal limpets with different methods of feeding. Oecologia 53:337–346
Dethier MN, Duggins DO (1984) An “indirect commensalism” between marine herbivores and the importance of competitive hierarchies. Am Nat 124:205–219
Fletcher WJ (1984) Variability in the reproductive effort of the limpet,Cellana tramoserica. Oecologia 61:259–264
Fletcher WJ, Creese RG (1985) Competitive interactions between co-occuring herbivorous gastropods. Mar Biol (in press)
Foreman RE (1977) Benthic community modification and recovery following intensive grazing byStrongylocentrotus droebachiensis. Helgol Wiss Meers 30:468–484
Keller BD (1983) Coexistence of sea urchins in seagrass meadows: an experimental analysis of competition and predation. Ecology 64:1581–1598
Mann KH (1977) Destruction of kelp beds by sea urchins: a cyclical phenomenon or irreversible degradation. Helgol Wiss Meers 30:455–467
Meagher TR, Burdick DS (1980) The use of nearest neighbour frequency analyses in studies on association. Ecology 61:1253–1255
Ortega S (1985) Competitive interactions amongst tropical intertidal limpets. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 90:11–25
Pielou EC (1961) Segregation and symmetry in two-species populations as studied by nearest-neighbour relationships. J Ecol 49:255–269
Shiel DR (1982) Selective feeding by the echinoidEvechinus chloroticus and the removal of plants from subtidal algal stands in northern New Zealand. Oecologia (Berlin) 54:379–388
Underwood AJ (1976) Food competition between age classes in the intertidal NeritaceanNerita atramentosa Reeve (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 23:145–154
Underwood AJ (1978) An experimental evaluation of competition between three species of intertidal Prosobranch gastropods. Oecologia 33:185–202
Underwood AJ (1979) The biology of gastropods. Adv Mar Biol 16:111–210
Underwood AJ (1984) Vertical and seasonal patterns in competition for microalgae between intertidal gastropods. Oecologia 64:211–222
Underwood AJ (1985) The analysis of competition by field experiments. In: Anderson DJ, Kikkawa J (eds) Community ecology: Patterns and processes. Blackwell Sci Publ (in press)
Wiens JA (1977) On competition and variable environments. Am Sci 65:590–597
winer BJ (1971) Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha Tokyo 2nd Edition, p 907
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choat, J.H., Andrew, N.L. Interactions amongst species in a guild of subtidal benthic herbivores. Oecologia 68, 387–394 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01036744
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01036744