Skip to main content
Log in

Distributional success of the marine seaweedFucus vesiculosus L. in the brackish Baltic Sea correlates with osmotic capabilities of Baltic gametes

  • Ecophysiology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To understand the unique success of the marine seaweedFucus vesiculosus L. (PHaeophyceae) in the brackish Baltic Sea, the performance of gametes from Baltic [4.1–6.5‰S (Salinity)] and marine populations was studied. Sperm from BalticF. vesiculosus swam with a path velocity of c. 30–110 μm/s and could fertilize eggs in waters of salinities from 4 to 33‰S. In their natural water, Baltic sperm were not negatively phototactic, unlike marine sperm in seawater; this should decrease the sperm:egg concentration at the seafloor and reduce the likelihood of polyspermy. Marine (Iceland, Sweden) sperm in seawater had a path velocity of c. 80–100 μm/s, but performed poorly and could not fertilize eggs in natural or artificial Baltic water ≤6‰S; therefore, Baltic populations have adapted or acclimated to their brackish habitat. Baltic populations appear better adapted to their natural low salinities because, even after culturing Baltic and marine individuals in water from both the Baltic (6.5‰S) and the marine Skagerrak (21‰S), Baltic sperm were in both cases still able to swim and fertilize eggs at lower salinities (4‰S) than marine sperm; fertilization never occurred between marine gametes at 4–6‰S. However,F. vesiculosus acclimates to some salinities, since sperm from Baltic and marine males that had been cultured at 21‰S swam better (higher velocity, proportion that were motile and/or linearity) in marine salinities (21–33‰S) than when they were cultured at 6.5‰S. The effects of salinity on sperm motility and fertilization were osmolar rather than due to specific ionic requirements, over the tested range. The osmolalities (< c. 100 mmol/kg) at which fertilization success of Baltic gametes decreases nearly to zero correspond to the osmolality of Baltic water at the northernmost limit of distribution ofF. vesiculosus in the Baltic Sea. Therefore, the present range ofF. vesiculosus in the Baltic appears to correspond to the osmotic tolerance of the gametes. Very small natural or anthropogenic increases in ambient osmolality would be likely to cause a substantial expansion of this species into the inner Baltic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson L, Håkansson B, Lundqvist JE, Omstedt A, Rahm LA, Sjöberg B, Svensson J (1992) Water in the west and water in the east. In: Sjöberg B (ed) Sea and coast. National Atlas of Sweden, Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm, pp 56–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson S, Kautsky L, Kalvas A (1994) Circadian and lunar gamete release inFucus vesiculosus in the atidal Baltic Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 110: 195–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1992) IVOS operations manual. Hamilton Thorn Research, Beverly

  • Bäck S, Collins JC, Russell G (1992) Effects of salinity on growth of Baltic and AtlanticFucus vesiculosus. Br Phycol J 27: 39–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Brawley SH (1987) A sodium-dependent, fast block to polyspermy occurs in eggs of fucoid algae. Dev Biol 124: 390–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Brawley SH (1991) The fast block against polyspermy in fucoid algae is an electrical block. Dev Biol 144: 94–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Brawley SH (1992) Fertilization in natural populations of the dioecious brown algaFucus ceranoides L. and the importance of the polyspermy block. Mar Biol 113: 145–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Brawley SH, Bell E (1987) Partial activation ofEucus eggs with calcium ionophores and low sodium seawater. Dev Biol 122: 217–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows EM (1964) Ecological experiments with species ofFucus. In: Davy de Virville A, Feldmann J (eds) Proc. IV Int. Seaweed Symp. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 166–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Biological Diversity in Marine Systems (1995) Understanding marine biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinnel PA, Link JM, Stober QJ (1987) Improved methodology for a sea urchin sperm cell bioassay for marine waters. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 16: 23–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans LV, Callow JA, Callow ME (1982) The biology and biochemistry of reproduction and early development inFucus. Progr Phycol Res 1: 67–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey RD, Bastiani MJ, Webb DJ, Schertel ER (1982): An electrical block is required to prevent polyspermy in eggs fertilized by natural mating ofXenopus laevis. Dev Biol 89: 475–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintz JL, Lawrence JM (1994) Acclimation of gametes to reduced salinity prior to spawning inLuidia clathrata (Echinodermata: Asteroidea). Mar Biol 20: 443–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatius H, Axberg S, Niemistö L, Winterhalter B (1981) Quaternary geology of the Baltic Sea. In: Voipio A (ed) The Baltic Sea. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 54–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe LA, Gould M (1985) Polyspermy-preventing mechanisms. In: Metz CB, Monroy A (eds) Biology of fertilization, vol 3. Academic Press, New York, pp 223–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Kautsky H, Kautsky L, Kautsky N, Kautsky U, Lindblad C (1992) Studies on theFucus vesiculosus community in the Baltic Sea. Acta Phytogeogr Suec 78: 33–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Kniep H (1907) Beiträge zur Keimungs-Physiologie und-Biologie vonFucus. Jahrb Wissensch Bot 44: 635–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi W, Yoshichika B, Shimozawa T, Yamamoto TS (1994) The fertilization potential provides a fast block to polyspermy in lamprey eggs. Dev Biol 161: 552–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier I, Muller DG (1986) Sexual pheromones in algae. Biol Bull 170: 145–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Manton I, Clarke B (1956) Observations with the electron microscope on the internal structure of the spermatozoid ofFucus. J Exp Bot 7: 416–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Morisawa M (1994) Cell signaling mechanisms for sperm motility. Zool Sci 11: 647–662

    Google Scholar 

  • Morisawa M, Suzuki K (1980) Osmolality and potassium ion: their roles in initiation of sperm motility in teleosts. Science 210: 1145–1147

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller DG, Gassmann G (1978) Identification of the sex attractant in the marine brown algaFucus vesiculosus. Naturwissenschaften 65S: 389

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Toole C, Brownson C (1992) Activators and inhibitors of the motility ofFucus serratus. Biochem Soc Trans 20: 252

    Google Scholar 

  • Quatrano RS (1980) Gamete release, fertilization, and embryogenesis in the Fucales. In: Gantt E (ed) Handbook of phycological methods. Developmental and cytological methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 59–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Remane A, Schlieper C (1971) Biology of brackish water. Wiley, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley JP, Skirrow G (1975) Chemical oceanography, vol 2, 2nd edn, Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rietema H (1991) Evidence for ecotypic divergence betweenPhycodrys rubens populations from the Baltic and North Sea. Bot Mar 34: 375–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell G (1985) Recent evolutionary changes in the algae of the Baltic Sea. Br Phycol J 20: 87–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell G (1988) The seaweed flora of a young semi-enclosed sea: the Baltic. Salinity as a possible agent of flora divergence. Helgoländer Meeresunters 42: 243–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Schueller GH, Peters AF (1994) Arrival ofFucus evanescens (Phaeophyceae) in Kiel Bight (Western Baltic). Bot Mar 37: 471–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrão EA, Kautsky L, Brawley SH (1993) Sperm motility and natural fertilization success inFucus vesiculosus in the Baltic Sea. Mol Biol Cell Suppl 4: 139

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrão EA, Pearson G, Kautsky L, Brawley SH (in press) Successful external fertilization in turbulent environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

  • Solemdal P (1967) The effect of salinity on buoyancy, size and development of flounder eggs. Sarsia 29: 431–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford CJ, Green JR, Callow JA (1992) Organisation of glycoproteins into plasma membrane domains onFucus serratus eggs. J Cell Sci 101: 437–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Westin L, Nissling A (1991) Effects of salinity on spermatozoa motility, percentage of fertilized eggs and egg development of Baltic cod (Gadus morhua), and implications for cod stock fluctuations in the Baltic. Mar Biol 108: 5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Wærn M (1952) Rocky-shore algae in the Öregrund archipelago. Acta Phytogeogr Suec 30: 1–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright PJ, Reed RH (1990) Effects of osmotic stress on gamete size, rhizoid initiation and germling growth in fucoid algae. Br Phycol J 25: 149–155

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ester A. Serrão.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Serrão, E.A., Kautsky, L. & Brawley, S.H. Distributional success of the marine seaweedFucus vesiculosus L. in the brackish Baltic Sea correlates with osmotic capabilities of Baltic gametes. Oecologia 107, 1–12 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00582229

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00582229

Key words

Navigation