Skip to main content
Log in

Social organization and space use in California voles: seasonal, sexual, and age-specific strategies

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We intensively monitored space use and movement in Microtus californicus over a 2-year period that included 1 year of high density (maximum 618/ha) and one of low (minimum 5/ha); historically this population has exhibited cycles of 2 or 4 years. Adults of both sexes dispersed at the start of the breeding season, culminating in the establishment of intrasexually exclusive territories. In females, these territories persisted throughout life, except that many young females recruiting during the breeding season established contiguous, overlapping, or adjacent home ranges with their mothers. This female philopatry explains the conclusion of previous workers that females of this species are non-territorial. In the dry (non-breeding) season, females had smaller ranges that often overlapped and were clustered. Adult males moved breeding territories at a modal interval of 6 weeks; this is consistent with their avoidance of inbreeding with philopatric daughters. Ranges overlapped 1–4 adult females at any one time, and a cohort of 7 long-lived males overlapped an average of 16.4 females during their tenure on the grid. The period of maximum overlap with adult females varied among individual males, and did not correlate with the time of maximum body weight. Ranges of males in the dry season overlapped extensively, with persistent associations among some individuals. In the lowdensity year, ranges of some adults failed to overlap intersexually. Juvenile males dispersed gradually between 3 and 13 weeks of age (half before 9 weeks), with some leaving after reaching sexual maturity; a few remained philopatric. Of juvenile females, 47% remained philopatric with the rest disappearing before 9 weeks of age. New understanding of vole social behavior, dispersal, and space use is achieved by focusing on the seasonal dynamics of spatial relationships among individuals with respect to age, sex, and relatedness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson PK (1989) Dispersal in rodents: a resident fitness hypothesis. Am Soc Mammal, Spec Publ no 9

  • Batzli GO, Pitelka FA (1970) Influence of meadow mouse populations on California grassland. Ecology 50:1027–1039

    Google Scholar 

  • Batzli GO, Pitelka FA (1971) Condition and diet of cycling populations of the California vole, Microtus californicus. J Mammal 52:141–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondrup-Nielsen S, Karlsson F (1985) Movements and spatial patterns in populations of Clethrionomys species: a review. Ann Zool Fenn 22:385–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra R, Krebs CH (1979) Viability of large- and small-sized adults in fluctuating vole populations. Ecology 60:567–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra R, Krebs CH, Gaines MS, Johnson ML, Craine ITM (1987) Natal philopatry and breeding systems in voles (Microtus spp.) J Anim Ecol 56:655–673

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter CS, Getz LL, Cohen-Parsons M (1986) Relationships between social organization and behavioral endocrinology in a monogamous mammal. Adv Stud Behav 16:109–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1989) Female transfer and inbreeding avoidance in social mammals. Nature 337:70–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn A (1988) Social behaviour in fluctuating populations. Croom Helm, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn A, Lidicker WZ Jr (1983) Microhabitat heterogeneity and population ecology of an herbivorous rodent, Microtus californicus. Oecologia 59:167–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford RG, Krumme DW (1979) The analysis of space use patterns J Theor Biol 76:125–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford RG, Pitelka FA (1984) Resource limitation in populations of the California vole. Ecology 65:122–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Heady HF, Foin TC, Hektner MM, Taylor DW, Barbour MG, Barry WJ (1977) Coastal prairie and northern coastal scrub. In: Barbour MG, Major J (eds) Terrestrial vegetation of California. Wiley, New York, pp 733–760

    Google Scholar 

  • Heske EJ (1987a) Responses of a population of California voles, Microtus californicus, to odor-baited traps. J Mammal 68:64–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Heske EJ (1987b) Spatial structuring and dispersal in a high density population of the California vole Microtus californicus. Holarctic Ecol 10:137–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Heske EJ, Ostfeld RS, Lidicker WZ jr (1988) Does social behavior drive vole cycles? An evaluation of competing models as they pertain to California voles. Can J Zool 66:1153–1159

    Google Scholar 

  • Hestbeck JB (1986) Multiple regulation states in populations of the California vole, Microtus californicus. Ecol Monogr. 56:161–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Jannett FJ Jr (1978) The density-dependent formation of extended maternal families of the montane vole, Microtus montanus nanus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3:245–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson ML, Gaines MS (1987) The selective basis for dispersal of the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster. Ecology 68:684–694

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1966) Demographic changes in fluctuating populations of Microtus californicus. Ecol Monog 36:239–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin X, Krebs CJ (1991) Can changes in female relatedness influence microtine population dynamics? Oikos 61:126–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin X, Krebs CJ (1993) Influence of female relatedness on the demography of Townsend's vole populations in spring. J Anim Ecol 62:536–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker WZ Jr (1973) Regulation of numbers in an island population of the California vole, a problem in community dynamics. Ecol Monogr 43:271–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker WZ Jr (1980) The social biology of the California vole. The Biologist 62:46–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker WZ Jr (1988) Solving the enigma of microtine “cycles”. J Mammal 69:225–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker WZ Jr (1994) A spatially explicit approach to vole population processes. Pol Ecol Stud 20:211–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker WZ Jr, MacLean SF Jr (1969) A method for estimating age in the California vole, Microtus californicus. Am Midl Nat 82:450–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker WZ Jr, Ostfeld RS (1991) Extra-large body size in California voles: causes and fitness consequences. Oikos 61:108–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker WZ Jr, Stenseth NC (1992) To disperse or not to disperse: who does it and why? In: Stenseth NC, Lidicker WZ Jr (eds) Animal dispersal: small mammals as a model. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 21–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Munz PA, Keck DD (1959) A California flora. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostfeld RS (1985a) Limiting resources and territoriality in microtine rodents. Am Nat 126:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostfeld RS (1985b) Experimental analysis of aggression and spacing behavior in California voles. Can J Zool 63:2277–2282

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostfeld RS (1986) Territoriality and mating system of California voles. J Anim Ecol 55:691–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostfeld RS (1992) Do changes in female relatedness determine demographic patterns in microtine rodents? Oikos 65:531–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostfeld RS, Klosterman LL (1986) Demographic substructure in a California vole population inhabiting a patchy environment. J Mammal 67:693–704

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostfeld RS, Lidicker WZ Jr, Heske EJ (1985) The relationship between habitat heterogeneity, space use, and demography in a population of California voles. Oikos 45:433–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs LA (1979) Experimental studies of dispersal in the California vole, Microtus californicus. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvioni M (1988) Home range and social behavior of three species of European Pitymys (Mammalia, Rodentia). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:203–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenseth NC (ed) (1985) Clethrionomys biology: population dynamics, dispersal, reproduction and social structure. Ann Zool Fenn 22:205–395

  • Tamarin RH, Ostfeld RS, Pugh RS, Bujalska G (eds) (1990) Social systems and population cycles in voles. Birkhauser, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff JO (1985) Behavior. In:Tamarin RH (ed) Biology of New World Microtus. Am Soc Mammal, Spec Publ no 8, pp 340–372

  • Wolff JO (1989) Social behavior. In: Kirkland GL, Lavne JN (eds) Advances in the study of Peromyscus (Rodentia). Texas Technical Press, Lubbock, pp 271–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff JO, Lidicker WZ Jr (1980) Population ecology of the taiga vole, Microtus xanthognathus, in interior Alaska. Can J Zool 58:1800–1812

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff JO, Lidicker WZ Jr, Chesser RK, Smith MH (1991) Review of: Anderson PK, Dispersal in rodents: a resident fitness hypothesis. Am Soc Mammal, Spec Publ no 9. J Mammal 72:218–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakrzewski RJ (1985) The fossil record. In: Tamarin RH (ed) Biology of New World Microtus. Am Soc Mammal Spec Publ no 8, pp 1–51

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salvioni, M., Lidicker, W.Z. Social organization and space use in California voles: seasonal, sexual, and age-specific strategies. Oecologia 101, 426–438 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00329421

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00329421

Key words

Navigation