Skip to main content
Log in

How does inactivation change timing of replication in the human X chromosome?

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Human Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The kinetics of replication of the inactive (late replicating) X chromosome (LRX) were studied in karyotypically normal lymphocytes and human amniotic fluid cells. Both cell types were successively pulse labeled with 1-h or 1/2-h thymidine pulses in an otherwise BrdU-substituted S phase after partial synchronization of the cultures at G1/S. For the first time with this technique, the entire sequence of replication was analyzed for the LRX from the beginning to the end of the S phase, with special reference to mid S (R-band to G-band transition replication). The inactive X is the last chromosome of the metaphase to start replication, with a delay of 1 or 2h, after which time a thymidine pulse results in R-type patterns. In mid S, the inactive X is the first chromosome to switch to G-type replication (without overlapping of both types and without any detectable replication pause). Until the end of S, a thymidine pulse results in G-type patterns. To rule out artifacts that might arise by the synchronization of cultures in these experiments, controls were carried out with BrdU pulses and the BrdU antibody technique without synchronization. In the course of replication, no fundamental difference was seen between the two different cell types examined. In contrast to studies using continuos labeling, this study did not reveal an interindividual difference of replication kinetics in the LRXs of the seven individuals studied; thus it is concluded that the inactive X chromosome shows only one characteristic course of replication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Calza RE, Eckhardt L, DelGiudice T, Schildkraut CL (1984) Changes in gene position are accompanied by a change in time of replication. Cell 36:689–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Daumiller E, Heilbronner H (1984) Untersuchung zur Wirkungsweise von unterschiedlichen Methotrexatkonzentrationen in Vollblutkulturen (abstract). 9. Tagung der Sektion Cytogenetik der Gesellschaft für Anthropologie und Humangenetik, Mainz 1984

  • Gilbert CW, Muldal S, Lajtha LG, Rowley J (1962) Time sequence of human chromosome duplication. Nature 195:869–873

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmquist GP (1987) Role of replication time in the control of tissuespecific gene expression. Am J Hum Genet 40:151–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaluzewski B (1982) BrdU-Hoechst-Giemsa analysis of DNA replication in synchronized lymphocyte cultures. Study of human X and Y chromosomes. Chromosoma 85:553–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Latt SA, Barell EF, Dougherty CP, Lazarus H (1981) Patterns of late replication in X-chromosomes of human lymphoid cells. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 3:171–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima-de-Faria A, Reitaln J, Bergmann S (1961) The pattern of DNA synthesis in the chromosomes of man. Hereditas 47:695–704

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller U, Schempp W (1982) Homologous early replication patterns of the distal short arms of prometaphasic X and Y chromosomes. Hum Genet 60:274–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest JH, Heady JE, Priest RE (1967) Delayed onset of replication of human X chromosome. J Cell Biol 35:483–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy KS, Savage JRK, Papworth DG (1988) Replication kinetics of X chromosomes in fibroblasts and lymphocytes. Hum Genet 79:44–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage JRK, Prasad R (1984) Cytological subdivision of S-phase of human cells in asynchronous culture. J Med Genet 21:204–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Schempp W (1980) Asynchrony in late replication between homologous autosomes in primary cultures of Chinese hamster fibroblasts. Chromosoma 79:199–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Schempp W, Meer B (1983) Cytologic evidence for three human X-chromosomal segments escaping inactivation. Hum Genet 63: 171–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Schempp W, Vogel W (1978) Decrease of DNA synthesis in amniotic fluid cells during the middle part of S-phase revealed by differential chromosome staining after incorporation of BrdU. Chromosoma 67:193–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt M (1980) Two phases of DNA replication in human cells. Chromosoma 75:101–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt M, Stolzmann WU (1984) Replications variants of the human inactive X chromosome. II. Frequency and replication rate relative to the other chromosomes of the complement. Chromosoma 89:68–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt M, Stolzmann WU, Baranovskaya CJ (1982) Replication variants of the human inactive X chromosome. I. Variability within lymphocytes of single individuals. Chromosoma 85:405–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Speit G, Haupter S (1985) On the mechanism of differential Giemsa staining of bromodeoxyuridine—substituted chromosomes. II. Differences between the demonstration of sister chromatid differentation and replication patterns. Hum Genet 70:126–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Takagi N, Sandberg AA (1968) Chronology and pattern of human chromosome replication. VIII. Behaviour of the X and Y in early S-phase. Cytogenetics 7:135–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JH (1960) Asynchronous duplication of chromosomes in cultured cells of Chinese hamster. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 7:455–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel W, Schempp W, Sigwarth I (1978) Comparison of thymidine fluorodeoxyuridine, hydroxyurea, and methotrexate blocking at the G1/S phase transition of the cell cycle, studied by replication patterns. Hum Genet 45:193–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel W, Autenrieth M, Speit G (1986) Detection of bromodeoxyuridine incorporation in mammalian chromosomes by a bromodeoxyuridine-antibody. Hum Genet 72:129–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Willard HF (1977) Tissue-specific heterogeneity in DNA replication patterns of human X chromosomes. Chromosoma 61:61–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Willard HF, Latt SA (1976) Analysis of deoxyribomeleic acid replication in human X chromosomes by fluorescence microscopy. Am J Hum Genet 28:213–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf U (1974) Culture and preparation of cells from amniotic fluid. In: Schwarzbacher HG, Wolf U (eds) Methods in human cytogenetics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 59–70

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwemmle, S., Mehnert, K. & Vogel, W. How does inactivation change timing of replication in the human X chromosome?. Hum Genet 83, 26–32 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00274142

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00274142

Keywords

Navigation