Skip to main content
Log in

Forty four probands with an additional “marker” chromosome

  • Published:
Human Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Information is presented which has been obtained from an exhaustive examination of 44 probands with a supernumerary marker chromosome (mar) and their families. The data include the derivation of the mar, frequency in various populations, inheritance and possible effect on fertility, congenital abnormality, and mental ability. The practical problems in assessing the risk of abnormality in a foetus discovered during prenatal diagnosis to be carrying a mar, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitken J, Brunton M, Jacobs PA, Price WH, MacColl K (1971) Chromosome studies on male patients at a mental subnormality hospital. Clin Genet 2:338–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Angell RR, Aitken RJ, van Look PFA, Lumsden MA, Templeton AA (1983) Chromosome abnormalities in human embryos after in vitro fertilization. Nature 303:336–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayraud N, Noel B, Lloyd M, Letourneau J, Martinon J (1976) A small supernumerary metacentric chromosome: interpretation test. J Genet Hum 24:81–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein R, Hakim C, Hardwick B, Nurse GT (1978) Significance of detection of extra metacentric microchromosomes in amniotic cell culture. J Med Genet 15:136–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom SE, Goodpasture C (1976) An improved technique for selective silver staining of nucleolar organiser regions in human chromosomes. Hum Genet 34:199–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckton KE, O'Riordan ML, Ratcliffe S, Slight J, Mitchell M, McBeath S, Keay AJ, Barr D, Short M (1980) A G-band study of chromosomes in liveborn infants. Ann Hum Genet 43:227–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckton KE, Whalley LJ, Lee M, Christie JE (1983) Chromosome changes in Alzheimer's presenile dementia. J Med Genet 20:46–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhler EM, Mehes K, Muller H, Stalder GR (1972) Cat-eye syndrome a partial trisomy 22. Humangenetik 15:150–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell WA, Price WH (1979) Congenital hypothyroidism in Klinefelter's syndrome. J Med Genet 16:439–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandley AC, Edmond P, Christie S, Gowans L, Fletcher J, Frackiewicz A, Newton M (1975) Cytogenetics and infertility in man. I. Karyotype and seminal analysis. Ann Hum Genet 39:231–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MM, Sandberg AA, Takagi N, MacGillivray MH (1967) Autoradiographic investigations of centric fragments and rings in patients with stigmata of gonadal dysgenesis. Cytogenetics 6:254–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans HJ, Buckton KE, Sumner AT (1971) Cytological mapping of human chromosomes: results obtained with quinacrine fluorescence and the acetic-saline-Giemsa technique. Chromosoma 35: 310–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans HJ, Buckton KE, Spowart G, Carothers AD (1979) Heteromorphic X chromosomes in 46,XX males: evidence for the involvement of X-Y interchange. Hum Genet 49:11–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryns JP, Kleczkowska A, Van den Berghe H (1982) Small accessory chromosomes (SAC) and their genotype-phenotype correlation. J Genet Hum 30:215–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita H, Sakamoto Y, Hamamoto Y (1980) An extra idic(15p)(q11) chromosome in Prader-Willi syndrome. Hum Genet 55:409–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore DH, Boyd E, McClure JP, Batstone P, Connor JM (1984) Inv dup(15) with mental retardation but few dysmorphic features. J Med Genet 21:221–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Guanti G (1981) The aetiology of the cat eye syndrome reconsidered. J Med Genet 18:108–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassold T, Chen N, Funkhouser J, Jooss T, Manuel B, Matsuura J, Matsuyama A, Wilson C, Yamane JA, Jacobs PA (1980) A cytogenetic study of 1000 spontaneous abortions. Ann Hum Genet 44:151–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford DA (1965) Leucocytes cultured from small inocula of whole blood and the preparation of metaphase chromosomes by treatment with hypotonic KC1. Stain Technol 40:333–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs PA, Price WH, Richmond S, Ratcliff RAW (1971) Chromosome surveys in penal institutions and approved schools. J Med Genet 8:49–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs PA, Melville M, Ratcliffe S, Keay AJ, Syme J (1974) A cytogenetic survey of 11,680 newborn infants. Ann Hum Genet 37: 359–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RN (1975) B-chromosome systems in flowering plants and animal species. Int Rev Cytol 40:1–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight LA, Lipson M, Mann J, Bachman R (1984) Mosaic inversion duplication of chromosome 15 without phenotypic effect: occurrence in a father and daughter. Am J Med Genet 17:649–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Maraschio P, Zuffardi O, Bernardi F, Bozzola M, De Paoli C, Fonatsch C, Flatz SD, Ghersini L, Gimelli G, Loi M, Lorini R, Peretti D, Poloni L, Tonetti D, Vanni R, Zamboni G (1981) Preferential maternal derivation in inv dup(15). Analysis of eight new cases. Hum Genet 57:345–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Neri G, Malvezzi DC, Serra A, Bova R, Pelino A, Maugiatti L (1980) Properties and significance of a small marker chromosome in amniotic fluid cells. Clin Genet 18:253–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton MS, Cunningham C, Jacobs PA, Price WH, Fraser IA (1972) Chromosome survey of a hospital for the mentally subnormal. Part 2: Autosome abnormalities. Clin Genet 3:226–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen KB, Dyggve H, Friedrich U, Hobolth N, Lyngbye T, Mikkelsen M (1978) Small metacentric non-satellited extra chromosome. Hum Genet 44:59–69

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Riordan ML, Langlands AO, Harnden DG (1972) Further studies on the frequency of constitutional chromosome abnormalities in patients with malignant disease. Eur J Cancer 8:373–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Palutke W, Chen H, Woolley P, Espiritu C, Lauren Vogel H, Gohle N, Tyrkus M (1976) An extra small metacentric chromosome identified as a deleted chromosome No. 17. Clin Genet 9:454–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris Conference 1971 (1972) Standardization in human cytogenetics. Birth Defects VIII: The National Foundation, New York

  • Price WH, Brunton M, Buckton KE, Jacobs PA (1976) Chromosome survey of new patients admitted to the four maximum security hospitals in the United Kingdom. Clin Genet 9:389–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieto F, Badia L, Ribes C, Medina VH (1981) Trisomie 21 par translocation 21/21 chez deux fils d'une mere avec un microchromosome surnumeraire. Ann Genet 24:117–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Romain DR, Columbano-Green L, Smythe RH, Dukes PC (1979) Discovery of an inherited bisatellited metacentric microchromosome in amniotic cell culture. Clin Genet 16:183–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld W, Verma RS, Jhaveri RC (1984) Cat-eye syndrome with unusual marker chromosome probably not chromosome 22. Am J Med Genet 18:19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Schinzel A, Schmid W, Fraccaro M, Tiepolo L, Zuffardi O, Opitz JM, Lindsten J, Zetterqvist P, Enell H, Baccichetti C, Tenconi R, Pagon RA (1981) The “cat eye syndrome”: dicentric small marker chromosome probably derived from a no. 22 (tetrasomy 22pter→q11) associated with a characteristic phenotype. Hum Genet 57:148–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreck RR. Breg WR, Erlanger BF, Miller OJ (1977) Preferential derivation of abnormal human G-group like chromosomes from chromosome 15. Hum Genet 36:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer D, Ambros P, Andrle M (1978) Modification of DAPI banding on human chromosomes by prestaining with a DNA-binding oligopeptide antibiotic, distamycin A. Exp Cell Res 111:327–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Soudek D, Sroka H (1977) C-bands in seven cases of accessory small chromosomes. Clin Genet 12:285–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Soudek D, McCreary BD, Laraya P, Dill FJ (1973) Two kinships with accessory bisatellited chromosomes. Ann Genet 16:101–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbach P, Djalali M, Hansmann I, Kattner E, Meisel-Stosiek M, Probeck H-D, Schmidt A, Wolf M (1983) The genetic significance of accessory bisatellited marker chromosomes. Hum Genet 65: 155–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Stetten G, Sroka-Zaczek B, Corson VL (1981) Prenatal detection of an accessory chromosome identified as an inversion duplication (15). Hum Genet 57:357–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner AT (1972) A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp Cell Res 75:304–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner AT, Evans HJ, Buckland RA (1971) New technique for distinguishing between human chromosomes. Nature 232:31–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor KM, Wolfinger HL, Brown MG, Chadwick DL (1975) origin of a small metacentric chromosome: familial and cytogenetic evidence. Clin Genet 8:364–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyke DL, Weiss L, Logan M, Pai GS (1977) The origin and behavior of two isodicentric bisatellited chromosomes. Am J Hum Genet 29:294–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisniewski LP, Hassold T, Heffelfinger J, Higgins JV (1979) Cytogenetic and clinical studies in five cases of inv dup(15). Hum Genet 50:259–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisniewski LP, Witt ME, Ginsberg-Fellner F, Wilner J, Desnick RJ (1980) Prader-Willi syndrome and a bisatellited derivative of chromosome 15. Clin Genet 18:42–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip M-Y, Mark J, Hulten M (1982) Supernumerary chromosomes in six patients. Clin Genet 21:397–406

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buckton, K.E., Spowart, G., Newton, M.S. et al. Forty four probands with an additional “marker” chromosome. Hum Genet 69, 353–370 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00291656

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00291656

Keywords

Navigation