Skip to main content
Log in

Change in the differentiation pattern ofXenopus laevis ectoderm by variation of the incubation time and concentration of vegetalizing factor

  • Published:
Wilhelm Roux's archives of developmental biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Early amphibian gastrula ectoderm (Xenopus laevis) has been treated with vegetalizing factor using the sandwich technique, varying the period of incubation and the inducer concentration.

The pattern of induced tissues depends on three factors: the inducer concentration, the size of inducer pellet and the time of exposure of ectodermal target cells to inducer.

Short treatment with inducer will result in the formation of blood cells and heart structures. An increase in incubation time or inducer concentration, or both, will cause the formation of increasing amounts of such dorsal mesodermal structures as pronephros, somites and notochord. Neural structures can only be observed in explants with considerable amounts of somites and notochord.

Ectoderm treated with high concentrations of vegetalizing factor for the whole period of competence will differentiate into endoderm.

Furthermore, the results show thatX. laevis ectoderm does not show any autoneuralizing tendency under our experimental conditions. It therefore seems to be a suitable tool for the study of primary embryonic induction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asahi K, Born J, Tiedemann H, Tiedemann H (1979) Formation of mesodermal pattern by secondary inducing interactions. Wilhelm Roux' Arch 187:231–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Asashima M (1975) Inducing effects of the presumptive endoderm of successive stages in Triturus alpestris. Wilhelm Roux' Arch 177:301–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Born J, Geithe HP, Tiedemann H, Kocher-Becker U (1972) Isolation of a vegetalizing factor. Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem 353:1075–1084

    Google Scholar 

  • Born J, Grunz H, Tiedemann H Tiedemann H (1980) Biological activity of the vegetalizing factor Decrease after coupling to polysaccharide matrix and enzymatic recovery of active factor. Wilhelm Roux' Arch 189:47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Boterenbrood EC, Nieuwkopp PD (1973) The formation of the mesoderm in uredelean amphibians. V. Its regional induction by the endoderm. Wilhelm Roux' Arch 173:319–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Geithe HP, Asashima M, Born J, Tiedemann, H, Tiedemann H (1975) Isolation of a homogeneous morphogenetic factor, in ducing mesoderm and endoderm derived tissues in Triturus ectoderm. Exp Cell Res 94:447–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunz H (1970) Abhängigkeit der Kompetenz des Amphibien-Ektoderms von der Proteinsynthese. Wilhelm Roux' Arch 165:91–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunz H (1972) Einfluß von Inhibitoren der RNS- und Protein-Synthese und Induktoren auf die Zellaffinität von Amphibiengewebe. Wilhelm Roux' Arch 169:41–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunz H (1979) Change of the differentiation pattern of amphibian ectoderm after the increase of the initial cell mass Wilhelm Roux' Arch 187:49–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtfreter J (1933) Nachweis der Induktionsfähigkeit abgetöteter Keimteile. Isolations- und Transplatationsversuche. Wilhelm Roux' Arch 128:584–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Kocher-Becker U, Tiedemann H (1971) Induction of mesodermal and endodermal structures and primordial germ cells in Triturus ectoderm by a vegetalizing factor from chick embryos. Nature 233:65–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Leikola A (1963) The mesodermal and neural competence of isolated gastrula ectoderm studied by heterogeneous inductors. Ann Zool Soc Vanamo 25:2–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Leikola A (1965) On the loss of mesodermal competence of of Triturus gastrula ectoderm in vivo. Experientia, 21:458–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopashov GV (1935) Die Entwicklungsleistungen des Gastrulaektoderms in Abhängigkeit von Veränderungen der Masse. Biol Zentralbl 55:606–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuth M, Grunz H (1980) The formation of mesodermal derivatives after induction with vegetalizing factor depends on secondary cell interactions. Cell Differ 9:229–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwkoop PD (1969) The formation of the mesoderm in urodelean amphibians. II. The origin of the dorso-ventral polarity of the mesoderm. Wilhelm Roux' Arch 163:298–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwkoop PD, Faber J (1956) Normal table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin). North Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada, TS (1960) Epithelio-mesenchymal relationships in the regional differentiation of the digestive tract in the amphibian embryo. Wilhelm Roux' Arch 152:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiedemann H, Born J (1978) Biological activity of vegetalizing and neuralizing factors after binding to BAC-Cellulose and CNBr-Sepharose. Wilhelm Roux' Arch 184:285–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada T (1940) Beeinflussung der Differenzierungsleistung des isolierten Mesoderms von Molchkeimen durch zugefügtes Chorda- und Neuralmaterial. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 19:131–197

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to Professor Dr. Dr. H. Tiedemann on the occasion of his 60 th birthday

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grunz, H. Change in the differentiation pattern ofXenopus laevis ectoderm by variation of the incubation time and concentration of vegetalizing factor. Wilhelm Roux' Archiv 192, 130–137 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00848681

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00848681

Key words

Navigation