Skip to main content
Log in

Comparisons of in vivo BrdU labeling methods and spontaneous sister chromatid exchange frequencies in regenerating murine liver and bone marrow cells

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BrdU and BrdC have been employed as DNA labeling agents for differentiation of sister chromatids and for extension of sister chromatid exchange (SCE) methods to regenerating murine liver cells in vivo. Comparisons were made between bone marrow and liver cells isolated simultaneously from mice following DNA labeling with either BrdC or BrdU. Although the total mitotic yield of bone marrow cells was considerably greater than in liver, a higher percentage of second division metaphases was observed in liver cell preparations. The percentages of second division c-metaphase cells observed were 31.5% in bone marrow and 73% in liver cell preparations. Utilizing either BrdU or BrdC, no significant difference in percentage of second division metaphases was discerned. The number of spontaneous SCEs per cell was distributed according to the Poisson probability function. No significant differences in mean numbers of SCEs per cell were found in comparisons of bone marrow (1.40) and liver cells (1.65) or of cells which had incorporated BrdU or BrdC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, J.W., Latt, S.A.: Analysis of sister chromatid exchange formation in vivo in mouse spermatogonia as a new test system for environmental mutagens. Nature (Lond.) 260, 449–451 (1976a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J.W., Latt, S.A.: In vivo BrdU-33258 Hoechst analysis of DNA replication kinetics and sister chromatid exchange formation in mouse somatic and meiotic cells. Chromosoma (Berl.) 58, 325–340 (1976b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J.W., Schuler, C.F., Mendes, R.W., Latt, S.A.: A simplified technique for in vivo analysis of sister chromatid exchanges using 5-Bromodeoxyuridine tablets. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 18, 231–237 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, P.: Statistical methods in medical research, pp. 84–89. New York: John Wiley and Son 1971

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, M.A., Griggs, H.G., Bedford, J.S.: Recombinational DNA repair and sister chromatid exchange. Mutation Res. 24, 117–123 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R., Danjanov, I., Abanobi, S.E., Sarma, D.S.R.: A method for measuring DNA damage and repair in the liver in vivo. Cancer. Res. 33, 2114–2121 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, J.W., Prusoff, W.H., Welch, A.D., Sartorelli, A.C., Delamore, I.W., von Essen, C.F., Chang, P.K.: Studies in the biochemical pharmacology of 5-Iodo-2′-deoxycytidine in vitro and in vivo. Biochem. Pharmacol. 11, 761–768 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, N.J., Rabinowitz, M.: Synthesis of new strands of mitochondrial and nuclear deoxyribonucleic acid by semiconservative replication. J. biol. Chem. 244, 1563–1566 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, H.: Mechanisms for sister chromatid exchanges and their relation to the production of chromosomal aberrations. Chromosoma (Berl.) 59, 179–191 (1977a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, H.: Spontaneous and induced sister chromatid exchanges as revealed by the BudR labeling method. Int. Rev. Cytol. 33, 55–97 (1977b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriss, J.P., Révész, L.: The distribution and fate of Bromodeoxyuridine and Bromodeoxycytidine in mouse and rat. Cancer. Res. 22, 254–265 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Latt, S.A.: Sister chromatid exchanges, indices of human chromosome damage and repair: detection by fluorescence and induction by mitomycin C. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 71, 3162–3166 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.A.: Carcinogenesis by chemicals: An overview. Cancer. Res. 30, 559–576 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ono, T., Okada, S.: Estimation in vivo of DNA strand breaks and their rejoining in thymus and liver in mouse. Int. J. Rad. Biol. 25, 291–301 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pera, F., Mattias, P.: Labelling of DNA and differential sister chromatid staining after BrdU treatment in vivo. Chromosoma (Berl.) 57, 13–18 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilgrim, H. Ira, DeOme, K.B.: Intraperitoneal Phenobarbital anesthesia in mice. Exp. Med. Surg. 13, 401–403 (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  • Prusoff, W.H., Cramer, J.W., Chu, M.Y., Welch, A.D.: 5-bromo-2′-deoxycytidine (BCdR). I. Studies on metabolism in vitro and in mice. Biochem. Pharm. 8, 324–326 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabes, H.M., Tuczek, H.V., Wirsching, R.: Kinetics of Hepatocellular proliferation after partial hepatectomy as a function of structural and biochemical heterogeneity of the rat liver. In: Liver regeneration after experimental injury, Lesch, R. and Ruetter, W., eds.). pp. 35–55. New York: Stratton Intercontinental Medical Book Corp. 1975

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarma, D.S.R., Rajalakski: Studies on the interaction of neocarzinostatin with rat liver in vivo and in vitro. Biochem. Pharm. 25, 789–792 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartiano, G.P., Lynch, W., Boggs, S.S., Neil, G.L.: The demonstration of separate DNA polymerase activities in intact isolated rat liver nuclei by means of response to bleomycin and arabinosyl cytosine 5-triphosphate (39113). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 150, 718–722 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartiano, G.P., Winkelstein, W., Lynch, W., Boggs, S.S.: Effects of bleomycin on PHA-stimulated lymphocytes and isolated hepatic nuclei. J. Antibiotics (Tokyo), Ser. A, 26, 437–443, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, E.L., Chaillet, J.R., Tice, R.R.: In vivo BUdR labelling of mammalian chromosomes. Exp. Cell Res. 100, 396–399 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangler, M., Sartiano, G.P., Coetzee, M., Ove, P.: Effect of bleomycin on (H3) thymidine-5′-triphosphate incorporation into host liver and hepatoma nuclei. Cancer Res. 36, 1339–1346 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, W., Bauknecht, T.: Differential chromatid staining by in vivo treatment as a mutagenicity test system. Nature (Lond.) 260, 448–449 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, S.: Sister chromatid exchange. Ann. Rev. Genet. 11, 183–202 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, S., Bodycote, J.: The induction of chromatid deletions in accord with the break- and-reunion hypothesis. Mutation Res. 29, 85–91 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, J.D., Jr., Hopkins, H.A., Campbell, H.A., Potter, V.R.: An autoradiographic analysis of DNA synthesis following partial hepatectomy in rats. In: Liver regeneration after experimental injury (R. Lesch and W. Ruetter, eds.), pp. 56–60. New York: Stratton Intercontinental Medical Book Corp. 1975

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubroff, J., Sarma, D.S.R.: A radioactive method for measuring DNA damage and its repair in nonproliferating tissues. Anal. Biochem. 70, 387–396 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conner, M.K., Boggs, S.S. & Turner, J.H. Comparisons of in vivo BrdU labeling methods and spontaneous sister chromatid exchange frequencies in regenerating murine liver and bone marrow cells. Chromosoma 68, 303–311 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00327165

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00327165

Keywords

Navigation