Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of the climatology of a tropospherestratosphere-mesosphere model with observations

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mean fields from a perpetual January simulation of a GCM extending from the surface to 0.01 hPa (near 80 km) are compared to observations. The zonal mean temperature and wind fields correspond quite well with reality; the low stratosphere, especially in the polar night, is too cold, but warmer than in the original version of the model, with an upper boundary at 25 hPa. Mean fields at standard levels show that the major features of the troposphere are represented by the model, but rather over emphasised; the stratospheric winter polar vortex is too strong, too cold, and too barotropic; it resembles an `undisturbed' January rather than the climatology. Differences in the stationary eddy activity between the extended and orginal versions of the model are noted, and used to explain some differences between the two simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews DG, McIntyre ME (1976) Planetary waves in horizontal and vertical shear: the generalised Eliassen-Palm relation and the mean zonal acceleration. J Atmos Sci 33:2031–2048

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews DG, McIntyre ME (1978) Generalised Eliassen-Palm and Charney-Drazin theorems for waves on axisymmetric mean flows in compressible atmospheres. J Fluid Mech 89:647–664

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews DG, Mahlman JD, Sinclair RW (1983) Eliassen Palm diagnostics of Wave-mean flow interaction in the GDFL SKYHI General Circulation model. J Atmos Sci 40:2768–2784

    Google Scholar 

  • Arpe K, Klinker E (1986) Systematic errors of the ECMWF forecasting model in mid-latitudes. Quart J R Meteorol Soc 112:181–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett JJ, Corney M (1985) Middle atmosphere reference model derived from satellite data. In: Labitzke K, Barnett JJ, Edwards B (eds) MAP handbook 16, pp 47–85

  • Boville BA, Cheng X (1988) Upper boundary effects in a general circulation model. J Atmos Sci 45:2591–2606

    Google Scholar 

  • Charney JG, Drazin PG (1961) Propagation of planetary scale disturbances from the lower into the upper atmosphere. J Geophys Res 66:83–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Cariolle D, Lasserre-Bigorray A, Royer J-F, Geleyn J-F (1990) A general circulation model simulation of the springtime antarctic ozone minimum and its impact on mid-latitudes. J Geophys Res 95:1883–1898

    Google Scholar 

  • Farman JC, Gardiner BG, Shanklin JD (1985) Large losses of total ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal CLOx/NOx interaction. Nature 315:207–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Fels SB (1985) Radiative-dynamical interactions in the middle atmosphere. Adv Geophys 28A:277–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Fels SB, Schwarzkopf MD (1981) An efficient, accurate algorithm for calculating C02 15 μm heating rates. J Geophys Res 86:1205–1232

    Google Scholar 

  • Fels SB, Mahlman JD, Schwarzkopf MD, Sinclair RW (1980) Stratospheric sensitivity to perturbations in ozone and carbon dioxide: radiative and dynamical response. J Atmos Sci 37:2265–2297

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer G (ed) (1987) Climate simulations with the ECMWF model in Hamburg. Large scale atmospheric modelling report No 1. Meteorol Inst Universität Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer G (ed) (1989) Climate simulations with the ECMWF model in Hamburg. Part III: Diagnosis of response experiments. Large scale atmospheric modelling report No 7. Meteorol Inst Universität Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming E, Chandra S, Schoeberl M, Barnett JJ (1988) Monthly mean global climatology of temperature, wind, geopotential height, and pressure for 0–120 km. NASA TM-100697

  • Geleyn J, Hollingsworth A (1979) An economical analytical method for the computation of the interaction between scattering and line absorption of radiation. Beitr Phys Atmosph 52:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Gille JC, Lyjak LV (1986) Radiative heating and cooling rates in the middle atmosphere. J Atmos Sci 43:2215–2229

    Google Scholar 

  • Haigh JD, Pyle JA (1982) Ozone perturbations in a two dimensional circulation model. Quart J R Meteorol Soc 108:551–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood RS, Pyle JA (1975) A two dimensional mean circulation model for the atmosphere below 80 km. Quart J R Meteorol Soc 101:723–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi Y, Golder DG, Mahlman JD, Miyahara S (1989) The effect of horizontal resolution on gravity waves simulated by the GFDL SKYHI general circulation model. PAGEOPH 130:421–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckley WA (1985) Systematic errors of the ECMWF operational forecasting model in tropical regions. Quart J R Meteorol Soc 111:709–738

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton JR, Wehrbein WM (1980) A numerical model of the zonal mean circulation of the middle atmosphere. PAGEOPH 118:284–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating GM, Young DF (1986) Interim reference ozone models for the middle atmosphere. In: Labitzke K, Barnett JJ, Edwards B (eds) MAP Handbook 16, 205–229

  • Kiehl JT, Boville BA (1988) The radiative-dynamical response of a stratospheric-tropospheric general circulation model to changes in ozone. J Atmos Sci 45:1798–1817

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo HL (1974) Further studies of the parameterisation of the influence of cumulus convection on the large scale flow. J Atmos Sci 31:1232–1240

    Google Scholar 

  • Labitzke K (1972) Climatology of the stratosphere in the northern hemisphere, Part 1. Meteorologische Abhandlungen, Inst Meteorol Free University Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindzen RS, Batten ES, Kim JW (1968) Oscillations in atmospheres with tops. J Atmos Sci 28:133–140

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane NA (1987) The effect of orographically excited gravity wave drag on the general circulation of the lower stratosphere and troposphere. J Atmos Sci 44:1775–1800

    Google Scholar 

  • McPeters RD, Heath DF, Bhartia PK (1984) Average ozone profiles for 1979 from the NIMBUS 7 SBUV instrument. J Geophys Res 89:5199–5214

    Google Scholar 

  • Morcrette JJ (1990) Impact of changes to the radiation transfer parameterizations plus cloud optical properties in the ECMWF model. Mon Weather Rev 118:847–873

    Google Scholar 

  • Oort AH (1983) Global atmospheric circulation statistics, 1958–1973. NOAA Prof pap No 14

  • Palmer TN, Shutts GJ, Swinbank R (1986) Alleviation of a systematic westerly bias in general circulation and numerical weather prediction models through an orographic gravity wave drag parameterisation. Quart J R Meteorol Soc 112:1001–1039

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan V, Pitcher EJ, Malone RC, Blackmon ML (1983) The response of a spectral general circulation model to refinements in radiative processes. J Atmos Sci 40:605–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Randell WJ (1987) Global atmospheric circulation statistics, 10001 mb. NCAR technical note, TN-295+STR

  • Rasch PJ (1986) Towards atmospheres without tops: Absorbing upper boundary conditions for numerical models. Quart J R Meteorol Soc 112:1195–1218

    Google Scholar 

  • Rind D, Suozzo R, Balachandran NK, Lacis A, Russell G (1988a) The GISS Global Climate-Middle atmosphere model. Part 1: Model structure and climatology. J Atmos Sci 45:329–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Rind D, Suozzo R, Balachandran NK (1988b) The GISS Global Climate-Middle atmosphere model. Part 2: Model variability due to interactions between planetary waves, the mean circulations, and gravity wave drag. J Atmos Sci 45:371–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland FS, Molina MJ (1975) Chlorofluoromethanes in the environment. Rev Geophys Space Phys 13:1–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzkopf MD, Fels SB (1985) Improvements to the algorithm for computing CO transmissivities and cooling rates. J Geophys Res 90:10541–10550

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea D (1986) Climatological Atlas, 1950–1979. NCAR Technical note TN269 + STR

  • Simmons AJ, Strafing R (1983) Numerical forecasts of stratospheric warming events using a model with a hybrid vertical coordinate. Quart J R Meteorol Soc 109:81–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Shine KP (1987) The middle atmosphere in the absence of dynamical heat fluxes. Quart J R Meteorol Soc 113:603–663

    Google Scholar 

  • Shine KP, Rickaby JA (1990) Solar radiative heating due to absorption by ozone. In: Bojkov RD, Fabian P (eds) Ozone in the atmosphere. A Deepack Publishing, Hampton, Va, pp 597–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Storch H von (ed) (1988) Climate simulations with the ECMWF T21 model in Hamburg. Part II: Climatology and sensitivity experiments. Large scale atmospheric modelling report No 4. Meteorol Inst Universität Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Strobel DF (1978) Parametrisation of the atmospheric heating rate from 15–120 km due to O2 and 03 absorption of solar radiation. J Geophys Res 83:6225–6230

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibaldi S, Palmer T, Brankovic C, Cubasch U (1990) Extended Radnge Predictions with ECMWF Models. II Influence of horizontal resolution on systematic error and forecast skill. Quart JR Meteorol Soc 116:835–866

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiedtke M, Heckley WA, Slingo J (1988) Tropical forecasting at ECMWF: the influence of physical parameterisation on the mean structure of forecasts and analyses. Quart J R Met Soc 114:639–664

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pawson, S., Langematz, U., Meyer, A. et al. A comparison of the climatology of a tropospherestratosphere-mesosphere model with observations. Climate Dynamics 5, 161–174 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251807

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251807

Keywords

Navigation